How To Fix Error Security Manager Vetoed Action
IP isWhoisCalculatorTool PointsNewsNews tip?ForumsAll ForumsHot TopicsGalleryInfoHardwareAll FAQsSite FAQDSL FAQCable TechAboutcontactabout uscommunityISP FAQAdd ISPISP Ind. ForumsJoin Search similar:Error Message at Shutdown Forums → Social → Open Forum → Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action" uniqs1048 Share « The UK uses a dot "." instead of the colon ":" for time? • DSL loop length and physical cable length » peggypwr1join:2003-10-06Fremont, CA peggypwr1 Member 2013-Sep-16 12:17 am Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action"I'm using 3.6.28 and out of the blue I am reviewing the above message. It is very annoying. I reinstalled Firefox to no avail. Any help? · actions · 2013-Sep-16 12:17 am · Wily_OnePremium Memberjoin:2002-11-24San Jose, CA Wily_One Premium Member 2013-Sep-16 12:36 am Re: Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action&qv3.6.28? You have some updating to do. Current version is 23.0.1. · actions · 2013-Sep-16 12:36 am · justin..needs sleepModjoin:1999-05-282031 justin to peggypwr1 Mod 2013-Sep-16 12:53 am to peggypwr1Re: Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action"It is security manager vetoed action, it might be triggered by adverts in iframes or other uses of javascript not anticipated by this earlier version. I think running such an old version of firefox is asking for trouble. · actions · 2013-Sep-16 12:53 am · dib22join:2002-01-27Kansas City, MO dib22 Member 2013-Sep-16 1:20 am Re: Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action&qsaid by justin: I think running such an old version of firefox is asking for trouble.Agreed.»www.mozilla.org/security ··· ilities/ · actions · 2013-Sep-16 1:20 am · justin..needs sleepModjoin:1999-05-282031113.6 11.2Billion BiPAC 7800NApple AirPort Extreme (2011) justin Mod 2013-Sep-16 1:22 am well they run the latest on that page this is the page to worry about:»www.mozilla.org/security ··· fox.htmledit: shouldn't be too hard it is only a year old.The problem is that nowadays browsers are updated almost continuously. · actions · 2013-Sep-16 1:22 am · La LunaRIP LisaPremium Memberjoin:2001-07-12Holiday, FL La Luna to peggypwr1 Premium Member 2013-Sep-16 4:09 pm to peggypwr1said by peggypwr1:I'm using 3.6.28 and out of the blue
mozillaZine is an independent Mozilla community and advocacy site. We're not affiliated or endorsed by the Mozilla Corporation but we love them just the same. Proudly Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group © 1998-2015 mozillaZine All Rights Reserved
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 120 Star 1,184 Fork 224 https://github.com/greasemonkey/greasemonkey/issues/1448 greasemonkey/greasemonkey Code Issues 133 Pull requests 12 Projects 0 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue eval raises "Security Manager vetoed" exception #1448 Closed carellano001 opened this https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.platform/OMyOcEoLCrM Issue Oct 17, 2011 · 9 comments Projects None yet Labels wontfix Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned 6 participants carellano001 how to commented Oct 17, 2011 In FF3, the following code raises a Security Manager Vetoed exception. This happens in GM 0.9.12 but not in GM 0.9.11. I suppose that this behaviour is related with this change. arantius@de35812#commitcomment-655286 try{ eval("<>>"); }catch(e){alert(e);} Torsten- commented Oct 21, 2011 Same problem here - my script how to fix is broken with 0.9.12 and "Security Manager vetoed" exception. But it seems to differ from browser to browser? Can't reproduce with: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1 Error occure with: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18 Collaborator arantius commented Oct 21, 2011 Torsten: What is your script exactly? A reduced test case like in the original report would be good. carellano: I can't reproduce. That code, in Firefox 3, does not give me any error. Martii commented Oct 22, 2011 Is there some reason why this code wouldn't be used instead? try { eval(<>>.toString()); } catch (e) { alert(e); } I do get the veto of the original code snippet above: try{ eval("<>>"); }catch(e){alert(e);} Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Firefox/3.6.23 Greasemonkey 0.9.12 [Exception... "Security Manager vetoed action" nsresult: "0x80570027 (NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO)" location: "JS fram
von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen