Human Error In It
Contents |
on Slideshare Security Intelligence Analysis and Insight for Information Security Professionals Toggle navigation Search for: Search Expand News Topics Industries X-Force Research Media Events & Webinars Home > Topics > CISO > How human error in information technology to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents How to Reduce Human
What Is Human Error In Computers
Error in Information Security Incidents January 13, 2015 | By Nicole van Deursen Share How to Reduce Human Error examples of human error in information technology in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn Share human error cyber security How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn According to the 2014 IBM Chief Information Security Officer Assessment, 95 percent of information security incidents involve human error. Human error is not only the most important factor
Human Error In Information Security
affecting security, but it is also a key factor in aviation accidents and in medical errors. Information security risk managers and chief information security officers can benefit from the insights of studies on the human factor within these industries to reduce human error related to security. What Is Human Error? Human errors are usually defined as circumstances in which planned actions, decisions or behaviors reduce — or have the potential to reduce — quality, safety and security. Examples of human error involved in information security include the following: System misconfiguration; Poor patch management; Use of default usernames and passwords or easy-to-guess passwords; Lost devices; Disclosure of information via an incorrect email address; Double-clicking on an unsafe URL or attachment; Sharing passwords with others; Leaving computers unattended when outside the workplace; Using personally owned mobile devices that connect to the organization's network. Human-factor engineers in aviation assume that serious incidents are not caused by just one human error, but by an unfortunate alignment of several individual events. Incidents happen when a series of minor events occur consecutively and/or concurrently. It is easy to see the parallel with info
the most or really matter) Threat of the month THREAT OF THE MONTH: October 2016 Subscribe Archive SC Magazine Facebook SC Magazine Twitter SC Magazine LinkedIn SC Magazine Google Plus Log in | Register News Latest News News Bytes data breach human error Features Opinions Canada LATEST NEWS Enterprises need a culture of cybersecurity, says PCI Security Standards "human error" cyber attack Council Sierra Wireless issues ICS-ALERT to warn users of Mirai threat Ghost Push possesses Android devices; only version 6.0 is safe NEWS
How To Reduce Human Error In The Workplace
Ascesso malware spreading via student loan forgiveness spam The bad actors behind a new malware contagion are exploiting the desperation of American college graduates looking for relief from their student debt. IN PRINT A new ethics?: Moral https://securityintelligence.com/how-to-reduce-human-error-in-information-security-incidents/ compass Staying ahead of threats: Growing dangers Cybersecurity preparedness requires threat intelligence information sharing Product Reviews Group Tests First Looks Emerging Products Product Index About Reviews Blogs The Threat Hunter Blog The Data Breach Blog SC Congress SC Congress Chicago SC Congress New York SC Congress Toronto SC Extras Videos eBooks Slideshows Case Studies Polls Featured Slideshow May 2015 Global Threats Argentina, the United States and Vietnam were among the top producers of zombie http://www.scmagazine.com/study-find-carelessness-among-top-human-errors-affecting-security/article/406876/ IP addresses following Russia. SC Magazine's mobile app Access our newsletters Submit an article to SCMagazine.com Podcasts Events Online Events SC Awards 2017 White Papers Videos Outside Lens Director's Cut InFocus SC Magazine > News > Human error cited as leading contributor to breaches, study shows Adam Greenberg, Senior Reporter April 01, 2015 Human error cited as leading contributor to breaches, study shows Share this content: facebook twitter linkedin google Comments Print "End user failure to follow policies and procedures" and "general carelessness" were cited as the top examples of human error. Human error accounts for 52 percent of the root cause of security breaches, according to a new study from CompTIA, which surveyed individuals from hundreds of companies in the U.S. Asked about the top examples of human error, 42 percent of those surveyed cited "end user failure to follow policies and procedures," another 42 percent cited "general carelessness," 31 percent named "failure to get up to speed on new threats," 29 percent named "lack of expertise with websites/applications," and 26 percent cited "IT staff failure to follow policies and procedures." Despite 52 percent of respondents naming human error as the leading contributor to security breaches, only 30 percent of respondents in the study cited "human error among general staff" as a serious concern, and only 27 percent cited "
