Human Error Mechanisms In Complex Work Environments
institution loginHelpJournalsBooksRegisterJournalsBooksRegisterSign inHelpcloseSign in using your ScienceDirect credentialsUsernamePasswordRemember meForgotten username or password?Sign in via your institutionOpenAthens loginOther institution login Purchase Loading... Export You have selected 1 citation for export. Help Direct export Save to Mendeley Save to RefWorks Export file Format RIS (for EndNote, ReferenceManager, ProCite) BibTeX Text Content Citation Only Citation and Abstract Export Advanced search Close This document does not have an outline. JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page. Reliability Engineering & System Safety Volume 22, Issues 1–4, 1988, Pages 155-167 Human error mechanisms in complex work environments Author links open the overlay panel. Numbers correspond to the affiliation list which can be exposed by using the show more link. Opens overlay Jens Rasmusse ∗ aDepartment of Cognitive Engineering, The Technical University of Copenhagen, Denmark Available online 3 March 2003 Show more Choose an option to locate/access this article: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution. Check access Purchase Sign in using your ScienceDirect credentials Username: Password: Remember me Not Registered? Forgotten username or password? OpenAthens login Login via your institution Other institution login doi:10.1016/0951-8320(88)90072-5 Get rights and content AbstractHuman error taxonomies have been developed from analysis of industrial incident reports as well as from psychological experiments. In this paper the results of the two approaches are reviewed and compared. It is found, in both cases, that a fairly small number of basic psychological mechanisms will account for most of the action errors observed. In addition, error mechanisms appear to be intimately related to the development of high skill and know-how in a complex work context. This relationship between errors a
Request full-text Human error mechanisms in complex work environmentsArticle in Reliability Engineering [?] System Safety 22(1-4):155-167 · January 1988 with 10 ReadsDOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(88)90072-5 1st Jens RasmusseAbstractHuman error taxonomies have been developed from analysis of industrial incident reports as well as from psychological experiments. In this paper the results of the two approaches are reviewed and compared. It is found, in both cases, that a fairly small number of basic psychological mechanisms will account for most of the action errors observed. In addition, error mechanisms appear to be intimately related to the development of high skill and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0951832088900725 know-how in a complex work context. This relationship between errors and human adaptation is discussed in detail for individuals and organisations. The implications for system safety are briefly mentioned, together with the implications for system design.Do you want to read the rest of this article?Request full-text CitationsCitations22ReferencesReferences26A review of medical error taxonomies: A human factors perspective"For example, communication, medication procedures, and working https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245078481_Human_error_mechanisms_in_complex_work_environments environment were identified as systemic factors for medication errors (Carayon, 2007) while low morale was identified as a systemic factor for violations in medication administration (Fogarty and McKeon, 2006). According to Rasmussen, the study of error must include the 'structure of the task and the environment' (Rasmussen, 1988). An approach that examines such systemic factors will prevent adverse events (Catchpole et al., 2006). "[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Although a large number of medical error taxonomies have been published, there is little evidence to suggest that these taxonomies have been systematically compared. This paper describes a study comparing 26 medical error taxonomies using a human factors perspective. The taxonomies were examined to determine if they classified systemic factors of medical errors and if they utilized theoretical error concepts in their classifications. Scope of classification was also examined. It was found that two-thirds of the taxonomies classified systemic factors of medical errors and only a third utilized theoretical error concepts. Medical error taxonomies based on theoretical error concepts were more likely to be generic in applicability and also more likely to classify systemic factors a
von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderBooksbooks.google.de - Fresh research has opened up new vistas in forensic pathology that are allowing for closer national and international cooperation between pathologists and scientists https://books.google.com/books?id=-3ZOT2M8pLQC&pg=PA177&lpg=PA177&dq=human+error+mechanisms+in+complex+work+environments&source=bl&ots=UJ6fdshZXO&sig=bRpN8KwllAxkK0KS_7fO_Npk8T8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjbk7764N3PAhXI44MKH in a range of medical and scientific disciplines. At the same time, autopsy and laboratory techniques are undergoing rapid evolution, with...https://books.google.de/books/about/Forensic_Pathology_Reviews.html?hl=de&id=-3ZOT2M8pLQC&utm_source=gb-gplus-shareForensic Pathology ReviewsMeine BücherHilfeErweiterte BuchsucheE-Book kaufen - 182,43 €Nach Druckexemplar suchenSpringer ShopAmazon.deBuch.deBuchkatalog.deLibri.deWeltbild.deIn Bücherei suchenAlle Händler»Forensic Pathology Reviews, Band 6Elisabeth E. TurkSpringer Science & Business Media, 12.08.2011 - 344 Seiten 0 Rezensionenhttps://books.google.de/books/about/Forensic_Pathology_Reviews.html?hl=de&id=-3ZOT2M8pLQCFresh human error research has opened up new vistas in forensic pathology that are allowing for closer national and international cooperation between pathologists and scientists in a range of medical and scientific disciplines. At the same time, autopsy and laboratory techniques are undergoing rapid evolution, with new procedures coming on stream while existing processes human error mechanisms yield additional—and more accurate—results. This sixth volume of reviews in forensic pathology provides professionals working in the field with cutting-edge material on the latest key advances in the fields of traumatic death, sudden natural death and death time estimation. Now with numerous color illustrations, the book gives forensic experts across the world a fully up-to-date guide to contemporary procedures and theory in forensic science and medicine. The chapters cover an exhaustive range of aspects in the discipline, from the analysis of sudden natural deaths in infancy and childhood to the cardiac proteomics approach in the study of cases involving sudden cardiac death. Other specialist chapters deal with the forensic investigation of deaths in aviation and as a result of accidents involving all-terrain vehicles. The volume covers fresh research in the use of protein markers for the estimation of post-mortem intervals, and features a chapter telling the story of the medico-legal investigation
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:16:17 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)