General Protection Ip Sp Error
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more linux general protection fault about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads general protection fault fix with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow general protection fault error code is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up general protection error on linux based OS up vote 0 down vote
General Protection Fault 0000 #1 Smp
favorite I am getting a General protection error while I run a binary. But there is no core dump. How do I debug the problem ? Is this the problem with the "ld" i am using ? kernel: testbin[24879] general protection ip:7fd7271585e0 sp:7fff1ef55070 error:0 in ld-2.14.so[7fd727142000+20000] linux interrupt share|improve this question asked Feb 28 '13 at 18:10 mnpria 715 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up general protection ip error 0 vote 1 down vote Before debugging, re-compile your program with debugging symbols (-g option), else you wont have enough detail information to effectively and quickly debug it (like filename, function, line). There are more programs for debugging programs but for now I will suggest you valgrind. So run your program through valgrind: valgrind /path/to/your/program and then reproduce steps to cause your program to General Protection Fault. If the software isnt yours, you'll have to contact the author and get support. share|improve this answer answered Feb 28 '13 at 18:27 Zaffy 8,93442662 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password Post as a guest Name Email Post as a guest Name Email discard By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service. Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged linux interrupt or ask your own question. asked 3 years ago viewed 5101 times active 3 years ago Related 13Linux kernel interrupt handler mutex protection?6How shared IRQ races are avoided in Linux0Enable GPIO wakeup in Embedded Linux2Determining the interrupt type in linux (edge-triggered vs. level-triggered)3How to add a pe
1 #1 2015-05-07 10:08:29 eaglexro traps general protection Member Registered: 2011-03-18 Posts: 11 Multiple programs
Traps General Protection Ip
crashing wSegmentation fault in __lll_unlock_elision Hi,Recently I've noticed different programs
Mimo Simo Miso
crashing with Segmentation fault in __lll_unlock_elision from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0It has happened in chromium, vlc, gtk-query-immodules-2.0 and others.Has anyone http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15142590/general-protection-error-on-linux-based-os else had this issue?I'm on xfce, compositor enabled, nvidia proprietary drivers.Relevant packages:nvidia 349.16-2xfwm4 4.12.2-1glibc 2.21-3Sample backtrace:(gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff6e30150 in __lll_unlock_elision () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007ffff28c312c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1 #2 0x00007ffff28558c2 in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=197100 ?? () from /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1 #3 0x00007fffffffea80 in ?? () #4 0x00007ffff28d4831 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1 #5 0x00007fffffffea80 in ?? () #6 0x00007ffff7dea815 in _dl_fini () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)dmesg[ 1037.049770] traps: exo-open[4639] general protection ip:7fcf8cde1150 sp:7ffdb47b3f68 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fcf8cdcf000+18000] [ 1037.338044] traps: chromium[4643] general protection ip:7f6e9248f150 sp:7ffc2b329c48 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f6e9247d000+18000] [ 1038.637627] traps: exo-helper-1[4641] general protection ip:7fc9bc586150 sp:7ffc590b11b8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fc9bc574000+18000] [ 1563.263410] traps: exo-open[5860] general protection ip:7fbcafcb1150 sp:7fffaf2b1b88 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fbcafc9f000+18000] [ 1563.541248] traps: chromium[5865] general protection ip:7f6571529150 sp:7fff0e0d9898 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f6571517000+18000] [ 1565.023467] traps: exo-helper-1[5863] general protection ip:7f7008a5b150 sp:7ffe8751b268 error:0