Contact Talk With An Expert Start an RFP Urgent Incident Response Client Support search Clear search 0 Results Found Back To Results Human Error: The Largest Information Security Risk To https://www.secureworks.com/blog/general-human_error_information_security_risk_organization Your Organization Category Information Security July 13, 2012 By SecureWorks Security Awareness Training: A Best Practice for Companies to Reduce Information Security Risks Data security breaches and information security risk http://resilience.willis.com/articles/2013/09/23/human-errors-workplace/ management issues are in the news all the time and CISOs across the globe are working tirelessly to tighten up corporate security. The recent photos of personal debit cards human error on Twitter, however, shine the spotlight once again on an area of corporate security that may be overlooked in many organizations: employees. Individuals work for companies, and many individuals do not seem to understand the risks inherent in using the Internet. In case we're thinking that this kind of carelessness in information security is unusual, or that it wouldn't human error in happen "with the bright professionals we have in our employment," the next few lines may come as a surprise. Kroll Advisory Solutions concluded in its 2012 HIMSS Analytics Report that "human error remains the greatest threat to data security across the healthcare industry," and according to Ponemon Institute's report, The Human Factor in Data Protection, at least 78% of respondents indicated that their company had experienced a data security breach as a result of human negligence or maliciousness. Ponemon also identified 10 risky practices in which employees routinely engage, that are directly related to information security: Connecting computers to the Internet through an insecure wireless network. Not deleting information on their computer when no longer necessary. Sharing passwords with others. Reusing the same password and username on different websites. Using generic USB drives not encrypted or safeguarded by other means. Leaving computers unattended when outside the workplace. Losing a USB drive possibly containing confidential data and not immediately notifying their organization. Working on a laptop when traveling and not using a privacy screen. Carrying unnecessary
influence the C-suite How ERM can help risk managers to support the C-suite Why a firm knowledge of risk tolerance can be the risk manager’s compass Top 3 strategies for navigating the soft insurance market Mars’ risk manager discusses risk management strategies How a risk-based premium allocation methodology improves risk financing Are you ready to manage people risks of the future? Risk management strategy in Formula 1 Why more risk managers are using alternative risk transfer solutions How the Bloodhound Project manages risks at 1,000 miles per hour Deterring unethical employee behaviour How data analytics can help to identify health care solutions How Mars manages its insurance programmes Why risk managers and insurers must keep pace with the changing cyber risk environment How new capital is reshaping the (re)insurance sector Previous Issues Issue 01 / October 2012 Issue 02 / April 2013 Issue 03 / October 2013 Issue 04 / April 2014 Issue 05 / January 2015 Issue 06 / April 2015 Issue 07 / October 2015 Search WillisWire Contact Author Issue 03 / October 2013 Minimising human errors in the workplace At a glance Human error contributes to more than nine out of ten workplace accidents Developing the right internal culture is critical in reducing the risk of accidents Identifying risks and managing feedback plays key role in risk reduction Companies should regularly monitor their employees’ behaviour before incidents turn into serious accidents, cultivate an awareness culture among their workforce, and identify potential sources of error among their supply chain and contractors More than nine out of ten workplace accidents are the result of human error. Disasters as diverse as the explosion of the Deep Water Horizon platform in the Gulf of Mexico, the Copiapó mining accident in Chile and the Spanish train derailment near Santiago de Compostela all stem from mistakes made by people. A lack of incidents can breed complacency and lead workers to take bigger risks and break even more rules." There is no easy way of mitigating human error, because it can induced not only by there being too few rules, but also by there being too many. Create the right culture Instead, companies should try to create a culture of openness around the reporting of incidents, and identify in advance certain divisions or groups of employees where errors are more likely to occur. Even then companies can still be seriously affected by people making mistakes, brought about by a change in personnel, regulation that affects workplace protocols, or even by an error occurring within the supply chain or among contractors. “Th