Error No Policy Found
Contents |
instructions: Windows Mac Red Hat Linux Ubuntu Click URL instructions: Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → (This may not be possible with some types of ads) More information error can t start the quick mode there is no isakmp sa about our ad policies X You seem to have CSS turned off.
Ignore Information Because Isakmp-sa Has Not Been Established Yet
Please don't fill out this field. You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't fill out this field. Briefly error: failed to pre-process ph2 packet describe the problem (required): Upload screenshot of ad (required): Select a file, or drag & drop file here. ✔ ✘ Please provide the ad click URL, if possible: Home Browse IPsec Tools spdadd Mailing Lists IPsec Tools Brought to you by: mit_warlord Summary Files Reviews Support Wiki Mailing Lists Tickets ▾ Bugs Support Requests Patches Feature Requests Code ipsec-tools-announce ipsec-tools-commits ipsec-tools-devel ipsec-tools-users Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id: Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id: From: Ryan Melendez
Failed To Get Proposal For Responder Mikrotik
Behalf Of Ryan Melendez > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:11 PM > To: ipsec-tools-devel@... > Subject: Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id: >=20 > sure enough getspbyspid is returning NULL. I'm pretty sure that > shouldn't happen for an spid that setkey lists. Any ideas? >=20 > racoon: ERROR: no policy found: id:2254857 >=20 > (gdb) call getspbyspid(2254857) > $3 =3D (struct secpolicy *) 0x0 >=20 > setkey -DP|grep -B5 -A1 2254857 > x.x.x.x[any] x.x.x.x[any] gre > out ipsec > esp/transport//require > created: Mar 16 02:46:59 2007 lastused: Mar 16 15:05:13 2007 > lifetime: 0(s) validtime: 0(s) > spid=3D2254857 seq=3D1491 pid=3D6845 > refcnt=3D1 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:11 -0500, Ryan Melendez wrote: > > After upgrading to a newer version of ipsec-tools I've had a problem > > with racoon not being able to complete the key exchange for several SP. > > It looks like this comes down to getspbyspid(spid) not finding the the > > SP after iterating through them all. I can dump the SPD and find the SP > > for the specified spid. This happens with several spid and goes awa
Monday « previous next » Print Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Author Topic: Ipsec errors please help need this up Monday (Read 26138 times) 0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. chrisreston Newbie Posts: 13 Karma: +0/-0 Ipsec errors please help need this up Monday « on: March 30, 2008, 01:32:01 am » This is the error I am getting on one box, I am using both Pfsense boxes. Any Ideas? Last 50 IPSEC log entries Mar 29 23:18:43 racoon: [Name]: ERROR: 66.93.!.! give up to get IPsec-SA due to time up to wait. Mar 29 23:18:13 racoon: [Name]: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: https://sourceforge.net/p/ipsec-tools/mailman/message/11662186/ 98.165.!.![0]<=>66.93.!.![0] Mar 29 23:12:55 racoon: [Name]: ERROR: 66.93.160.190 give up to get IPsec-SA due to time up to wait. Mar 29 23:12:25 racoon: [Name]: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 98.165.!.![500]<=>66.93.!.![500] Mar 29 23:12:24 racoon: [Name]: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established 98.165.!.![500]-66.93.!.!500] spi:197dccc5e520270d:6a80ee33c50666ef Mar 29 23:12:24 racoon: WARNING: No ID match. Mar 29 23:12:24 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD Mar 29 23:12:24 racoon: INFO: begin Aggressive mode. Mar 29 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=8634.0 23:12:24 racoon: [Name]: INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation: 98.165.!.![500]<=>66.93.!.![500] Mar 29 23:12:24 racoon: [Name]: INFO: IPsec-SA request for 66.93.!.! queued due to no phase1 found. Mar 29 23:11:44 racoon: ERROR: such policy already exists. anyway replace it: 172.16.0.0/16[0] 192.168.0.0/24[0] proto=any dir=out Mar 29 23:11:44 racoon: ERROR: such policy already exists. anyway replace it: 172.16.10.1/32[0] 172.16.0.0/16[0] proto=any dir=out Second Box ErrorsMar 29 23:27:16 racoon: ERROR: failed to pre-process packet. Mar 29 23:27:16 racoon: ERROR: failed to get proposal for responder. Mar 29 23:27:16 racoon: ERROR: no policy found: 172.16.0.0/16[0] 192.168.0.0/24[0] proto=any dir=in Mar 29 23:27:16 racoon: INFO: respond new phase 2 negotiation: 66.93.!.![0]<=>98.165.!.![0] Mar 29 23:27:06 racoon: ERROR: failed to pre-process packet. Mar 29 23:27:06 racoon: ERROR: failed to get proposal for responder. Mar 29 23:27:06 racoon: ERROR: no policy found: 172.16.0.0/16[0] 192.168.0.0/24[0] proto=any dir=in Mar 29 23:27:06 racoon: INFO: respond new phase 2 negotiation: 66.93.!.![0]<=>98.165.!.![0] Mar 29 23:26:56 racoon: ERROR: failed to pre-process packet. Mar 29 23:26:56 racoon: ERROR: failed to get proposal for responder. Mar 29 23:26:56 racoon: ERROR: no policy found: 172.16.0.0/16[0] 192.168.0.0/24[0] proto=any dir=in Logged cmb Hero Member Posts: 11239 Karma: +872/-7 Re: Ipsec errors please help need this up Monday « Reply #1 on: March 30,
