Error No Policy Found Raccoon
Contents |
instructions: Windows Mac Red Hat Linux Ubuntu Click URL instructions: Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → error can t start the quick mode there is no isakmp sa (This may not be possible with some types of ads)
Failed To Get Proposal For Responder
More information about our ad policies X You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't
Ignore Information Because Isakmp-sa Has Not Been Established Yet
fill out this field. You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't fill out this field. Briefly describe the problem (required): Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Error: Failed To Pre-process Ph2 Packet
Select a file, or drag & drop file here. ✔ ✘ Please provide the ad click URL, if possible: Home Browse IPsec Tools Mailing Lists IPsec Tools Brought to you by: mit_warlord Summary Files Reviews Support Wiki Mailing Lists Tickets ▾ Bugs Support Requests Patches Feature Requests Code ipsec-tools-announce ipsec-tools-commits ipsec-tools-devel ipsec-tools-users Re: spdadd [Ipsec-tools-devel] racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id: Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id: From: Ryan Melendez
Active topics Forum Register Login Remember me Announcements RouterOS RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA RouterOS v7 Beginner Basics General Forwarding failed to get proposal for responder mikrotik Protocols Wireless Networking Scripting Virtualization Other topics The Dude RouterBOARD hardware failed to get sainfo The User Manager SwOS Training Home Forum index RouterOS General L R IPSec Phase 2 problems with racoon Post Reply Print view richardhkirkando just joined Topic Author Posts: 14 Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:11 pm Reputation: 0 IPSec Phase 2 problems with https://sourceforge.net/p/ipsec-tools/mailman/message/11662186/ racoon 0 Quote #1 Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:47 pm Hello,Setting up a point-to-point IPSec VPN between RouterOS and a FreeBSD server running racoon. As far as I can tell, I have everything configured correctly, but when I attempt to send traffic over the tunnel and bring up the VPN, I get these messages http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=26187 in the log:13:33:49 ipsec,ike respond new phase 1 negotiation: 66.170.8.18[500]<=>69.129.194.51[500] 13:33:49 ipsec,ike begin Identity Protection mode. 13:33:49 ipsec,ike received Vendor ID: DPD 13:33:50 ipsec,ike ISAKMP-SA established 66.170.8.18[500]-69.129.194.51[500] spi:4a1db066a87d8bf1:7d3b7c7b60599f0c 13:33:51 ipsec,ike respond new phase 2 negotiation: 66.170.8.18[500]<=>69.129.194.51[500] 13:33:51 ipsec,ike spid 5c1 is not found 13:33:51 ipsec,ike failed to get sainfo. 13:33:51 ipsec,ike failed to get proposal for responder. 13:33:51 ipsec,ike failed to pre-process packet. I'm curious to see if anybody has any insight on the last four lines here. It would appear that I have something wrong in my phase 2 configs, but like I said before, everything seems to match up. If it helps, here are the relevant portions of my configs:RouterOS:Code: Select all/ip ipsec proposal
set default auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=yes enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=30m name=default pfs-group=modp1024
add auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=no enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=1d name=proposal1 pfs-group=modp1024
/ip ipsec peer
add address=x.x.x.x/32:500 auth-method=pre-shared-key dh-group=modp1024 disabled=no dpd-interval=20s dpd-maximum-failures=\
1 enc-algorithm=3des exchange-mode=main generate-policy=no hash-algorithm=sha1 lifebytes=0 lifetime=1d nat-traversal=no \
proposal-check=obey secret=passphrasegoeshere send-initial-contact=yes
/ip ipsec policy
add action=encry
Search Tutorials/Articles Search HCL Search Reviews Search ISOs Go to Page... LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security IPSec w/ RHEL4- Racoon throwing error messages User Name Remember http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-security-4/ipsec-w-rhel4-racoon-throwing-error-messages-541666/ Me? Password Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions. https://www.v13.gr/blog/?p=261 Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many failed to other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today! Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in. Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links: Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you failed to get need to reset your password, click here. Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies. Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter. For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own. Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. Search this Thread 03-29-2007, 12:07 PM #1 s0n|k Member Registered: Feb 2006 Distribution: RHEL4 Posts: 80 Rep: IPSec w/ RHEL4- Racoon throwing error messages I'm using RHEL4 and the latest version of IPSEC tools from SourceForge. I've created my scripts and executed the setkey.conf (or ipsec.conf). When I execute the
pm TweetIt took me more than 6 months in order to sort all issues, so here are the experiences. Most of the trouble was because I didn't knew or I didn't had things clear in my mind. I wanted to have IPsec communication between a bunch of servers and a home network. I believe that this includes almost all (if not all) the possible scenarios of IPsec so it's more complicated than it sounds. For obvious reasons I'm presenting a simplified version here omitting all duplicates (i.e. multiple hosts with the same characteristics). The network We have the following nodes: A network behind a DSL line (home network) (normal, home DSL line with non-static IP, with NAT) A server (srv1) somewhere on the Internet with a static public IP address without NAT. A server (srv2) in Amazon's EC2 which has an allocated public IP address but uses local IP addresses and thus has NAT. Also Amazon doesn't allow ESP and AH protocol to be carried by IP packets inside their network. We also have the following systems: Home network: A bunch of Linux boxes on a private network plus a mikrotik router srv1 and srv2: Squeeze Debian Linux The home network uses IP addresses from the network 10.1.0.0/16. A secondary prefix (10.5.0.0/16) is allocated for IPsec addressing only. All home nodes have addresses from the 10.1.0.0/16. Some nodes (including the servers) have addresses from 10.5.0.0/16. Apart from the above there's a custom CA setup which publishes certificates for all nodes. The problem Setup IPsec so that: srv1 and srv2 can communicate with their public IP addresses with IPsec only boxes on the home network can communicate both with srv1 and srv2 using IPsec The setup Since there are more than one boxes on the home network, the home network needs to be connected with tunneled IPsec to srv1 and srv2. srv1 and srv2 need to be connected with transport mode between them in order to encrypt communication that uses their public IP addresses. We have setup the DSL router to forward everything to the mikrotik box (routerboard). This is usually referred as DMZ. By doing that it's possible to avoid NAT in IPsec (i.e. UDP encapsulation). The solution Mikrotik In short, Mikrotik's IPsec works quite well and is easy to setup assuming that everything is correct. It is however harder to debug than Racoon. Here's the setup: Add an IP address from 10.5.0.0/16 Import the box's certificate to the certificate storage, both certificate and public key are needed Import CA's and other boxes' certificates to the certificate storage. Make sure you use sensible names to be able to look them up later. Create a new proposal as