Last Error At Ext4_mb_generate_buddy
Contents |
This bug affects 15 people Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone Linux Edit Unknown Unknown linux-kernel-bugs #104571 You need to log in to change this bug's status. Launchpad ext4_mb_generate_buddy:757 couldn't connect to Linux Kernel Bug Tracker. (what does this mean?) Affecting:
Ext4_mb_generate_buddy Block Bitmap And Bg Descriptor Inconsistent
Linux Filed here by: Jan Wagner When: 2015-11-12 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex ext4 fs error block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Ubuntu Linaro Evaluation Build Ubuntu RTM Package (Find…) Project (Find…) Status Importance Unknown Unknown Assigned to unknown Remote Watch None, the ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739 status of the bug is updated manually. None, the status of the bug is updated manually. Debian Bug tracker #772848 Debian Bug tracker #818502 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #102731 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #104571 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #89621 URL: The information about this bug in Launchpad is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. This information was last pulled 20
Ext4_mb_generate_buddy:755:
hours ago. Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report linux (Debian) Edit Fix Released Unknown debbugs #772848 You need to log in to change this bug's status. Affecting: linux (Debian) Filed here by: Emmanuel Lacour When: 2015-09-24 Started work: 2016-07-08 Completed: 2016-07-08 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Debian Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Ubuntu Linaro Evaluation Build Ubuntu RTM Package (Find…) Project (Find…) Status Importance Fix Released Unknown Assigned to unknown Remote Watch None, the status of the bug is updated manually. None, the status of the bug is updated manually. Debian Bug tracker #772848 Debian Bug tracker #818502 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #102731 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #104571 Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #89621 URL: The information about this bug in Launchpad is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. This information was last pulled on 2016-10-19. Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report linux (Ubuntu) Edit Confirmed High Unassigned Edit You need to log in to change
Red Hat Certificate System Red Hat Satellite Subscription Asset Manager Red Hat Update Infrastructure Red Hat Insights Ansible Tower by Red Hat Cloud Computing Back Red Hat CloudForms Red Hat OpenStack Platform Red Hat ext4_lookup: deleted inode referenced: Cloud Infrastructure Red Hat Cloud Suite Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Red Hat ext4 fs error device sda1 OpenShift Online Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated Storage Back Red Hat Gluster Storage Red Hat Ceph Storage JBoss Development and Management Back
Ext4-fs Error Raspberry Pi
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Red Hat JBoss Data Grid Red Hat JBoss Web Server Red Hat JBoss Portal Red Hat JBoss Operations Network Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio JBoss Integration and Automation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423672 Back Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization Red Hat JBoss Fuse Red Hat JBoss A-MQ Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite Red Hat JBoss BRMS Mobile Back Red Hat Mobile Application Platform Services Back Consulting Technical Account Management Training & Certifications Red Hat Enterprise Linux Developer Program Support Get Support Production Support Development Support Product Life Cycle & Update Policies Knowledge Search Documentation Knowledgebase Videos Discussions Ecosystem Browse Certified Solutions Overview https://access.redhat.com/solutions/155873 Partner Resources Tools Back Red Hat Insights Learn More Red Hat Access Labs Explore Labs Configuration Deployment Troubleshooting Security Additional Tools Red Hat Access plug-ins Red Hat Satellite Certificate Tool Security Back Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Resources Overview Security Blog Security Measurement Severity Ratings Backporting Policies Product Signing (GPG) Keys Community Back Discussions Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Hat Satellite Customer Portal Private Groups All Discussions Start a Discussion Blogs Customer Portal Red Hat Product Security Red Hat Access Labs Red Hat Insights All Blogs Events Customer Events Red Hat Summit Stories Red Hat Subscription Benefits You Asked. We Acted. Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log Out Language Back English español Deutsch italiano 한국어 français 日本語 português 中文 (中国) русский Customer Portal Search Products & Services Back View All Products Infrastructure and Management Back Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Hat Identity Management Red Hat Directory Server Red Hat Certificate System Red Hat Satellite Subscription Asset Manager Red Hat Update Infrastructure Red Hat Insights An
