01438 Oracle Error
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and ora-01438 how to find column name policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company
How To Resolve Ora-01438
Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users sql error: 1438, sqlstate: 22003 Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a
Number Precision In Oracle
minute: Sign up ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column up vote 7 down vote favorite We get sometimes the following error from our partner's database: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column The full response looks like the following:
CommunityOracle User Group CommunityTopliners CommunityOTN Speaker BureauJava CommunityError: You don't have JavaScript enabled. This tool uses JavaScript and much of it will not work correctly without it enabled. Please turn JavaScript back on and reload
Sql State 22003
this page. Please enter a title. You can not post a
Number(10 2) In Oracle
blank message. Please type your message and try again. More discussions in Data Integrator All PlacesBusiness IntelligenceSystem Management oracle alter table modify column and IntegrationData Integrator This discussion is archived 1 2 Previous Next 16 Replies Latest reply on Mar 22, 2010 5:45 AM by jaleyna-JavaNet ORA-01438: value larger than specified http://stackoverflow.com/questions/181344/ora-01438-value-larger-than-specified-precision-allows-for-this-column precision allows for this column 593270 Nov 27, 2007 1:29 PM Hi, Can anybody help.. Created the target table same structure as the source table.Script for the target table is create table TRG_MTL_SYSTEM as select * from MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B.... and I Successfully reversed the source table and target tables into the models. Created one interface for those target https://community.oracle.com/thread/592251 and source tables and mapped columns through auto mapping. When i am executing the interface to load the data to the target , I am getting these error "ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column" while executing the interface. Can anybody suggest me the solution where i did the mistake.. Thanks in Adavance............ 9415Views Tags: none (add) This content has been marked as final. Show 16 replies 1. Re: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column Micropole Nov 27, 2007 1:44 PM (in response to 593270) Which technologies are you using for your Target and your Source ?? Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 2. Re: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column 593270 Nov 27, 2007 2:06 PM (in response to Micropole) Thanks for replay... I am using the Oracle technology. Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 3. Re: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column Micropole Nov 27, 2007 2:13 PM (in response to 593270) Ok so
Early Adopter Program ArcGIS Ideas Esri Support Services ArcGIS Blogs ArcGIS Code Sharing Product Life Cycles Manage Cases Request Case Start Chat Back to results Print Share Is This Content Helpful? Search on GeoNet http://support.esri.com/technical-article/000002107 Submit to ArcGIS Ideas Error: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column Error Message Using cov2sde command may generate the following error: SDE Error(-51) Underlying DBMS error Extended error http://grokbase.com/t/freelists.org/oracle-l/072nnfzje8/how-do-i-get-column-name-that-causing-ora-01438 code(1438): ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column. Cause Attribute values of the coverage in one or more NUMBER fields are too large for the new fields created in how to the Oracle table. Cov2sde first creates an Oracle table to receive the data. This new table's NUMBER fields are defined from the output/display column and decimals fields specified for the coverage's INFO table. To illustrate, assume we have a single parcel coverage with an AREA field whose output/display width is 3, and its decimal column is set to 1 decimal place. When this AREA 01438 oracle error field is added to the new Oracle table it will be defined as NUMBER(3,1). The 3 indicates the maximum number of digits Oracle will store in this number field. The 1 means that one of those three digits is reserved for a position to the right of the decimal point. Thus, if the area value in the coverage is 12.3, it would be a legitimate number, but an area value of 123.4 would not be¹.¹Koch, G., and K. Loney, "Creating, Dropping, and Altering Tables and Views," Oracle: The Complete Reference, Electronic Edition (1997):383. Solution or Workaround Changing the output/display column width in the INFO table to a width larger than the attribute value before loading the coverage into the Oracle table eliminates the error, and should allow the data to load. In the previous example, changing the column width from 3 to 4 or higher will correct the problem.Find offending INFO column(s) and increase output/display width size using ArcCatalog™ or INFO . Note: ArcINFO™ Workstation refers to the column as Output width.ArcInfo™ Desktop refers to the column as Display width. Created: 5/5/2016 Last Modified: 5/5/2016 Article ID: 000002107 Software: ArcSDE
which I can found out the column name causing anORA-01438?I tried tracing the session, unfortunately, the trace file doesn't have anycluses about the column causing this error.Any link or workaround is appreciated.--Best Regards,Syed Jaffar HussainOracle ACE8i,9i & 10g OCP DBAhttp://jaffardba.blogspot.com/http://www.oracle.com/technology/community/oracle_ace/ace1.html#hussain----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently."--http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l reply Tweet Search Discussions Search All Groups oracle-l 14 responses Oldest Nested Mladen Gogala ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS='1438 TRACE NAME ERRORSTACK FOREVER, LEVEL 12'; -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA Video Monitoring Systems 1500 Broadway New York City, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 329-5201 Email: mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Mladen Gogala at Feb 21, 2007 at 4:34 pm ⇧ Syed Jaffar Hussain wrote:Hi List,Is there a way though which I can found out the column name causing anORA-01438? I tried tracing the session, unfortunately, the trace file doesn'thave any cluses about the column causing this error.Any link or workaround is appreciated.ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS='1438 TRACE NAME ERRORSTACK FOREVER, LEVEL 12';--Mladen GogalaSr. Oracle DBAVideo Monitoring Systems1500 BroadwayNew York City, NY 10036Phone: (212) 329-5201Email: mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com--http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l reply | permalink Syed Jaffar Hussain Mladen, Yes, I do set the event to trace the culprit. The problem is that when I enable this event, Oracle is taking around 6 second to return the error msg. on the sql prompt. And ours is a very high OLTP application where around 500 tps take places. We have request Oracle for an enhancement. Because, when constraints violates, Oracle do gives the constrain name and details, likewise, I would like to have so and so column in the particular table is the culprit. Regards Jaffar -- Best Regards, Syed Jaffar Hussain at Feb 21, 2007 at 8:32 pm ⇧ Mladen,Yes, I do set the event to trace the culprit. The problem is that when Ienable this event, Oracle is taking around 6 second to return the error msg.on the sql prompt. And ours is a very high OLTP application where around 500tps take places.We have request Oracle for an enhancement. Because, when constraintsviol