Error While Binding Ips
Contents |
Created:26 Mar 2014 | Modified:15 Apr 2016 Languages log in to start download LOGIN Don't have an account? Create one here. Or Continue As Guest Which best describes you: IT Admin Business User DOWNLOAD Symptoms or Error If you have configured a Virtual Local Area consul bind Network (VLAN) on an interface and try to bind multiple IP addresses to the consul failed to get advertise address: multiple private ips found. please configure one. same VLAN, an error message is displayed when binding the IP addresses that are members of the same subnet. The following consul multiple private ips found is a sample command sequence that attempts to bind multiple IP addresses to the same VLAN: add vlan 30 bind vlan 30 -ifnum 1/1 bind vlan 30 -IPAddress 10.1.10.200 255.255.255.0 bind vlan 30 -IPaddress consul multiple private ips found please configure one 10.1.10.21 255.255.255.0 ERROR: Operation not permitted bind vlan 30 -IPaddress 10.1.10.22 255.255.255.0 ERROR: Operation not permitted In the preceding set of commands, notice that an error message is displayed when you attempt to bind the last two IP addresses to the interface. Solution Run the preceding commands to bind IP addresses that belong to a different subnet not the same subnet. As follows, bind 10.1.20.21 255.255.255.0 to vlan
Consul Error Starting Agent Failed To Get Advertise Address Multiple Private Ips Found
30, as it belongs to a different subnet. NS> bind vlan 30 -IPaddress 10.1.20.21 255.255.255.0 Done NS> Show vlan command confirms the preceding configuration: NS> sh vlan VLAN ID: 30 VLAN Alias Name: Interfaces : 1/1 The following IPs are used: 10.1.10.200 Mask: 255.255.255.0 10.1.20.21 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Problem Cause When you bind an IP address to a dedicated VLAN on an interface, all the IP addresses defined in the subnet to which the bound IP address belongs are automatically bound to the interface. Therefore, when you attempt to bind another IP address of the same subnet, an error message is displayed. 10.1.10.21,10.1.10.22 and 10.1.10.200 have a subnet mask 255.255.255.0 that are members of same subnet. So, after we bind 10.1.10.200 to the vlan 30 and interface 1/1, all other IP for example, 10.1.10.21 and 10.1.10.22 are automatically bound to the same interface. Therefore, attempt to bind these displays the error. Applicable Products NetScaler Citrix Support Automatic translation This article was translated by an automatic translation system and was not reviewed by people. Citrix provides automatic translation to increase access to support content; however, automatically-translated articles may can contain errors. Citrix is not responsible for inconsistencies, errors, or damage incurred as a result of t
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 518 Star 7,495 Fork 1,244 hashicorp/consul Code Issues 488 Pull requests 52 Projects 0 Pulse Graphs New issue Agent will not start on machines without a private
Failed To Sync Remote State: No Cluster Leader
ip since it won't bind to any ip available. #725 Open cetex opened this Issue consul failed to get advertise address no private ip address found Feb 21, 2015 · 49 comments Projects None yet Labels None yet Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned consul failed to parse advertise address 19 participants cetex commented Feb 21, 2015 Consul agent won't start on our machines (that by default only have a public ip assigned, they are firewalled) since it won't bind to non-private ip's by default. A commandline http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX117345 option to override the behaviour of "only bind to private ip's by default" would help a lot. This option should change the current filters in consul for everything ip-related to allow any assigned ip to be used automatically. 