Definition Human Error Computer Risk
Contents |
on Slideshare Security Intelligence Analysis and Insight for Information Security Professionals Toggle navigation Search for: Search Expand News Topics Industries X-Force Research definition of human error in aviation Media Events & Webinars Home > Topics > CISO > How
Human Error Definition Science
to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security
Human Error Chemistry Definition
Incidents January 13, 2015 | By Nicole van Deursen Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human
Systematic Error Definition
Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security human error examples Incidents on LinkedIn According to the 2014 IBM Chief Information Security Officer Assessment, 95 percent of information security incidents involve human error. Human error is not only the most important factor affecting security, but it is also a key factor in aviation accidents and in medical errors. Information security risk managers and chief information security officers can benefit from the insights of studies on the human factor within these industries to reduce human error related to security. What Is Human Error? Human errors are usually defined as circumstances in which planned actions, decisions or behaviors reduce — or have the potential to reduce — quality, safety and security. Examples of human error involved in information security include the following: System misconfiguration; Poor patch management; Use of default usernames and passwords or easy-to-guess passwords; Lost devices; Disclosure of information via an incorrect email address; Double-clicking on an unsafe URL or attachment; Sharing passwords with others; Leaving compu
Island accident), aviation (see pilot error), space exploration (e.g., the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster and Space Shuttle Columbia disaster), and medicine (see medical error). Prevention of human error is generally human error synonym seen as a major contributor to reliability and safety of (complex) systems. Contents 1 human error theory Definition 2 Performance 3 Categories 4 Sources 5 Controversies 6 See also 7 References Definition[edit] Human error means that something human error threat to information security has been done that was "not intended by the actor; not desired by a set of rules or an external observer; or that led the task or system outside its acceptable limits".[1] In https://securityintelligence.com/how-to-reduce-human-error-in-information-security-incidents/ short, it is a deviation from intention, expectation or desirability.[1] Logically, human actions can fail to achieve their goal in two different ways: the actions can go as planned, but the plan can be inadequate (leading to mistakes); or, the plan can be satisfactory, but the performance can be deficient (leading to slips and lapses).[2][3] However, a mere failure is not an error if there had been no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_error plan to accomplish something in particular.[1] Performance[edit] Human error and performance are two sides of the same coin: "human error" mechanisms are the same as "human performance" mechanisms; performance later categorized as 'error' is done so in hindsight:[4][5] therefore actions later termed "human error" are actually part of the ordinary spectrum of human behaviour. The study of absent-mindedness in everyday life provides ample documentation and categorization of such aspects of behavior. While human error is firmly entrenched in the classical approaches to accident investigation and risk assessment, it has no role in newer approaches such as resilience engineering.[6] Categories[edit] There are many ways to categorize human error.[7][8] exogenous versus endogenous (i.e., originating outside versus inside the individual)[9] situation assessment versus response planning[10] and related distinctions in errors in problem detection (also see signal detection theory) errors in problem diagnosis (also see problem solving) errors in action planning and execution[11] (for example: slips or errors of execution versus mistakes or errors of intention[12][13]) By level of analysis; for example, perceptual (e.g., optical illusions) versus cognitive versus communication versus organizational. Sources[edit] The cognitive study of human error is a very active research field, including work related to limits of memory and
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree http://www.slideshare.net/Dushyant_kalchuri/human-factor-affecting-reliability-safety to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. SlideShare Explore Search You Upload Login Signup Home Technology Education More Topics For Uploaders Get Started Tips & Tricks Tools Human Error & Risk Factor Affecting Reliability & Safety Upcoming SlideShare Loading in …5 × 1 1 of 46 Like this presentation? Why human error not share! Share Email Human Error Prevention byToru Nakata 21261views Not an alien of extraordinary abili... byJoe W 312views Ohsms geotech risk_acg_fillseminar_... byAlex Atkins 艾丽克斯 ... 349views Cessna air crash (with animated sim... byNoman Khan - MBA ... 1035views Safety Management Systems (SMS) Exp... byBrian Bowie 1002views Human failure (LSCITS EngD 2012) byIan Sommerville 1291views Share SlideShare Facebook Twitter definition human error LinkedIn Google+ Email Email sent successfully! Embed Size (px) Start on Show related SlideShares at end WordPress Shortcode Link Human Error & Risk Factor Affecting Reliability & Safety 1,503 views Share Like Dushyant Kalchuri, M.Tech. in Production Engineering Follow 0 0 0 Published on May 29, 2015 Many system reliability predictive methods are based solely on equipment failures, neglecting the human component of man–machine systems (MMS). These methods do not consider the identification of the root causes of human errors. Accelerating technological development leads to an increased importance of safety aspects for organizations as well as for their environment. Therefore, especially in the case of high hazard organizations an expanded view of safety – system safety including human factors is needed. These organizations need appropriate structures as well as rules for the treatment of safety relevant actions or tasks. The system safety approach is reflected in the recent developmental stage in safety research, which started with a focus on technology and its extension to human errors, socio-technical systems and recently to the inter-organizational perspective. Accident causatio