Average Rate Of Human Error
Contents |
across studies. However only fairly simple actions are used in the denominator. The Klemmer and Snyder study shows human error rate in data entry that much lower error rates are possible--in this case for people whose human error rate statistics job consisted almost entirely of data entry. The error rate for more complex logic errors is about human error rate percentage 5%, based primarily on data on other pages, especially the program development page. Study Detail Error Rate Baddeley & Longman [1973] Entering mail codes. Errors after correction.
Human Error Rate Tables
Per mail code. 0.5% Chedru & Geschwind [1972] Grammatical errors per word 1.1% Dhillon [1986] Reading a gauge incorrectly. Per read. 0.5% Dremen and Berry [1995] Percentage error in security analysts' earnings forecasts for reporting earnings. 1980 / 1985 / 1990. That is, size of error rather than frequency of error. 30% 52% 65% Edmondson [1996] Errors per medication acceptable human error rate in hospital, based on data presented in the paper. Per dose. 1.6% Grudin [1983] Error rate per keystroke for six expert typists. Told not to correct errors, although some did. Per keystroke. 1% Hotopf [1980] S sample (speech errors). Per word 0.2% Hotopf [1980] W sample (written exam). Per word 0.9% Hotopf [1980] 10 undergraduates write for 30 minutes, grammatical and spelling errors per word 1.6% Klemmer [1962] Keypunch machine operators, errors per character 0.02% to 0.06% Klemmer [1962] Bank machine operators, errors per check 0.03% Kukich [1992] Nonword spelling errors in uses of telecommunication devices for the deaf. 40,000 words (strings). Per string. 6% Mathias, MacKenzie & Buxton [1996] 10 touch typists averaging 58 words per minute. No error correction. In last session. Per keystroke. 4% Mattson & Baars [1992] Typing study with secretaries and clerks. Nonsense words. Per nonsense word. 7.4% Melchers & Harrington [1982] Students performing calculator tasks and table lookup tasks. Per multipart calculation. Per table lookup. Etc. 1%-2% Mitton [1987] Study of 170,016 errors in high-school essays,
the purposes of evaluating the probability of a human error occurring throughout the completion of a specific task. From such average human error rate data entry analyses measures can then be taken to reduce the likelihood
Human Error Probability Table
of errors occurring within a system and therefore lead to an improvement in the overall levels
Human Error Rate Prediction
of safety. There exist three primary reasons for conducting an HRA; error identification, error quantification and error reduction. As there exist a number of techniques used http://panko.shidler.hawaii.edu/HumanErr/Basic.htm for such purposes, they can be split into one of two classifications; first generation techniques and second generation techniques. First generation techniques work on the basis of the simple dichotomy of ‘fits/doesn’t fit’ in the matching of the error situation in context with related error identification and quantification and second generation techniques are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technique_for_human_error-rate_prediction more theory based in their assessment and quantification of errors. ‘HRA techniques have been utilised in a range of industries including healthcare, engineering, nuclear, transportation and business sector; each technique has varying uses within different disciplines. THERP models human error probabilities (HEPs) using a fault-tree approach, in a similar way to an engineering risk assessment, but also accounts for performance shaping factors (PSFs) that may influence these probabilities. The probabilities for the human reliability analysis event tree (HRAET), which is the primary tool for assessment, are nominally calculated from the database developed by the authors Swain and Guttman; local data e.g. from simulators or accident reports may however be used instead. The resultant tree portrays a step by step account of the stages involved in a task, in a logical order. The technique is known as a total methodology [1] as it simultaneously manages a number of different activities including task analysis, error identification, representation in for
The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Manager and http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=37934 Management Related Issues "Human Error" statistics Forum User Name Keep Me Logged In Password Register Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s) Some people have been having Password Reset issues (especially "Hotmail" accounts). If you have a problem, contact the Peachfarm Internet Properties IT techs human error directly at peachfarmllc {at} neomailbox.ch (Switzerland) and we will resolve your problem(s) within 12 hours. Community Links Social Groups Pictures & Albums Registered Visitors Search the Cove Forum Discussion Threads Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Forum Search Search Elsmar Unanswered Threads Find All Thanked Posts Search Blogs Tag Search human error rate Advanced Forum Search Go to Page... "Human Error" statistics Elsmar XML RSS Feed Monitor the Elsmar Forum Monitor New Forum Posts Sponsor Links Courtesy Quick Links Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge: International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies ASQ - American Society for Quality International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information Howard'sInternational Quality Services Marcelo Antunes'SQR Consulting, andMedical Devices Expert Forum Bob DoeringBob Doering's Blogs and,Correct SPC - Precision Machining NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers Quality Digest IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes Post Number #1 16th November 2009, 12:30 PM Sarge Total Posts: 24 "Human Error" statistics Does any one have a quotable reference for statistics related to human error? I'm looking for
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 01 Oct 2016 20:18:18 GMT by s_hv999 (squid/3.5.20)