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation Social Media Facebook https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2286077 Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1127434 Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Specialised Support Ubuntu Servers, Cloud and Juju Server Platforms [SOLVED] Screwed again? Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Page 1 of 2 12 fs error Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 10 of 15 Thread: Screwed again? Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode July 9th, 2015 #1 MakOwner View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Quad Shot of Ubuntu Join Date Dec 2008 Location Taxes Beans 455 DistroUbuntu Studio 12.04 Precise Pangolin Screwed again? EXT4 file system on a RAID6 array in good health. I dismount, block bitmap and run fsck, clean the file system, remount and try to write another file and get the same error and journal abort. This is 16 2 TB volumes in RAID6 -- Am I just screwed by the volume size? [ 462.680976] EXT4-fs error (device md8): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 30561, 15353 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd [ 462.695835] Aborting journal on device md8-8. [ 462.751010] EXT4-fs (md8): Remounting filesystem read-only [ 462.791520] EXT4-fs error (device md8): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 30592, 30643 clusters in bitmap, 30688 in gd [ 482.558216] EXT4-fs error (device md8): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 60017, 5964 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd [ 482.575483] EXT4-fs (md8): ext4_da_writepages: jbd2_start: 26085 pages, ino 382667302; err -30 [ 482.582957] EXT4-fs (md8): ext4_da_writepages: jbd2_start: 9223372036854775807 pages, ino 382666770; err -30 Must be -- finally got the file system clean and ureadahead is crapping itself. This is at 3.2.0-87 - anyone else running into this? Last edited by MakOwner; July 10th, 2015 at 12:37 AM. Adv Reply July 10th, 2015 #2 tgalati4 View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message This space is currently for rent . . Join Date Feb 2007 Location West Hills CA Beans 10,050 DistroUbuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr Re: Screwed again? I would check your power supply. If you have one drive that can't keep its speed, you will get IO Waits. Run top in a terminal and l
Post #1 of 2 (6674 views) Permalink EXT4-fs error - ext4_mb_generate_buddy Running ext4 on Fedora 10, kernel 2.6.29.6-93.fc10.x86_64. Partition in question is an 8 disk software RAID10 with mostly SATA disks and one IDE disk. We've never seen any hardware or filesystem corruption issues on this machine in the past, though the RAID10 setup is new - was put into service the same time we migrated the partition from ext3 to ext4 (fresh filesystem created and data copied over). Earlier today, we saw this message in the logs: EXT4-fs error (device md0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group 586: 19635 blocks in bitmap, 19636 in gd It looks rather ominous and we will be scheduling a reboot to force a fsck as well as to upgrade to kernel-2.6.29.6-99.fc10.x86_64 (which doesn't appear to have any ext4 related changes in it). Looking in the archives, I'm not quite sure what to make of the message, but it does seem to indicate that we may have filesystem corruption. Any suggestions? Thanks -Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ tytso at mit Sep10,2009,12:19PM Post #2 of 2 (6430 views) Permalink Re: EXT4-fs error - ext4_mb_generate_buddy [In reply to] On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:56:42AM -0700, David Rees wrote: > Running ext4 on Fedora 10, kernel 2.6.29.6-93.fc10.x86_64. Partition > in question is an 8 disk software RAID10 with mostly SATA disks and > one IDE disk. We've never seen any hardware or filesystem corruption > issues on this machine in the past, though the RAID10 setup is new - > was put into service the same time we migrated the partition from ext3 > to ext4 (fresh filesystem created and data copied over). > > Earlier today, we saw this message in the logs: > > EXT4-fs error (device md0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group > 586: 19635 blocks in bitmap, 19636 in gd > > It looks rather ominous and we will be scheduling a reboot to force a > fsck as well as to upgrade to kernel-2.6.29.6-99.fc10.x86_64 (which > doesn't appear to have any ext4 related changes in it). Looking in > the archives, I'm not quite sure what to make of the message, but it > does seem to indicate that we may have filesystem corruption. Any > suggestions? We need to fix up this message so it