Human Error Computer
Contents |
on Slideshare Security Intelligence Analysis and Insight for Information Security Professionals Toggle navigation Search for: Search Expand News Topics Industries X-Force Research Media Events & examples of human error in information technology Webinars Home > Topics > CISO > How to Reduce Human human error threat to information security Error in Information Security Incidents How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents January 13, human error vs computer error 2015 | By Nicole van Deursen Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents human error cyber security on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn According to the 2014 IBM
What Are Some Basic Guidelines For Protecting Your Computer From Security Risk?
Chief Information Security Officer Assessment, 95 percent of information security incidents involve human error. Human error is not only the most important factor affecting security, but it is also a key factor in aviation accidents and in medical errors. Information security risk managers and chief information security officers can benefit from the insights of studies on the human factor within these industries to reduce human error related to security. What Is Human Error? Human errors are usually defined as circumstances in which planned actions, decisions or behaviors reduce — or have the potential to reduce — quality, safety and security. Examples of human error involved in information security include the following: System misconfiguration; Poor patch management; Use of default usernames and passwords or easy-to-guess passwords; Lost devices; Disclosure of information via an incorrect email address; Double-clicking on an unsafe URL or attachment; Sharing passwords with others; Leaving computers unattended when outside the workplace; Using personally owned mobile devices that connect to the organization's
Reviews In-depth App Business travel Innovation at Work Leadership Whitepapers You are here:Home Security News Human error biggest threat to computer security Human error biggest threat to computer security Share twitter linkedin facebook google+ email Rene Millman News 19 Jun, 2007
How To Reduce Human Error In The Workplace
New DTI report finds that most people never change their password. A third write them data breach human error down on paper. The biggest risk to an organisation's network security is human error, according to a new report. The research by how would you protect your computer from human errors? the Department of Trade and Industry found that over a third of respondents either wrote down their password on a piece of paper or recorded it somewhere on their computer. The study also found that nearly two-thirds https://securityintelligence.com/how-to-reduce-human-error-in-information-security-incidents/ of the 1800 UK adults questioned said they never changed their passwords. Minister for Science and Innovation Malcolm Wicks said that the survey found that a large number of people were "careless with passwords, unwittingly exposing themselves and their company to fraud and theft." He added that the UK lost £440 million to credit card fraud last year and that 62 per cent of companies experienced a network security incident. Wicks said that this was http://www.itpro.co.uk/115920/human-error-biggest-threat-to-computer-security a problem that needed to be fixed. "Network security is also a major growth area where the UK has a good opportunity to become a global leader if we develop new technology to give us a competitive edge," said Wicks. The department has embarked on four projects aimed at increasing network security by cutting down the risk of human error. Each of the projects will use behavioural science to tackle human error. The DTI has given the projects £4 million in total. Among the successful projects are a project, run by BAE Systems and Loughborough University aimed at developing new ways of assessing an organisation's security risk and the human factors involved. Also, another project run by HP, Merrill Lynch, the University of Bath, the University of Newcastle and University College London will develop a predictive framework to assess the effectiveness security policies that regulate interactions between people and information systems. The other two projects will look at digital communication analysis to look for potential security threats and tools to identify human vulnerabilities in network security. The projects are part of the DTI's Network Security Innovation Platform, which was set up to develop new ideas to improve network security. The DTI said that it estimated that development of this research could represent an extra £125 million market for businesses in
iTunes or Google Play,or view within your browser. More information here Failure and Recovery PDF December 6, 2004Volume 2, issue http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1036497 8 Coping with Human Error Errors Happen. How to Deal. Aaron B. Brown, IBM Research Human operator error is one of the most insidious sources of failure and data loss in today's IT environments. In early 2001, Microsoft suffered a nearly 24-hour outage in its Web properties as a result of a human error made while configuring a name resolution human error system. Later that year, an hour of trading on the Nasdaq stock exchange was disrupted because of a technician's mistake while testing a development system. More recently, human error has been blamed for outages in instant messaging networks, for security and privacy breaches, and for banking system failures. Although these scenarios are not as spectacularly catastrophic as their analogues in human error in other engineering disciplines--the meltdown of the Chernobyl nuclear plant or the grounding of the Exxon Valdez oil tanker, for example--their societal consequences can be nearly as severe, causing financial uncertainty, disruption to communication, and corporate instability. It is therefore critical that the designers, architects, implementers, and operators of today's IT infrastructures be aware of the human error problem and build in mechanisms for tolerating and coping with the errors that will inevitably occur. This article discusses some of the options available for embedding "coping skills" into an IT system. THE INEVITABILITY OF HUMAN ERROR Human error happens for many reasons, but in the end it almost always comes down to a mismatch between a human operator's mental model of the IT environment and the environment's actual state. Sometimes this confusion arises from poorly designed status feedback mechanisms, such as the perplexing error messages that Paul Maglio and Eser Kandogan discuss elsewhere in this issue (see "Error Messages: What's the Problem?" on page 50), but other times the mismatch simply arises from a lack of experience on the operator's p