How To Correct A Spelling Error In A Quote
Contents |
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About how to correct a quote Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers how to use sic in a quote or posting ads with us English Language & Usage Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ English Language & Usage
What Does Sic Mean In Quote
Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can
How To Use Sic With Multiple Errors
answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Should I fix typos/grammatical errors in quotation? up vote 20 down vote favorite 6 When writing papers, I meet typos/grammatical errors in quotations now and then. Should I correct them, or leave them as they are? quotations editing share|improve this question edited Dec 16 '15 at 0:53 p.s.w.g 6,61522448 asked Mar 17 '11 at 2:20 user3812 4 You how to use sic at the end of a quote should leave quotes as they are. There is always the possibility that the quite is actually correct and you have misunderstood it. If you try to improve a quote, you risk to change it's meaning instead. –Guffa Mar 17 '11 at 7:21 I read an article in the newspaper today which quoted a scientific expert as saying [nuclear] "fusion" when "fission" was correct in the context. I doubt such an expert would make such a fundamental mistake, so the newspaper must have changed it. So +1 @Guffa. –Nathan MacInnes Mar 17 '11 at 15:13 Related question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/16649/… –JYelton Mar 17 '11 at 15:49 4 @Guffa You did that intentionally, didn't you... –MrHen Mar 17 '11 at 16:28 1 @MrHen, nice observation.... –user3812 Mar 18 '11 at 1:08 | show 1 more comment 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 26 down vote accepted When quoting, the convention is to quote the text exactly as it appears in the source. It is common to mark a misspelling (or other problematical word) that might be otherwise thought to be an error by you (the quoter) by following it with "[sic]". The word sic (which is from Latin) means "as such", that is, the apparent problem
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow
What Does (sic) Mean After A Word
the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us English Language how to use sic in apa & Usage Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sic usa linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/16619/should-i-fix-typos-grammatical-errors-in-quotation top How to deal with quoting a grammatical error? up vote 9 down vote favorite What should you do if you’re quoting someone, and that quote has a grammatical error? Say for example that I’m quoting this line from the American Pregnancy Association: The term used for a pregnancy that ends on it’s own, within the first 20 weeks of gestation. The proper way to write this is without the apostrophe. I know that, and you know http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/11857/how-to-deal-with-quoting-a-grammatical-error that, but the Association’s proofreader apparently missed it. The question is what I should do now: how can I quote this without sounding like I’m the one committing a grammatical error? grammar quotes share|improve this question edited Nov 30 '12 at 18:10 tchrist♦ 84.1k20206339 asked Feb 8 '11 at 23:30 chama 241138 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 14 down vote accepted Use the word "sic", which is Latin for "thus". It indicates that the error was in the source material. But beware - it can be considered rude. I would quote the passage thusly: the term used for a pregnancy that ends on it's [sic] own, within the first 20 weeks of gestation. share|improve this answer edited Feb 9 '11 at 14:35 answered Feb 8 '11 at 23:31 Chris B. Behrens 3,4161222 Thanks. That's just what I was looking for. I knew it was something like that, but I couldn't remember what. –chama Feb 8 '11 at 23:33 11 You should put the sic in square brackets. "The pregnancy ended on it's [sic] own." –Robusto Feb 9 '11 at 1:29 4 To add to what Robusto said, you should put anything that wasn't in the original source, and which you've added, in square brackets — including [sic], other explanations added for clarity, whatever. Putting it in () like here
that the quoted matter has been transcribed exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous or archaic spelling, surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might otherwise be taken as an error of transcription. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic usual usage is to inform the reader that any errors or apparent errors in quoted material do not arise from errors in the course of the transcription, but are intentionally reproduced, exactly as they appear in the source text. It is generally placed inside brackets to indicate that it is not part of the quoted matter. Sic may also be used derisively, to call attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or erroneous logic.[2] Look up how to sic in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Contents 1 Etymology and historical usage 1.1 False etymologies 2 Modern usage 2.1 Conventional usage 2.2 To denote archaisms and dialect 2.3 Wordplay 2.4 Form of ridicule 2.5 The "ironic use" of sic 3 Formatting 4 Criticism 5 Alternatives 5.1 Correction 5.2 Recte 5.3 Read 6 See also 7 References Etymology and historical usage[edit] Though occasionally misidentified as an abbreviated word, sic is a Latin adverb used in English as an how to use adverb, and, derivatively, as a noun and a verb.[3] The adverb sic, meaning "intentionally so written", first appeared in English circa 1856.[4] It is derived from the Latin adverb sīc, which means "so, thus, in this manner".[5] According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the verbal form of sic, meaning "to mark with a sic", emerged in 1889, E. Belfort Bax's work in The Ethics of Socialism being an early example.[6] False etymologies[edit] On occasion, sic has been misidentified as the acronym "s.i.c." for "spelled in context", "said in copy", "spelling is correct", "spelled incorrectly", and other phrases.[7] These are all backronyms from sic. Modern usage[edit] Use of sic greatly increased in the mid-twentieth century.[8] For example, in United States state-court opinions before 1944, sic appeared 1,239 times in the Westlaw database; in those from 1945 to 1990, it appeared 69,168 times.[2] The "benighted use" as a form of ridicule, deserved or otherwise, has been cited as a major factor in this increase.[2] The "immoderate" use of sic has created some controversy, leading some editors, including bibliographical scholar Simon Nowell-Smith and literary critic Leon Edel, to speak out against it.[9] Conventional usage[edit] Sic, in its bracketed form, is most often inserted into quoted or reprinted material in order to indicate meticulous accuracy in reproducing the preceding text, despite appearances to the reader of an incorrect or unusual o