Failed To Create Rtsp Server Bind Error
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Super User Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How to explicitly free EADDRINUSE port for binding it again? up vote 0 down vote favorite $ testOnDemandRTSPServer ... Play this stream using the URL "rtsp://192.168.90.2:8554 ... ^C $ testOnDemandRTSPServer Failed to create RTSP server: bind() error (port number: 8554): Address already in use How to manually explicitly free up the port after a non-REUSEADDR program? I don't want to wait or change port every time... linux networking sockets share|improve this question asked Apr 24 '13 at 11:53 Vi. 6,0771359135 Link: serverfault.com/questions/329845/… –Vi. Apr 26 '13 at 11:01 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 0 down vote Unfortunately, on Linux there's nothing you can do (other than fixing the code to set SO_REUSEADDR). From man 7 socket: Linux will only allow port reuse with the SO_REUSEADDR option when this option was set both in the previous program that performed a bind(2) to the port and in the program that wants to reuse the port. This differs from some implementations (e.g., FreeBSD) where only the later program needs to set the SO_REUSEADDR option. Typically this difference is invisible, since, for example, a server program is designed to always set this option. share|improve this answer answered Apr 26 '13 at 8:16 Gabe 1,542414 Is it just me who annoyed by Address already in use message during development? Maybe
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 33 Star 131 Fork 59 mpromonet/v4l2rtspserver Code Issues 1 Pull requests 0 Projects 0 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue Port reuse #18 Closed ronnyvdbr opened this Issue Mar 1, 2016 · 9 comments Projects None yet Labels None yet Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned 2 participants ronnyvdbr commented Mar 1, 2016 Hi, i'm still using your program and am implementing it currently in my web cam project. http://ronnyvdbr.github.io/RaspberryIPCamera/ When I launch your executable and close it, then I'm not able to http://superuser.com/questions/587055/how-to-explicitly-free-eaddrinuse-port-for-binding-it-again immediately re-launch it. I get the following message: Failed to create RTSP server: bind() error (port number: 8554): Address already in use I should be able to overcome this if I compile your work with the following option: ALLOW_RTSP_SERVER_PORT_REUSE=1 I have used this option before when compiling live555 rtsp server as per below procedure (note the option ALLOW_RTSP_SERVER_PORT_REUSE=1) cd /home/pi/ wget http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/public/live555-latest.tar.gz tar -zxvf live555-latest.tar.gz mv https://github.com/mpromonet/v4l2rtspserver/issues/18 live live555 cd live555 sed -i 's/-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64/-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DALLOW_RTSP_SERVER_PORT_REUSE=1/g' ./config.linux ./genMakefiles linux make Would u have any idea where I need to insert this option to also use it to compile your work? ronnyvdbr commented Mar 1, 2016 Never mind, found it: cmake . && make CFLAGS='-DALLOW_RTSP_SERVER_PORT_REUSE=1' ronnyvdbr closed this Mar 1, 2016 ronnyvdbr reopened this Mar 2, 2016 ronnyvdbr commented Mar 2, 2016 Hmm, apparently the compile options didn't resolve the issue. Below is a link to a mailing list with a solution description. http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2011-October/013966.html Do u think this piece of code is present in your work? Owner mpromonet commented Mar 3, 2016 Hi Ronny, The option should be set compiling live555, not compiling h264_v4l2_rtspserver. However perhaps it is possible to close properly the RTSPServer instance, I will make some tries but I am afraid that the socket is closed without reading the pending data. Best Regards, Michel. ronnyvdbr commented Mar 4, 2016 Hi, thanks for your reply. I tried to narrow down the usage of the SO_REUSEADDR and SO_REUSEPORT socket options in h264_v4l2_rtspserver but wasn't able to find these socket options in your source code. I was however able to find traces of this in
found for "GET /viewtopic.php" VideoLAN Forum Home All times are UTC+02:00 Delete all board cookies The team Powered by phpBB Forum Software © phpBB Limited GZIP: On
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up RTSP proxy for SDP files up vote 1 down vote favorite 1 I have a video client that can only join a video stream via an rtsp request - it is unable to consume an SDP file directly. However, the multicast video sources it needs to view do not support rtsp.... Ultimately all an rtsp request is doing is providing a machanism for the SDP to be returned to the client...so I've been trying to find a solution that would allow me to make an rtsp request from the client to a proxy server of some kind, and dependant upon the URI used that server would then return the relevant SDP in response to a DESCRIBE request. This would allow me to play the video sources, despite the fact that the client can only request video via rtsp.... This sounds simple, but I haven't managed to find a way of doing it. Any ideas? rtsp live555 share|improve this question asked Sep 11 '15 at 11:43 user1447903 2826 Why don't you just implement the dummy RTSP server with hard-coded responses if that's all you need i.e. on OPTIONS return a hard-coded options string, etc. You can see what responses are required by streaming a multicast session using the live555 RTSP server. –Ralf Sep 11 '15 at 13:52 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 0 down vote This is w