faults General support questions Post Reply Print view Search Advanced search 4 posts • Page 1 of 1 sfatula Posts: http://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1770 2 Joined: 2009/03/28 11:31:54 Contact: Contact sfatula Website 6.2, general protection faults Quote Postby sfatula » 2012/01/25 19:46:19 I am seeing these on a 64 bit server with https://github.com/Level/levelup/issues/172 < 1% utilization, it's a fairly new machine with no users at this time other than me, the admin. I've never seen these sorts of errors, and, general protection can't seem to find any guidance on what they might be caused by. Here are some log examples:Jan 22 16:08:39 host36 kernel: dspam[3239] general protection ip:7f64f4c409e7 sp:7f64f298c2b0 error:0 in libc-2.12.so[7f64f4bf9000+197000]Jan 22 16:12:16 host36 kernel: dspam[3896] general protection ip:7f47de8369e7 sp:7f47dc5822b0 error:0 in libc-2.12.so[7f47de7ef000+197000]Jan 25 03:25:02 host36 kernel: gate_news[29976] general protection ip:7f2e5edbdec9 sp:7fffed979d70 error:0 in libpython2.6.so.1.0[7f2e5ecb3000+170000]Jan 25 03:56:06 general protection fault host36 kernel: yum[31053] general protection ip:7f19b07a0ec9 sp:7fffcf9fb630 error:0 in libpython2.6.so.1.0[7f19b0696000+170000]Jan 25 03:56:16 host36 kernel: yum[31111] general protection ip:7f652ad3cec9 sp:7fff964e3060 error:0 in libpython2.6.so.1.0[7f652ac32000+170000]Jan 25 04:00:05 host36 kernel: clamd[31256] general protection ip:7ff970aafa05 sp:7fff1fcb3ab8 error:0 in libclamav.so.6.1.12[7ff970a11000+116000]What are likely causes for such errors? Machine has 16GB ram, of which < 50% is used. Perhaps a memory problem? Something else? This is on 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64, Intel i7Steve Top pschaff Retired Moderator Posts: 18276 Joined: 2006/12/13 20:15:34 Location: Tidewater, Virginia, North America Contact: Contact pschaff Website 6.2, general protection faults Quote Postby pschaff » 2012/01/25 20:18:23 My first suspicion would be bad memory. Try running memtest86+ at least overnight - longer is better. Top TrevorH Forum Moderator Posts: 16858 Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56 Location: Brighton, UK Re: 6.2, general protection faults Quote Postby TrevorH » 2012/01/25 20:46:18 I would upgrade to kernel 2.6.32-220-4.1 immediately. Not only does it fix a local root exploit but the release notes for it had something about a 1 byte overlay of memory at random places. Top Displ
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 100 Star 2,294 Fork 177 Level/levelup Code Issues 56 Pull requests 5 Projects 0 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue Weird segmentation fault #172 Closed binarykitchen opened this Issue Aug 15, 2013 · 14 comments Projects None yet Labels None yet Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned 3 participants binarykitchen commented Aug 15, 2013 Error messages behave weird and I am unable to use levelup due to lack of information. Let me explain. The following code produces a segmentation fault in my test script: // lots of code var dbLocation = './test/db/level/'; var mainDB = levelup(dbLocation); // more code shows: > make test Segmentation fault (core dumped) make: *** [test] Error 139 then I changed some lines: // lots of code var dbLocation = './test/db/level/'; if (fs.existsSync(dbLocation)) { console.log('exists!'); } else { console.log('does not exist!'); } var mainDB = levelup(dbLocation); // more code and then, wow, I see a memory corruption error and had to interrupt with CTRL-C: make test exists! *** Error in `node': malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x00000000017d81a0 *** ^Cmake: *** [test] Interrupt Weird. Why it is showing a different error message when I do a synchronous fs.existsSync check before? './test/db/level/ is just an empty directory where to put the db. Any clues what's the problem here? Node.js LevelDB member rvagg commented Aug 15, 2013 No clues but that existsSync call in between causing a different error is pretty typical of a lot of errors that you can cause in node because of the weirdness of async timing, often a console.log can do the same thing cause it slows things down a bit. Can you tell us what version of levelup & leveldown you have installed in your stack, what version of Node you're getting this with and on what operating system? binarykitchen commented Aug 15, 2013 I ran npm update before that so I must have all the latest versions incl. node v0.10.15. OS is Ubuntu