Generic Error Modelling System
Contents |
Jump to: navigation, searchHERE Article Information Category: Human Performance Modelling Content source: SKYbrary Content control: SKYbrary Description The Generic Error-Modelling skill based error example System (GEMS) integrates, within the same framework, the different error gems framework and error types mechanisms (slips, lapses and mistakes) and the three levels of performance (Skill, Rule, Knowledge (SRK)). The generic error modeling system wikipedia integration of these two dimensions allows us to: Gain a deeper understanding the nature of mistakes: Indeed, we can distinguish between rule-based mistakes and knowledge-based mistakes
Generic Error Modelling System Psychology
Appreciate the details of the differences among error types Appreciate how errors can be considered the "other side of the coin" of those cognitive processes that allow us to act quickly or find creative solutions. Anticipate when, and in what conditions, a certain type of error may occur. GEMS and errors Errors can what are the universal factors of accidents? occur at each level of performance: skill-based (SB): slips and lapses usually errors of inattention or misplaced attention rule-based (RB): mistakes usually a result of picking an inappropriate rule caused by misconstrued view of state, over-zealous pattern matching, frequency gambling, deficient rules knowledge-based (KB): mistakes due to incomplete/inaccurate understanding of system, confirmation bias, overconfidence, cognitive strain, ... Errors can result from operating at wrong level: humans are reluctant to move from a RB to KB level even if rules aren’t working Related Articles Human Error Types Generic Error-Modelling System (GEMS) Heinrich Pyramid Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) ICAO SHELL Model James Reason HF Model LMQ HF Model PEAR Model Retrieved from "http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php?title=Generic_Error-Modelling_System_(GEMS)&oldid=116992" Categories: Human Performance ModellingOperational Issues Page Discussion View source History TEST Log in Navigation Home page Operational issues Human performance Enhancing safety Safety regulations Accidents and incidents Aircraft Types Airport Directory Toolkits Bookshelf Publications information About SKYbrary Contact us Help Glossary
Performance Measurement Physiological Tools Secondary Tasks Situation Awareness Stress Workload skill-based slip definition Human Computer Interaction Tools Prototyping Usability Human Factors Knowledge
Microsystem Approach To Quality Improvement Includes
Tools Databases Guidelines HF Glossary Standards Technical Reports Human Factors Program Planning Tools Cost
What Are The Classifications Of Reason’s Gems For Error Types?
/ Risk/ Benefit Decision-Making Economic Project Management Data Item Descriptions Knowledge Elicitation Tools Cognitive Task Analysis Interviews Observation Tools Questionnaire Task Analysis http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Generic_Error-Modelling_System_(GEMS) Modeling & Simulation Cognitive Modeling Human Performance Modeling Mathematical Modeling Modeling Simulation System Performance Modeling Training Simulator Physical Ergonomics Empirical Models Postural Analysis Tool Software Standards Safety Accident Investigation Human Error Human Reliability Risk Assessment Critical Decision Method Human Factors Analysis And Classification System http://www.hf.faa.gov/workbenchtools/default.aspx?rPage=Tooldetails&subCatId=41&toolID=82 (HFACS) Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP) Influence Diagram Operator Action Trees (OATS) Procedural Event Analysis Tool (PEAT) Reason 5 SATORI ACT-R Cognition as a Network of Tasks (COGNET) Executive Process Interactive Control (EPIC) Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT) Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) Man Machine Integrated Design and Analysis System (MIDAS) Operator Model Architecture (OMAR) Card Sorting Armed Forces Qualification Test Boyett & Conn's White Collar Performance Measure Complex Cognitive Assessment Battery Cost Estimation for Conducting Simulations Cost-Benefit Analysis for Human Factors Integration: A Practical Guide Decision Analysis Human Factors Assessments In Investment Analysis: Human Factors Cost Estimation – Potential Approaches: A Concept Paper National Airspace Resource Investment Model (NARIM) Activity Catalog Tool All-Digital Integrated Video Analysis System (ADIVA) Cluster Analysis Confusion Matrix Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis Multimedia Video Task Ana
Grounding Reader Profiles Management Toolbox Regulatory Update Tailgate Safety Topics Education iPi Online Learning. About iPi Online Learning Course Catalog View a Course Sample OSHA Update Bundle Login http://incident-prevention.com/ip-articles/human-performance to Your Purchased Courses iPi Plus Subscriber Login iP Utility Safety Conference Frontline Utility Leadership Customized Training On-Site Training Certification Conference Register for Conference Products Advertise Jobs Contact Incident Prevention Magazine Navigation Home Categories Tags Bloggers Subscribe to blog Subscribe via RSS Font size: + – Subscribe to this blog post Print Bookmark Human Performance Thursday, 02 generic error October 2008 Jeff Clark, CUSP September-October 2008 14579 Hits 0 Comments The Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS) has developed a framework for understanding error types and designing error prevention strategies. During just about every conference at which I speak at least one person asks, “Okay, what is this human performance stuff?” I typically answer by making an analogy generic error modelling to behavior-based safety programs that are directed at observing and changing the behaviors of workers to produce a safer work environment and to reduce injuries. I like to say that Human Performance is behavior-based safety on steroids, because it looks not only at the individual’s behaviors and actions, but also at the organization’s.The study and practice of Human Performance is relatively new. The study of errors from a psychological standpoint began long ago, but those studies were conducted from an academic standpoint designed to classify errors into cognitive and non-cognitive categories. They had little practical application.In the early 1970s, Dr. James Reason began looking at errors both from an academic and practical standpoint. He utilized the research conducted by his peers and predecessors to develop a framework to understand error types and, once understood, to design error prevention strategies. The framework that he developed is named the Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS).In a speech to a group from the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators, Jeff Lyash, President and CEO o
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:16:39 GMT by s_wx1131 (squid/3.5.20)