How To Calculate Interobserver Error
Contents |
to calculate inter-observer agreement related with behavioral observations? (lizard stress study) A colleague and I performed a study with lizards, where we subjected them to 4 different types of stress (cold, heat, low frequency noise and high intraobserver error frequency noise). We have videos of the behaviors they expressed during the experiment (flicking, how to calculate interobserver agreement head turns and so on). Now to begin the analysis of the videos, we need to make sure that our observations are intraobserver variability calculation more less the same, so we can exclude differences due observers bias. We have agreed on the behaviors that we are recording and some of them are frequencies of events meanwhile others deal with duration of interobserver variability definition events. So far, we have the data of a section of our recordings that we analyzed separately and right now, we need to statistically probe that the data each one produced has no meaningful differences. Is there any statistical method you recommend? Topics Animal Behavior × 570 Questions 20,415 Followers Follow May 7, 2012 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ 0 / 0 Popular Answers Antoni Espinosa · Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Hello, Recently
Interobserver Variation
I have calculated Kappa index for my observations of a group of mangabeys (Cercocebus atys lunulatus) in Barcelona Zoo. I created an Excel sheet that builds an interaction matrix from the data (actually that was the aim, because if you have many behaviours building the matrix automatically can be helpful) and it calculates Kappa index for two observers or for one in two diferent times. You can see it at: https://sites.google.com/site/nuncobdurat/archivador/CTCPP_calculadora_kappa.xls Instructions are in spanish, tell me if you need any traslation May 7, 2012 Simona Kralj-Fišer · Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts I usually use Cronbach's Alpha (reliability, interclass correlation coefficient), sure it depends if your data are continous or catagorical... May 10, 2012 All Answers (15) Michael Tordoff · Monell Chemical Senses Center Try using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Frequencies of behavioral observations are rarely normally distributed so Pearson correlation coefficients would be inappropriate. The calculations are relatively easy to do and there are on-line calculators you can find by Googling. I would hope for rho coefficients between the two observers of >0.90. If they are much below 0.80 you may have problems convincing reviewers that your scoring system is reliable. May 7, 2012 Teague O'Mara · Max-Planck-Institut für Ornithologie, Teilinstitut Radolfzell Or Cohen's Kappa statistic which is d
& Bioassays Resources...DNA & RNABLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)E-UtilitiesGenBankGenBank: BankItGenBank: SequinGenBank:
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
tbl2asnGenome WorkbenchInfluenza VirusNucleotide DatabasePopSetPrimer-BLASTProSplignReference Sequence (RefSeq)RefSeqGeneSequence Read inter rater reliability Archive (SRA)SplignTrace ArchiveUniGeneAll DNA & RNA Resources...Data & SoftwareBLAST (Basic Local google scholar Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)Cn3DConserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)E-UtilitiesGenBank: BankItGenBank: SequinGenBank: tbl2asnGenome ProtMapGenome WorkbenchPrimer-BLASTProSplignPubChem Structure SearchSNP Submission ToolSplignVector https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_one_is_the_best_way_to_calculate_inter-observer_agreement_related_with_behavioral_observations Alignment Search Tool (VAST)All Data & Software Resources...Domains & StructuresBioSystemsCn3DConserved Domain Database (CDD)Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)Structure (Molecular Modeling Database)Vector Alignment Search Tool (VAST)All Domains & Structures Resources...Genes & ExpressionBioSystemsDatabase of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP)E-UtilitiesGeneGene Expression http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11247333 Omnibus (GEO) Database Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) DatasetsGene Expression Omnibus (GEO) ProfilesGenome WorkbenchHomoloGeneMap ViewerOnline Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)RefSeqGeneUniGeneAll Genes & Expression Resources...Genetics & MedicineBookshelfDatabase of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP)Genetic Testing RegistryInfluenza VirusMap ViewerOnline Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)PubMedPubMed Central (PMC)PubMed Clinical QueriesRefSeqGeneAll Genetics & Medicine Resources...Genomes & MapsDatabase of Genomic Structural Variation (dbVar)GenBank: tbl2asnGenomeGenome ProjectGenome ProtMapGenome WorkbenchInfluenza VirusMap ViewerNucleotide DatabasePopSetProSplignSequence Read Archive (SRA)SplignTrace ArchiveAll Genomes & Maps Resources...HomologyBLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)BLAST Link (BLink)Conserved Domain Database (CDD)Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)Genome ProtMapHomoloGeneProtein ClustersAll Homology Resources...LiteratureBookshelfE-UtilitiesJournals in NCBI DatabasesMeSH DatabaseNCBI HandbookNCBI Help ManualNCBI NewsPubMedPubMed Central (PMC)PubMed Clinical QueriesPubMed HealthAll Literature Resources...ProteinsBioSystemsBLAST (Basic Local Alignment Searc
interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effectsAuthorsAuthors and affiliationsAlvin Enis HouseBetty J. HouseMartha B. CampbellArticleAccepted: 17 September 1980DOI: 10.1007/BF01321350Cite this article as: House, A.E., House, B.J. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01321350 & Campbell, M.B. Journal of Behavioral Assessment (1981) 3: 37. doi:10.1007/BF01321350AbstractSeventeen measures of association for observer reliability (interobserver agreement) are reviewed and computational formulas are given in a common notational system. An empirical comparison of 10 of these measures is made over a range of potential reliability check results. The effects on how to percentage and correlational measures of occurrence frequency, error frequency, and error distribution are examined. The question of which is the “best” measure of interobserver agreement is discussed in terms of critical issues to be consideredKey wordsinterobserver agreementobserver reliabilitymeasures of associationnaturalistic observationinterval-by-interval coding systemsReferencesBear, D. M. Reviewer's comment: Just because it's reliable doesn't mean how to calculate that you can use it.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1977,10, 117–119.Google ScholarChristensen, A. Naturalistic observation of families: A system for random audio recording in the home.Behavior Therapy 1979,10, 418–422.Google ScholarCicchetti, D. V., and Fleiss, J. L. Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic.Applied Psychological Measurement 1977,1, 195–201.Google ScholarClement, P. W. A formula for computing inter-observer agreementPsychological Reports 1976,39, 257–258.Google ScholarCohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960,20, 37–46.Google ScholarCohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin 1968,70, 213–220.Google ScholarCronbach, L. J., Glaser, G. C., Nanda, H., and Rajaratnam, N.The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of General Profiles. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google ScholarEveritt, B. S. Moments of the statistics kappa and weighted kappa.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1968,21, 97–103.Google ScholarEveritt, B. S.The Analysis of Contingency Tables. New York: Wiley, 1977.Google ScholarFarkas, G. M. Correction for bias p
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sun, 16 Oct 2016 02:20:58 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)