Quote Spelling Error
Contents |
Writing Services Links Contact E-Newsletter Signup Facebook Twitter YouTube Enable JavaScript Uh oh! It looks like you have JavaScript turned off. While most of our site should function with out, we recommend turning it back on for a better experience. Hide Notice what does sic mean in quote Remembering Jane Straus | May 18, 1954—February 25, 2011 | Author of the original Blue what does (sic) mean after a word Book of Grammar and Punctuation Facebook Twitter YouTube E-Newsletter Signup Menu Search Submit Subscribe to Quizzes Quiz Subscriber Login Search Submit Home how to correct a quote Order the Book English Rules Grammar Rules Punctuation Rules Capitalization Rules Rules for Writing Numbers Confusing Words and Homonyms Quizzes FREE Quizzes Subscription Quizzes Grammar Blog English Usage Videos Writing Services Links Contact Using [sic] Properly
How To Use Sic With Multiple Errors
Sic is a Latin term meaning "thus." It is used to indicate that something incorrectly written is intentionally being left as it was in the original. Sic is usually italicized and always surrounded by brackets to indicate that it was not part of the original. Place [sic] right after the error. Example: She wrote, “They made there [sic] beds.” Note: The correct sentence should have been, “They made their beds.” Why use [sic] at all? sic erat scriptum Why not just make the correction? If you are quoting material, it is generally expected that you will transcribe it exactly as it appeared in the original. The word sic is also a command to attack (used especially in commanding a dog). The past tense is either sicced or sicked. Examples: Sic ‘em, Fido. Fido sicced (or sicked) the burglar. Note: With this meaning, the word is not italicized or enclosed in brackets. Be careful, however, because the word sick, meaning ill, is also a homonym of sic. Example: Ananda felt sick with the flu yesterday. Pop Quiz Place [sic] where needed. 1. I can lend you no more then ten dollars. 2. Who’s turn is it to speak? 3. I don’t know witch way to turn. 4. How did the weather effect your vacation plans? 5. Don’t you think that every one should attend the meeting? Pop Quiz Answers 1. I can lend you no more then [sic] ten dollars. (than) 2. Who’s [sic] turn is it to speak? (Whose) 3. I don’t know witch [sic] way to turn. (which) 4. How did the weather effect [sic] your vacation plans? (affect) 5. Don’t you think that every one [sic] should attend the meeting? (everyone) Posted on Sunday, October 7, 2007, at 11:17 pm101 Comments on Using [sic] Properly 101 respons
that the quoted matter has been transcribed exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous or how to use sic at the end of a quote archaic spelling, surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might
Opposite Of Sic
otherwise be taken as an error of transcription. The usual usage is to inform the reader that
What Does (sic) Mean In A Sentence
any errors or apparent errors in quoted material do not arise from errors in the course of the transcription, but are intentionally reproduced, exactly as they appear in http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/definitions/sic/ the source text. It is generally placed inside brackets to indicate that it is not part of the quoted matter. Sic may also be used derisively, to call attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or erroneous logic.[2] Look up sic in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Contents 1 Etymology and historical usage 1.1 False etymologies 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic Modern usage 2.1 Conventional usage 2.2 To denote archaisms and dialect 2.3 Wordplay 2.4 Form of ridicule 2.5 The "ironic use" of sic 3 Formatting 4 Criticism 5 Alternatives 5.1 Correction 5.2 Recte 5.3 Read 6 See also 7 References Etymology and historical usage[edit] Though occasionally misidentified as an abbreviated word, sic is a Latin adverb used in English as an adverb, and, derivatively, as a noun and a verb.[3] The adverb sic, meaning "intentionally so written", first appeared in English circa 1856.[4] It is derived from the Latin adverb sīc, which means "so, thus, in this manner".[5] According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the verbal form of sic, meaning "to mark with a sic", emerged in 1889, E. Belfort Bax's work in The Ethics of Socialism being an early example.[6] False etymologies[edit] On occasion, sic has been misidentified as the acronym "s.i.c." for "spelled in context", "said in copy", "spelling is correct", "spelled incorrectly", and other phrases.[7] These are all backronyms from sic. Modern usage[edit]
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/16619/should-i-fix-typos-grammatical-errors-in-quotation company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us English Language & Usage Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-286266.html and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Should I what does fix typos/grammatical errors in quotation? up vote 20 down vote favorite 6 When writing papers, I meet typos/grammatical errors in quotations now and then. Should I correct them, or leave them as they are? quotations editing share|improve this question edited Dec 16 '15 at 0:53 p.s.w.g 6,62522448 asked Mar 17 '11 at 2:20 user3812 4 You should leave quotes as they are. There is always the possibility that the quite is actually correct and you have misunderstood what does (sic) it. If you try to improve a quote, you risk to change it's meaning instead. –Guffa Mar 17 '11 at 7:21 I read an article in the newspaper today which quoted a scientific expert as saying [nuclear] "fusion" when "fission" was correct in the context. I doubt such an expert would make such a fundamental mistake, so the newspaper must have changed it. So +1 @Guffa. –Nathan MacInnes Mar 17 '11 at 15:13 Related question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/16649/… –JYelton Mar 17 '11 at 15:49 4 @Guffa You did that intentionally, didn't you... –MrHen Mar 17 '11 at 16:28 1 @MrHen, nice observation.... –user3812 Mar 18 '11 at 1:08 | show 1 more comment 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 26 down vote accepted When quoting, the convention is to quote the text exactly as it appears in the source. It is common to mark a misspelling (or other problematical word) that might be otherwise thought to be an error by you (the quoter) by following it with "[sic]". The word sic (which is from Latin) means "as such", that is, the apparent problem occurred in the original text. The square brackets indicate that the text was added by the quoter. For instance, Our massage treatments help relive[sic] your pain. share|improve this answer answered Mar 17 '11 at 2:41 mgkrebbs 5,8792038 10 @mgkrebbs Awesome example. –jbe
correct spelling errors when quoting written works? 2) Along the same line of reasoning, when writing in a regionalized version of the English language, such as in Canada, is it acceptable to change the spelling of British or American English words to the accepted Canadian spelling when quoting a written work? muldoonthief11-12-2004, 12:59 PM1) The accepted method is to use [sic], indicating the error was in the original, not in your transcription. Example: "He slamed [sic] the door in her fase [sic]." See this (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sic), second definition. Basically it's your way of saying "I know there's a spelling (grammar, etc) error here, but since I'm quoting, I want to leave it in, but I don't want you the reader to think I made the mistake". 2) I doubt it. The spelling differences between British, Canadian and American English are pretty minor (minour?), so there's usually no chance of confusion twickster11-12-2004, 01:11 PMI'll often "correct" things to American English, esp. when the quoted material is likely to have originally been delivered orally. For instance, if a British source were quoting a quip by whoever -- Christ Rock, say -- and they quote him as saying something about "the colour grey," I'll change it back to "the color gray," since that's how he'd spell it if he were writing it down. OTOH, my usage is mostly casual/vernacular [puzzle stuff], and I don't follow the rigorous citation rules I learned in academia. Otto11-12-2004, 01:22 PMIt is also acceptable in the first instance to make the correction in brackets, turning "He slamed the door in her fase" to "He [slammed] the door in her [face]." This is less common than using [sic]. It is more commonly used (usually in journalism) for clarifying passages with pronouns. So if for example the text was "The Widow Simmons sought out the governor in his office to beg him to intervene. He slammed the door in her face." and you were only quoting the second sentence you might write "[The governor] slammed the door in her face." For the second, I wouldn't ever change a regional spellin