🎉 1 cetex changed the title from Agent will not start since it won't bind to any ip available. to Agent will not start on machines without a private ip since it won't bind https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/issues/725 to any ip available. Feb 21, 2015 cetex referenced this issue Feb 21, 2015 Closed Agent does not start without -bind on EC2 VPC instance #703 cetex commented Feb 21, 2015 After investigating some more i realize it's not about bind-addresses, but advertise-addresses which almost makes this a bit silly. Consul runs and listens on any ip-address by default, but it refuses to announce any address that isn't rfc1918 by default? :) I believe a proper solution is to add a "allow announce networks" option. By default it can continue to have the current behavior where it will only advertise rfc1918 addresses. If this option is set it should override the default privateBlocks variable in util.go with the configured range, so the default rfc1918 addresses should not be set if this option is configured. The option should be able to be specified multiple times, we may for example have multiple address-ranges we want to allow. It should also be IPv6 capable. It would also be very nice if the -bind and the -client options could be specified multiple times, currently it only seems to bind to the last option specified on the commandline. Some thoughts i have about service design: A service shouldn't treat ip addresses differently if they are from one range or another as that's up to
Retired Junior Mod Resource Staff IRC Staff Downloads Spigot / BuildTools BungeeCord Jenkins Hub Issues Chat Members Notable Members Current Visitors Recent https://www.spigotmc.org/threads/dedicated-server-problem-i-think.101603/ Activity New Profile Posts Donate Your name or email address: Password: Forgot your password? Stay logged in Want a better Minecraft server? Read about SpigotMC here! Menu http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27514938/zeromq-pub-socket-binding-problems Home Home Quick Links Recent Posts Recent Activity Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums Recent Posts Search titles only Posted by Member: Separate names with a comma. failed to Newer Than: Search this thread only Search this forum only Display results as threads More... Useful Searches Recent Posts Resources Resources Quick Links Search Resources Most Active Authors Latest Reviews Wiki Wiki Quick Links Wiki Index Page List Recent Activity Team Team Quick Links Administrator Moderator Sponsor Developer Wiki Team Services Staff Retired Junior Mod multiple private ips Resource Staff IRC Staff Downloads Downloads Quick Links Spigot / BuildTools BungeeCord Jenkins Hub Issues Chat Members Members Quick Links Notable Members Current Visitors Recent Activity New Profile Posts Donate Menu Log in Sign up SpigotMC - High Performance Minecraft Home Forums Server Administration Performance Tweaking Dedicated server problem i think ... Discussion in 'Performance Tweaking' started by loadeddiper, Nov 6, 2015. loadeddiper So i have a server from ovh and i Bought extra dedicated ips so i can run more mc servers with domains and so anyways it was all working good and then when i restarted the dedicated still worked but then all the servers exept from the main ip of the dedi that one server run on all the rest are getting this error 06.11 09:54:03 [Multicraft] Server stopped 06.11 09:54:03 [Multicraft] Server shut down 06.11 09:54:03 [Server] INFO Saving players 06.11 09:54:03 [Server] INFO Stopping server 06.11 09:54:03 [Server] WARN Perhaps a server is already running on
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up ZeroMQ: PUB socket binding problems up vote 0 down vote favorite I have a simple PUB/SUB messaging program. I'm trying to bind it to tcp://*:5556 range to publish at all available ips with the port. When a socket is binding the error is returning: Resource temporarily unavailable. I'm trying to start the publisher thread first. The port is free. What is wrong with the binding process? Publisher: int main (void) { void *context = zmq_ctx_new(); void *publisher = zmq_socket(context, ZMQ_PUB); zmq_bind(publisher, "tcp://*:5556"); printf("Binding: %s\n", zmq_strerror(errno)); srandom((unsigned) time(NULL)); while(true) { char update[20]; sprintf(update, "%05d %d %d", randof(10000), randof(215) - 80, randof(50) + 10); sleep(1); zmq_send(publisher, update, strlen(update), 0); printf("Sending: %s", zmq_strerror(errno)); } zmq_close(publisher); zmq_ctx_destroy(context); return 0; } Subscriber: int main () { void *context = zmq_ctx_new(); void *subscriber = zmq_socket(context, ZMQ_SUB); zmq_connect(subscriber, "tcp://localhost:5556"); printf("Connection: %s\n", zmq_strerror(errno)); while(true) { char update[20]; zmq_recv(subscriber, update, 20, 0); printf("Receiving: %s\n", zmq_strerror(errno)); printf("Message: %s\n", update); } zmq_close(subscriber); zmq_ctx_destroy(context); return 0; } sockets tcp messaging zeromq share|improve this question asked Dec 16 '14 at 22:13 I159 4,097145080 ad