Human Error Probability Database
Contents |
the purposes of evaluating the probability of a human error occurring throughout the completion of a specific task. From such analyses measures can then be taken to reduce the likelihood of errors occurring within a system and therefore lead average human error rate to an improvement in the overall levels of safety. There exist three primary reasons for human error rate in data entry conducting an HRA; error identification, error quantification and error reduction. As there exist a number of techniques used for such purposes, they technique for human error rate prediction can be split into one of two classifications; first generation techniques and second generation techniques. First generation techniques work on the basis of the simple dichotomy of ