Java Script Error Correct
Contents |
the ability to create errors. My first reaction to the throw operator in Java was, "well that's stupid, why would you ever javascript validator online want to cause an error?" Errors were the enemy to me, something
Javascript Form Validator
I sought to avoid, so the ability to cause an error seemed like a useless and dangerous aspect throw new error javascript of the language. I thought it was dumb to include the same operator in JavaScript, a language that people just didn't understand in the first place. Now with a great
Jquery Code Validator
deal of experience under my belt, I'm a big fan of throwing my own errors. Doing so can lead to easier debugging and code maintenance when done properly. When programming, an error occurs when something unexpected happens. Maybe the incorrect value was passed into a function or a mathematical operation had an invalid operand. Programming languages define a base jquery lint set of rules that, when deviated from, result in errors so that the developer can fix the code. Debugging would be nearly impossible if errors weren't thrown and reported back to you. If everything failed silently, it would take you a long time to notice that there was an issue in the first place, let alone isolate and fix it. Errors are the friends of developers, not enemies. The problem with errors is that they tend to pop up in unexpected places and at unexpected times. To make matters worse, the default error messages are usually too terse to really explain what went wrong. JavaScript error messages are notoriously uninformative and cryptic (especially in Internet Explorer), which only compounds the problem. Imagine if an error popped up with a message that said, "this function failed because this happened." Instantly, your debugging task becomes easier. This is the advantage of throwing your own errors. It helps to think of errors as built-in failure cases. It's always easier to plan for a failure at a particular point in co
statementmultiple varssingle quote stringsthiswhitespace messNumber...Maximum line lengthMaximum warningsGlobal variables...
as expected is a good start. Making your programs behave properly when encountering unexpected conditions is where it really gets challenging. ¶ The problematic situations that a program can encounter fall into two categories: Programmer http://eloquentjavascript.net/1st_edition/chapter5.html mistakes and genuine problems. If someone forgets to pass a required argument to a function, that is an example of the first kind of problem. On the other hand, if a program asks the user to enter a name and it gets back an empty string, that is something the programmer can not prevent. ¶ In general, one deals with programmer errors by finding and fixing them, and with genuine errors by having script error the code check for them and perform some suitable action to remedy them (for example, asking for the name again), or at least fail in a well-defined and clean way. ¶ It is important to decide into which of these categories a certain problem falls. For example, consider our old power function:function power(base, exponent) { var result = 1; for (var count = 0; count < exponent; count++) result *= base; return result; java script error } ¶ When some geek tries to call power("Rabbit", 4), that is quite obviously a programmer error, but how about power(9, 0.5)? The function can not handle fractional exponents, but, mathematically speaking, raising a number to the halfth power is perfectly reasonable (Math.pow can handle it). In situations where it is not entirely clear what kind of input a function accepts, it is often a good idea to explicitly state the kind of arguments that are acceptable in a comment. ¶ If a function encounters a problem that it can not solve itself, what should it do? In chapter 4 we wrote the function between:function between(string, start, end) { var startAt = string.indexOf(start) + start.length; var endAt = string.indexOf(end, startAt); return string.slice(startAt, endAt); } ¶ If the given start and end do not occur in the string, indexOf will return -1 and this version of between will return a lot of nonsense: between("Your mother!", "{-", "-}") returns "our mother". ¶ When the program is running, and the function is called like that, the code that called it will get a string value, as it expected, and happily continue doing something with it. But the value is wrong, so whatever it ends up doing with it will also be wrong. And if you are unlucky, this wrongness only ca