Human Error Onboard Ship
Contents |
International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America Opinion Editorials Columns Perspectives Editorial Cartoons More Opinion Research and Reports Directories White Papers People Comings & Goings Up Close Executive Q&A's Awards and Events Risk Management Human error remains the most important factor in marine accidents Reprints By Sarah ship accidents due to human error Veysey 9/8/2013 12:00:00 AM Share While huge strides continue to be made in improving marine ship accidents caused by human error safety, human error remains the most important factor in marine accidents.And competitive pressures coupled with the increasing size of vessels mean that training marine accidents caused by human error and quality of crew are becoming ever more important, experts say.Marine safety is an issue that is always near the top of the agenda for the International Union of Marine Insurance, according to its secretary general, Lars effects of human error in maritime industry Lange.He said that marine insurers are “key stakeholders” in the effort to improve marine safety.IUMI works closely with organizations including the London-based International Maritime Organization, a United Nations body.Most casualties are the result either of equipment failure or human error or a combination of the two, with human error the dominant factor, said Gordon Street, claims manager at Marsh Ltd. in London.A report last year by Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, a unit of Munich-based
Human Errors In Shipping
Allianz S.E., showed that while shipping safety has improved greatly over the past 100 years — since the sinking of the Titanic — and the size of the world's commercial shipping fleet has trebled in that time, there still are key challenges to marine safety. The main challenge, according to the report, is human error, which accounts for more than 75% of marine losses.“The reason behind any given casualty is usually complex and hard to attribute to a single cause — inevitably it is a mixture of a number of things,” said Terje Paulsen, vice president for loss prevention and risk assessment at Arendal, Norway-based Gard AS.While hard data on the causes of marine accidents is difficult to find, “our experience would suggest that human error is a significant part of 70% to 80% of all accidents,” he said.%%BREAK%%While accidents are mostly due to mistakes, they rarely are caused by a single person and should be viewed “in the context of the whole organization — both onboard and ashore.”While the immediate cause of an accident may be the result of the actions of an individual, these frequently “are the result of factors in the local work environment which are a consequence of organizational factors,” he said.Economic pressures may mean that some ship owners may have reduced their training budgets, said Rahul Khanna, a se
Consultancy accreditation Membership Membership benefits Associate Member Fellow Graduate Member Registered Member Student Member Technical Member Chartership Code of conduct European Ergonomist Volunteering Events Regional Groups Special Interest Groups Jobs Advertising Careers Member stories Shop About
Marine Accidents Case Study
Vision & Mission Support us Awards Governance AGM Affiliations A brief history CIEHF causes of maritime accidents Documents Contact myIEHF Learn What is Ergonomics? Case studies Sectors Defence Energy Healthcare Manufacturing Office Ergonomics Transport CPD Degree Courses causes of ship accidents Training Courses The Ergonomist Latest Research In the News Standards Blog Find expertise Consultants Directory Consultancy accreditation Membership Membership Benefits Associate Member Fellow Graduate Member Registered Member Student Member Technical Member Chartership Code of http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20130908/NEWS07/309089991 Conduct European Ergonomist Volunteering Events Regional Groups Special Interest Groups Jobs Advertising Careers Member Stories Shop About Vision & Mission Support us Awards Governance AGM Affiliations A Brief History CIEHF Documents Contact Safety at sea: human factors aboard ship Safety at sea: human factors aboard ship 11 June 2015 Safety at sea: human factors aboard ship Changes in shipping practices that mean human factors input is becoming increasingly http://www.ergonomics.org.uk/safety-at-sea-human-factors-aboard-ship/ important for improving safety and efficiency on board ships, but as Catherine Harvey and colleagues discuss, working with an industry so steeped in tradition can be a challenge. Ships transport 23 million tonnes of cargo and 55,000 cruise passengers every day. Transport must continuously evolve to meet the needs of a growing world population and the maritime industry attempts to meet this demand with trends towards larger ships, design standardisation, specialisation of vessel types and increasing automation. Safety management is still a major challenge with recent worrying reports of an increase in the frequency of shipping accidents. In 2012, the Department for Transport reported that there were over 24,000 UK nationals working as seafarers and 64% of these were involved in ship or engine handling. Despite the obvious importance of the human element in shipping, human factors is reportedly lacking in all aspects of the maritime domain, from the design of vessels, occupational factors and the training and supply of suitable crew members, through to organisational management. An insufficiency of human factors research is an issue in many areas however, there seems to be a sense throughout the literature that the problem is particularly severe in the maritime sector, likely d
ChapterHuman Reliability and Error in Transportation Systems Part of the series Springer Series in Reliability Engineering pp 91-103Human Error in Shipping Buy http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-84628-812-8_7.pdf this eBook * Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT. Get Access Page %P Close Plain text Look Inside Chapter Metrics Provided by Bookmetrix Reference tools Export citation EndNote (.ENW) JabRef (.BIB) Mendeley (.BIB) Papers (.RIS) Zotero (.RIS) BibTeX (.BIB) Add to Papers Other actions About this Book Reprints and Permissions Share Share this content on Facebook Share human error this content on Twitter Share this content on LinkedIn Supplementary Material (0) References (37) References1.Gardiner, R., Editor, The Shipping Revolution: The Modern Merchant Ship, Conway Maritime Press, London, U.K., 1992.2.Bone, K., Editor, The New York Waterfront: Evolution and Building Culture of the Port and Harbour, Monacelli Press, New York, 1997.3.Fotland, H., Human Error: A Fragile Chain of Contributing Elements, The International accidents caused by Maritime Human Element Bulletin, No. 3, April 2004, pp. 2–3. Published by the Nautical Institute, 202 Lambeth Road, London, U.K.4. Just Waiting to Happen... The Work of the UK P & I Club, The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin, No. 1, October 2003, pp. 3–4. Published by the Nautical Institute, 202 Lambeth Road, London, U.K.5.DVD Spotlights Human Error in Shipping Accidents, Asia Maritime Digest, January/ February 2004, pp. 41–42.6.Boniface, D.E., Bea, R.G., Assessing the Risks of and Countermeasures for Human and Organizational Error, SNAME Transactions, Vol. 104, 1996, pp. 157–177.7.Rothblum, A.M., Human Error and Marine Safety, Proceedings of the Maritime Human Factors Conference, Maryland, USA, 2000, pp. 1–10.8. Working Paper on Tankers Involved in Shipping Accidents 1975–1992, Transportation Safety Board of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1994.9.Cormier, P.J., Towing Vessel Safety: Analysis of Congressional and Cost Guard Investigative Response to Operator Involvement in Causalities Where a Presumption of Negligence Exists, Masters Thesis, University of Rhode Island, USA, 1994.10.Hee, D.D., Pickrell, B.D., Bea, R.G., Roberts, K.H., Williamson, R.B., Safety Management Assessment System (SMAS): A Process for Identifying and Evaluating Human and Organization Fac
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:45:23 GMT by s_wx1131 (squid/3.5.20)