Generic Error-modelling System Gms
Contents |
Identification of issues in change and transition management Design of working environment and human-machine interfacesDesign of working environment and human-machine interfaces skill based error example Impact on human performanceAssessment of workload Identification of potential human gems framework and error types error and assessment of human error Assessment of trust Assessment of team work and communication generic error modeling system wikipedia Assessment of situational awareness Assessment of Acceptance Technical system supporting human performanceTask allocation between the human and machine Login Home What's New Forum Acronyms and
Generic Error Modelling System Psychology
Terminology Contact & Support You are hereHome » Impact on human performance » Identification of potential human error and assessment of human error » Generic Error Modelling System (GEMS) Generic Error Modelling System (GEMS) Submitted by superadmin on Mon, 10/22/2012 - 14:45 HP Activity Categories:Identification of potential human error and assessment what are the universal factors of accidents? of human errorResource Type:MethodAbstract:GEMS is an error classification method that is designed to provide insight as to why an operator may move between skill-based or automatic rule based behaviour and rule or knowledge-based diagnosis. Errors are categorised as slips/lapses (frequently skill-based errors) and mistakes (usually knowledge based errors). The result of GEMS is a taxonomy of error types that can be used to identify cognitive determinants in error sensitive environments. GEMS relies on the analyst either having insight to the tasks under scrutiny or the collaboration of a subject matter expert, and an appreciation of the psychological determinants of error. ReferencesDeveloper and source:1) Reason, J. Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990 2) Alm, I. Cognitive Tasks: A Meta Analysis of Methods. FOA Report No C 500985.5, Sundbyberg, Sweden, National Defence Research Establishment, Department of Human Studies (1992). 3) “Modelling erroneous operator behaviours for an air-traffic control task
Performance Measurement Physiological Tools Secondary Tasks Situation Awareness Stress Workload Human Computer Interaction Tools skill-based slip definition Prototyping Usability Human Factors Knowledge Tools Databases Guidelines HF Glossary
Microsystem Approach To Quality Improvement Includes
Standards Technical Reports Human Factors Program Planning Tools Cost / Risk/ Benefit Decision-Making Economic
What Are The Classifications Of Reason’s Gems For Error Types?
Project Management Data Item Descriptions Knowledge Elicitation Tools Cognitive Task Analysis Interviews Observation Tools Questionnaire Task Analysis Modeling & Simulation Cognitive Modeling Human Performance https://ext.eurocontrol.int/ehp/?q=node/1593 Modeling Mathematical Modeling Modeling Simulation System Performance Modeling Training Simulator Physical Ergonomics Empirical Models Postural Analysis Tool Software Standards Safety Accident Investigation Human Error Human Reliability Risk Assessment Critical Decision Method Human Factors Analysis And Classification System (HFACS) Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP) Influence Diagram Operator Action Trees http://www.hf.faa.gov/workbenchtools/default.aspx?rPage=Tooldetails&subCatId=41&toolID=82 (OATS) Procedural Event Analysis Tool (PEAT) Reason 5 SATORI ACT-R Cognition as a Network of Tasks (COGNET) Executive Process Interactive Control (EPIC) Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT) Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) Man Machine Integrated Design and Analysis System (MIDAS) Operator Model Architecture (OMAR) Card Sorting Armed Forces Qualification Test Boyett & Conn's White Collar Performance Measure Complex Cognitive Assessment Battery Cost Estimation for Conducting Simulations Cost-Benefit Analysis for Human Factors Integration: A Practical Guide Decision Analysis Human Factors Assessments In Investment Analysis: Human Factors Cost Estimation – Potential Approaches: A Concept Paper National Airspace Resource Investment Model (NARIM) Activity Catalog Tool All-Digital Integrated Video Analysis System (ADIVA) Cluster Analysis Confusion Matrix Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis Multimedia Video Task Analysis (MVTA) Spotfire Starlight STATGRAPHICS Plus DID-Critical Task Analysis Report DID-Human Engineering Design Approach Document – Maintainer DID-Human Engineering Design Approach Document
Grounding Reader Profiles Management Toolbox Regulatory Update Tailgate Safety Topics Education iPi Online Learning. About iPi Online Learning Course Catalog View a Course Sample OSHA Update Bundle Login to Your Purchased Courses iPi Plus http://incident-prevention.com/ip-articles/human-performance Subscriber Login iP Utility Safety Conference Frontline Utility Leadership Customized Training On-Site Training Certification Conference Register for Conference Products Advertise Jobs Contact Incident Prevention Magazine Navigation Home Categories Tags Bloggers Subscribe to blog Subscribe via RSS Font size: + – Subscribe to this blog post Print Bookmark Human Performance Thursday, 02 October 2008 Jeff Clark, CUSP September-October 2008 14580 Hits 0 Comments The Generic generic error Error Modeling System (GEMS) has developed a framework for understanding error types and designing error prevention strategies. During just about every conference at which I speak at least one person asks, “Okay, what is this human performance stuff?” I typically answer by making an analogy to behavior-based safety programs that are directed at observing and changing the behaviors of workers to produce a what are the safer work environment and to reduce injuries. I like to say that Human Performance is behavior-based safety on steroids, because it looks not only at the individual’s behaviors and actions, but also at the organization’s.The study and practice of Human Performance is relatively new. The study of errors from a psychological standpoint began long ago, but those studies were conducted from an academic standpoint designed to classify errors into cognitive and non-cognitive categories. They had little practical application.In the early 1970s, Dr. James Reason began looking at errors both from an academic and practical standpoint. He utilized the research conducted by his peers and predecessors to develop a framework to understand error types and, once understood, to design error prevention strategies. The framework that he developed is named the Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS).In a speech to a group from the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators, Jeff Lyash, President and CEO of Progress Energy Florida, bridged the gap from the application of human performance principles at nuclear power plants to the transmission and distribution organizations within those companies. He asked the group if line and substation work was hazar