pm TweetIt took me more than 6 months in order to sort all issues, so here are the experiences. Most of the trouble was because I didn't knew or I didn't had things clear in my mind. I wanted to have IPsec communication between https://www.v13.gr/blog/?p=261 a bunch of servers and a home network. I believe that this includes almost all (if http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=75748 not all) the possible scenarios of IPsec so it's more complicated than it sounds. For obvious reasons I'm presenting a simplified version here omitting all duplicates (i.e. multiple hosts with the same characteristics). The network We have the following nodes: A network behind a DSL line (home network) (normal, home DSL line with non-static IP, with NAT) A server (srv1) somewhere on the Internet with a failed to static public IP address without NAT. A server (srv2) in Amazon's EC2 which has an allocated public IP address but uses local IP addresses and thus has NAT. Also Amazon doesn't allow ESP and AH protocol to be carried by IP packets inside their network. We also have the following systems: Home network: A bunch of Linux boxes on a private network plus a mikrotik router srv1 and srv2: Squeeze Debian Linux The home network uses IP addresses from the network 10.1.0.0/16. error no policy A secondary prefix (10.5.0.0/16) is allocated for IPsec addressing only. All home nodes have addresses from the 10.1.0.0/16. Some nodes (including the servers) have addresses from 10.5.0.0/16. Apart from the above there's a custom CA setup which publishes certificates for all nodes. The problem Setup IPsec so that: srv1 and srv2 can communicate with their public IP addresses with IPsec only boxes on the home network can communicate both with srv1 and srv2 using IPsec The setup Since there are more than one boxes on the home network, the home network needs to be connected with tunneled IPsec to srv1 and srv2. srv1 and srv2 need to be connected with transport mode between them in order to encrypt communication that uses their public IP addresses. We have setup the DSL router to forward everything to the mikrotik box (routerboard). This is usually referred as DMZ. By doing that it's possible to avoid NAT in IPsec (i.e. UDP encapsulation). The solution Mikrotik In short, Mikrotik's IPsec works quite well and is easy to setup assuming that everything is correct. It is however harder to debug than Racoon. Here's the setup: Add an IP address from 10.5.0.0/16 Import the box's certificate to the certificate storage, both certificate and public key are needed Import CA's and other boxes' certificates to the certificate storage. Make sure you use sensible names to be able to look them up later. Create a new proposal as follows: Name: short (or pick s
Active topics Forum Register Login Remember me Announcements RouterOS RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA RouterOS v7 Beginner Basics General Forwarding Protocols Wireless Networking Scripting Virtualization Other topics The Dude RouterBOARD hardware The User Manager SwOS Training Home Forum index RouterOS RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA L R IPSec Policy not found when Generate enabled Post Reply Print view spike232 just joined Topic Author Posts: 19 Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:09 pm Reputation: 0 IPSec Policy not found when Generate enabled 0 Quote #1 Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:41 pm I have an RB2011 the new hardware revision so im stuck using 6.x.We set it up identically to an existing RB2011 but its the older hardware revision running 5.24.The routers main purpose is to terminate IPSec LAN to LAN VPN'sThe only config issue I had moving to 6.2 was the generate-policy under the peer has to be changed to generate-policy=port-override instead of generate-policy=yes.None of the remote routers will connect the IPSec tunnel, I turned on IPSec logging and found the error: No Policy Found, it then shows the policy requested by the router.The peer config is set to generate the policy so I dont know why its looking for one in the first place, if I manually create the policy based on what the router asked for then the VPN connects fine.I have even tried setting generate-policy=port-strict with no change.Is the policy generation broke in 6.x? or is there some other steps that must now be taken to make this work? Top andriys Long time Member Posts: 559 Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 2:59 pm Reputation: 20 Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine Re: IPSec Policy not found when Generate enabled 0 Quote #2 Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:53 pm One thing that was introduced in 6.x is policy templates. I don't remember documentation mentioning policy templates as being mandatory in case you have generate-policy enable