Human Error In Decision Making
Contents |
material JEL Classification NEP reports Subscribe to new research Search Pub compilations Reading lists MyIDEAS More options are now at bottom of page IDEAS is a service hosted by the Research Division of skill rule knowledge based errors the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis You can create a compilation of systematic human error reduction and prediction all publications of a group of people, say alumni of a program, your students or members of an association. rasmussen human error Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/ Share: MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper Human Errors in Decision Making Contents:Author info Abstract Bibliographic info Download info Related research References Citations Lists systematic human error reduction and prediction (sherpa) Statistics Corrections Author Info Mohamad, Shahriari Aliandrina, Dessy Feng, Yan Registered author(s): AbstractThe aim of this paper was to identify human errors in decision making process. The study was focused on a research question such as: what could be the human error as a potential of decision failure in evaluation of the alternatives in the process of decision making. Two case studies were selected
Knowledge Based Medical Errors
from the literature and analyzed to find the human errors contribute to decision fail. Then the analysis of human errors was linked with mental models in evaluation of alternative step. The results of the study showed that five human errors occur in the evaluation of alternatives step; ignorance or neglect, overconfidence, underestimate, moral and fail to see, which led to un-achievement of objectives Download Info If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large. File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8171/1/MPRA_paper_8171.pdfFile Function: original versionDownload Restriction: no Bibliographic Info Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 8171. as HTML HTML with abstract plain text plain text with abstract BibTeX RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite) ReDIF JSON in new window Length: Date of creation: 13 Apr 2005 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:8171 Contact details of provider: Postal: Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, GermanyPhone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.deMore information through ED
Please note that Internet Explorer version 8.x will not be supported as of January 1, 2016. Please refer to this blog post for more information. Close ScienceDirectSign inSign in using your ScienceDirect credentialsUsernamePasswordRemember
Rasmussen Srk Model
meForgotten username or password?Sign in via your institutionOpenAthens loginOther institution loginHelpJournalsBooksRegisterJournalsBooksRegisterSign inHelpcloseSign in using types of human error at workplace your ScienceDirect credentialsUsernamePasswordRemember meForgotten username or password?Sign in via your institutionOpenAthens loginOther institution login Purchase Help Direct export 4 types of human error Export file RIS(for EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite) BibTeX Text RefWorks Direct Export Content Citation Only Citation and Abstract Advanced search JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/8171.html all the features on this page. JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page. This page uses JavaScript to progressively load the article content as a user scrolls. Click the View full text link to bypass dynamically loaded article content. View full text Elsevier Ocean Engineering SeriesVolume 7, 2003, Pages 213–242Technology and Safety of Marine SystemsEdited By Anand http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571995203800119 Pillay and Jin Wang Chapter 9 Human error assessment and decision making using analytical hierarchy processingAvailable online 2 September 2007SummaryA brief review of common human error assessment methods is presented highlighting the requirements and steps of each method. This is followed by an introduction to the Analytical Hierarchy Processing (AHP) method to aid decision-making. An approach to integrate human error assessment and decision-making using the AHP method is described. The aim of this approach is to reduce the occurrence probability and severity of human error during the operational phase of a fishing vessel. It utilises AHP theory to rank the impacts of human error and further integrates the available control options (to minimise these errors) within the analysis. The result obtained from the analysis reflects the most favoured control option that will address all the possible human errors within the system to a satisfactory level. A test case, which considers the shooting operation of a beam trawler, is used to demonstrate the described approach. Each step involved in the shooting operation is assessed for its vulnerability to human error with respect to the equipment being operated and this captures the operatormachine interaction.Key WordsAHP; decision making; human error; human error assessmentCopyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rig
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:50:28 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:50:28 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)