How To Resolve Stack Overflow Error In Android
Contents |
here for a quick overview java.lang.stackoverflowerror in android of the site Help Center Detailed answers to java.lang.stackoverflowerror stack size 8mb android any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this
Java.lang.stackoverflowerror Java
site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us
How To Resolve Stack Overflow Error In Java
Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up fixing the how to resolve java lang stackoverflowerror StackOverflow Error up vote 1 down vote favorite I have developed an application in which i have 4 tabs A,B,C,D. Each of the Tab contains an Activity. In the fourth tab D I have added an ActivityGroup in which I am having 3 more Activities X,Y,Z.In the fourth Tab where I have added the activity group I am getting StackOverflow error.Please help me out in fixing this error. this is my stackTrace:-- 07-15 15:22:45.587: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): Uncaught handler: thread main exiting due to uncaught exception 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): java.lang.StackOverflowError 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:1258) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.drawChild(ViewGroup.java:1529) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:1258) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.drawChild(ViewGroup.java:1529) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:1258) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.drawChild(ViewGroup.java:1529) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:1258) 07-15 15:22:45.677: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(222): a
puts automation in the app First look: Google Cloud Machine Learning soars 7 habits of highly
Java.lang.stackoverflowerror Eclipse
effective developers 10 hard-core coding tips for faster Python More stack overflow error java recursion Insider Sign Out Search for Suggestions for you Insider email Core Java All Core Java how to increase stack size in java Agile Development Java Concurrency Java Language Java Platform Java Security Programming Careers Testing and Debugging Enterprise Java All Enterprise Java Big Data Cloud Computing Data http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6705425/fixing-the-stackoverflow-error Analytics Development Tools Java APIs Java App Dev Java Web Development Open Source Scripting and JVM Languages Learn Java All Learn Java Design Patterns Mobile Java All Mobile Java Java Android Developers Java iOS Developers News Features How-Tos Blogs Resources/White Papers Newsletters × Close Home Dustin's Software Development Cogitations and Speculations http://www.javaworld.com/community/node/3153 By Dustin Marx About | A software developer's public collection of tips and tricks, real-world solutions, and industry commentary related to Java programming. How-To Diagnosing and Resolving StackOverflowError More like this Effective Java NullPointerException Handling JavaScript in Java Writing good unit tests, Part 2: Follow your nose Email a friend To Use commas to separate multiple email addresses From Privacy Policy Thank you Your message has been sent. Sorry There was an error emailing this page. Comments JavaWorld | Jul 4, 2009 3:04 PM PT Comments A recent JavaWorld Community forum message (Stack Overflow after instantiating new object) reminded me that the basics of the StackOverflowError are not always understood well by people new to Java. Fortunately, the StackOverflowError is one of the easier of the runtime errors to debug and
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Programmers Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top What methods are there to avoid a stack overflow in a recursive algorithm? up vote 31 down vote favorite 13 Question What are the possible ways to solve a stack overflow caused by an recursive algorithm? Example I'm trying to solve Project Euler problem 14 and decided to try it with a recursive algorithm. However, the program stops with a java.lang.StackOverflowError. Understandably. The algorithm indeed overflowed the stack because I tried to generate a Collatz sequence for a very large number. Solutions So I was wondering: what standard ways are there to solve a stack overflow assuming your recursive algorithm was written correctly and would always end up overflowing the stack? Two concepts that came to mind were: tail recursion iteration Are ideas (1) and (2) correct? Are there other options? Edit It would help to see some code, preferably in Java, C#, Groovy or Scala. Perhaps don't use the Project Euler problem mentioned above so it won't get spoiled for others, but take some other algorithm. Factorial maybe, or something similar. algorithms computer-science recursion tail-call share|improve this question edited Feb 5 at 18:33 Randy Marsh 1055 asked Apr 11 '13 at 10:46 Lernkurve 3541312 3 Iteration. Memoisation –James Apr 11 '13 at 10:50 2 Obviously, Memoization only works when there actually is repeated calculation. –Jörg W Mittag Apr 11 '13 at 12:06 2 also worth noting that not all language implementations can do tail recursion optimizations anyway –jk. Apr 11 '13 at 12:22 2 This would probably be better solved with corecursion than recursion. –Jörg W Mittag Apr 11 '13 at 13:31 3 If you are working from the number less than 1,000,000 and going to 1, the answer to this question involves about 500 steps to reach 1. This should not tax recursion given a small stack frame. --- If you are attempting to solve starting at 1, then foll