Human Error And Teaching
in the Optimization of Processing Parameters for Green Fiber p.1596 Design Optimization of Processing Parameters for Polypropylene Fiber Based on the Taguchi Method p.1600 Effect of Mn, Si on Varistor-Dielectric Characteristics of Nb-doped SrTiO3 Ceramics p.1604 The Probability Analysis of Human Error in Teaching p.1611 The Research of Inspiring Students’ Thinking in Engineering Specialized Courses Teaching p.1615 Animation Design and Exploration of Experimental Teaching in Analog Electronic Technology p.1619 Study on Practical Method of Mechanical Engineering Management Based on Virtual Sandbox Approaches p.1624 Exploring the Learning Effectiveness of Students with Different Free Choice Cooperative Learning Values: Taking Example of how Operating Optical Time-Domain Reflect Meter Tackle the Optical Fiber Circuit Measurement Problem p.1628 Home>Applied Mechanics and Materials>Measurement Technology and its Application>The Probability Analysis of Human Error in... Paper Title: The Probability Analysis of Human Error in Teaching Abstract This paper thoroughly analyzed the human error in teaching work of colleges and universities, discussed its causes, mode and consequences, proposed the probability analysis methods. The analysis can be treated as a reference to prevent, control and management human error in teaching work for colleges and universities. Info Add to Cart Periodical Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 239-240) Main Theme Measurement Technology and its Application Chapter Chapter 12: Engineering Education Edited by Prasad Yarlagadda and Yun-Hae Kim Pages 1611-1614 DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.239-240.1611 Citation W. J. Yang, P. X. Jiang, "The Probability Analysis of Human Error in Teaching", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 239-240, pp. 1611-1614, 2013 Online since December 2012 Authors Wei Jun Yang, Peng Xiao Jiang Keywords Human Error, Probability Analysis, Teaching Export RIS, BibTeX Price € 30,00 Share First page preview Add to Cart References In order to see related information, you need to Login. Cited by In order to see related information, you need to Login. Related Articles Fault Tree Analysis of “Mistakes, Forgetfulness, and Negligence” Accidents in ATC Authors: Ya Qing Chen, Shi Gang Li, Xin He Abstract:The "mistakes, forgetfulness, and negligence" accidents in Air Traffic Control (ATC) have a great impact on flight safety. On the basis of... 924 Research of Prevention Methods and Measures of Human Error in Teaching Quality Control Au
Apply Now Graduate Destinations Student views FAQ New Students Current Research Students Current Taught Students Distinction Projects UCLIC Alumni Research Affective Computing Health and Wellbeing Collaboration & Communication Interactions in the Wild Designing Future Interfaces Educational Technologies Persuasive Technologies Publications About us Collaborate with us Research Collaborations Teaching Collaborations UCLIC's History News, Events, Seminars News Events Seminars Jobs Home People Study Research Publications About us News, Events, Seminars Home http://www.scientific.net/AMM.239-240.1611.pdf Publications Errordiary: Support for Teaching Human Error Errordiary: Support for Teaching Human Error Sarah Wiseman, Sandy Gould, Dominic Furniss, Anna Cox in Conference proceeding, CHI 2012 Workshop: A Contextualised Curriculum for HCI Abstract Understanding human error is an important part of making good choices about interaction design. In this https://uclic.ucl.ac.uk/publications/408364 paper we report an innovative approach to the teaching of human error. Errordiary is an online repository of the funny, frustrating and sometimes fatal human errors that happen on a daily basis. Students engage with these real-life cases of human error and are challenged to classify them. This raises awareness of everyday human error, teaches students about the psychology of human error, and gives students the experience of dealing with the difficulties of applying classification schemes to real world data. Parent Departments University College London UCL Computer Science UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences Collaborations ICRI UCL Institute of Digital Health Connect with us About UCLIC Meet UCLIC people UCL Interaction Centre - University College London, 2nd floor 66-72 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT Tel: +44 (0) 20 3108 7050 © 2001-2016 UCLIC Disclaimer Freedom of Information Accessibility Privacy Cookies Contact Us Intranet Top
lot of posts this week about security online and the importance of strong passwords and being aware of what you post, where, along with what accounts you have. All of which is important, but there's one https://www.coetail.com/kmatthews/2015/04/19/human-error-vs-a-computerised-world/ important thing that is often missed when talking about online security. You can https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221752974_Human_Error_and_Patient_Safety_Interdisciplinary_Course put all the resources you want into creating a good password, but what most people have to worry about isn't hackers cracking passwords (although if you have the password "1234" or "password," then maybe you should reconsider!) Most people are more at risk from human error: in a school setting, that's often telling someone their password human error in confidence, writing it down somewhere "safe," or leaving themselves logged in. Despite teaching classes about password security and underlining logging out as a critical step in shutting down a shared laptop, that's what Gr4 at my school has been struggling with most this year. The laptops are fine - the kids are in the habit of logging out every time, now, and it's easy to remember. The iPads, on human error and the other hand, are designed more for a single user than a shared class set over 5 classes. https://www.flickr.com/photos/pestoverde/15463556650 It's happened again and again over the past few weeks. The kids leave themselves logged into google drive: someone uses their account to share a pointless document with the entire school. They leave themselves logged into Gmail: someone uses their account to email their teacher or friends using inappropriate language because they know it will be flagged and blamed on the original user. Each time, the teachers have to become detectives, using time stamps to figure out who was actually using the iPads at that particular time. It doesn't matter if their password is "password," "football43" or a passphrase, they're learning that it's critical to be aware of human error, and keep their passwords private. Most of all, though, they're learning to remind each other to LOG OUT! April 19, 2015 in CoETAIL Online4, Course 2. Tags: Course 2, digital literacy Related posts SAMR report card Course 2 Final Project: From Plagiarism to Production Changing the world Post navigation ←Stranger Danger Time to re-mix→ One thought on “Human error vs a computerised world” Jocelyn Sutherland says: April 30, 2015 at 10:01 am Hi @kmatthews thanks for this v
Request full-text Human Error and Patient Safety: Interdisciplinary CourseArticle in Teaching and Learning in Medicine 24(1):18-25 · January 2012 with 20 ReadsDOI: 10.1080/10401334.2012.641482 · Source: PubMed1st Augustine R Wilson2nd Peter J Fabri3rd Jay WolfsonAbstractThe medical community has only recently begun to address how human error affects patient safety. In order to confront human error in medicine, there is a need to teach students who are entering the health professions how potential errors may manifest and train them to prevent or mitigate these problems. The objective is to describe a semester-long, interdisciplinary, human error and patient safety course taught at the University of South Florida. Six interdisciplinary groups, composed of students from five of the university's colleges, were formed. The curriculum consisted of expert lecturers, readings, case studies, and analysis of patient safety problems. Students were evaluated based on their group's work on the final project and peer evaluations. Nursing students scored the highest in each category evaluated. Physicians and medical students had the lowest evaluations in team participation and active engagement. All students rated the course highly and indicated that it enhanced their ability to work in interprofessional settings. The students showed improved knowledge and substantive skill level relative to patient safety and human error concepts. Working in interdisciplinary teams gave the students a better understanding of the role each discipline can have in improving health care systems and health care delivery.Do you want to read the rest of this article?Request full-text CitationsCitations3ReferencesReferences16Crossing professional barriers with peer-assisted learn