Human Error It
Contents |
on Slideshare Security Intelligence Analysis and Insight for Information Security Professionals Toggle navigation Search for: Search Expand News Topics Industries X-Force Research Media Events & how to reduce human error in the workplace Webinars Home > Topics > CISO > The Role of Human human error in information technology Error in Successful Security Attacks The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks September 2, 2014 what is human error in computers | By Fran Howarth Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on Twitter Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on Facebook human error in information security Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on LinkedIn Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on Twitter Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on Facebook Share The Role of Human Error in Successful Security Attacks on LinkedIn All humans make mistakes. One of the
Human Error Cyber Security
most intriguing findings from IBM's "2014 Cyber Security Intelligence Index" is that 95 percent of all security incidents involve human error. Many of these are successful security attacks from external attackers who prey on human weakness in order to lure insiders within organizations to unwittingly provide them with access to sensitive information. These mistakes are costly since they involve insiders who often have access to the most sensitive information. According to research by Federal Computer Week cited in a recent Vormetric report, the greatest impacts of successful security attacks involving insiders are exposure of sensitive data, theft of intellectual property and the introduction of malware. The research also reported that 59 percent of respondents agree that most information technology security threats that directly result from insiders are the result of innocent mistakes rather than malicious abuse of privileges. The Threats of Inadvertent Human Error by Insider Mistakes One of the leading errors made by insiders is sending sensitive documents to unintended recipients. This is relat
the field of human reliability assessment (HRA), for the purposes of evaluating the probability of a human error occurring throughout the
A Technical Examination Which Eliminates Possible Human Errors
completion of a specific task. From such analyses measures can examples of human error in information technology then be taken to reduce the likelihood of errors occurring within a system and therefore lead a technical examination which eliminates human errors hcl to an improvement in the overall levels of safety. There exist three primary reasons for conducting an HRA; error identification, error quantification and error reduction. As https://securityintelligence.com/the-role-of-human-error-in-successful-security-attacks/ there exist a number of techniques used for such purposes, they can be split into one of two classifications; first generation techniques and second generation techniques. First generation techniques work on the basis of the simple dichotomy of ‘fits/doesn’t fit’ in the matching of the error situation in context with related error identification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_error_assessment_and_reduction_technique and quantification and second generation techniques are more theory based in their assessment and quantification of errors. ‘HRA techniques have been utilised in a range of industries including healthcare, engineering, nuclear, transportation and business sector; each technique has varying uses within different disciplines. HEART method is based upon the principle that every time a task is performed there is a possibility of failure and that the probability of this is affected by one or more Error Producing Conditions (EPCs) – for instance: distraction, tiredness, cramped conditions etc. – to varying degrees. Factors which have a significant effect on performance are of greatest interest. These conditions can then be applied to a “best-case-scenario” estimate of the failure probability under ideal conditions to then obtain a final error chance. This figure assists in communication of error chances with the wider risk analysis or safety case. By forcing consideration of the EPCs potentially affecting a given procedure, HEART also
NOPSEMA Compliance strategy Annual report and budget Agency contracts for financial years Agency contracts for calendar years Independent reviews https://www.nopsema.gov.au/resources/human-factors/human-error/ 2015 Operational Review of NOPSEMA 2015 EPBC Act Streamlining Review 2011 http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Human_Error_Types Operational Review of NOPSA NOPSEMA Board Cost recovery and levies International collaboration Careers with NOPSEMA Find a job opportunity How to apply Conditions of employment Workplace diversity Safety Operator Nomination & Registration Operator nomination Operator replacement / de-registration Safety Case Safety case approach What human error is a safety case Validation Safety Case Guidance Notes Inspections Health and Safety Representatives Accredited HSR training courses & providers Reporting Accidents and Dangerous Occurrences Enforcement Diving Operations Management of Occupational Health Offshore Petroleum Safety Tripartite Forum Petroleum Safety Zones Gazetted Notices Authorisations to enter the ATBA Safety Alerts National Safety Alerts International Safety human error in Alerts Granting Exemptions Regulatory Levies Safety Resources Policies Guidance Information Papers Forms Technical reports Well Integrity Notification and Reporting Well Integrity Resources Environment Activity status and summaries Assessment process Environment plans Offshore project proposals Financial assurance Consultation process Oil pollution risks Inspections Enforcement Notification and reporting Environment alerts Stakeholder engagement and transparency Resources Legislation & Regulations Health and Safety Well Integrity Environment Resources Newsletters - the Regulator Previous issues of the Regulator Frequently asked questions Presentations Data reports and statistics Major offshore incidents Published Notices Human Factors Human Error Human Reliability Analysis Safety Culture Human Factors Information Papers Freedom of Information Information publication scheme FOI disclosure log News & Media Contact Making a submission to NOPSEMA Feedback to NOPSEMA Resources » Human Factors » Human Error Human Error Human Error is commonly defined as “a failure of a planned action to achieve a desired outcome”. Error-inducing factors exist at individual, job, and organisational levels, and when poorly managed can increase the likeli
navigation, searchHERE Article Information Category: Human Behaviour Content source: SKYbrary Content control: SKYbrary Contents 1 Definition 2 Description 3 Slips and Lapses 3.1 Examples of slips and lapses in aviation 4 Mistakes 4.1 Example of mistake 5 Error frequencies 6 Error detection and correction 7 Related Articles 8 Further Reading Definition Errors are the result of actions that fail to generate the intended outcomes. They are categorized according to the cognitive processes involved towards the goal of the action and according to whether they are related to planning or execution of the activity. Description Actions by human operators can fail to achieve their goal in two different ways: The actions can go as planned, but the plan can be inadequate, or the plan can be satisfactory, but the performance can still be deficient (Hollnagel, 1993). Errors can be broadly distinguished in two categories: Category 1 - A person intends to carry out an action, the action is appropriate, carries it out incorrectly, and the desired goal is not achieved. - An execution failure has occurred. Execution errors are called Slips and Lapses. They result from failures in the execution and/or storage stage of an action sequence. Slips relate to observable actions and are commonly associated with attentional or perceptual failures. Lapses are more internal events and generally involve failures of memory. Category 2 - A person intends to carry out an action, does so correctly, the action is inappropriate, and the desired goal is not achieved - A planning failure has occurred. Planning failures are Mistakes. “Mistakes may be defined as deficiencies or failures in the judgmental and/or inferential processes involved in the selection of an objective or in the specification of the means to achieve it.” (Reason, 1990). Execution errors correspond to the Skill based level of Rasmussen’s levels of performance (Rasmussen 1986), while planning errors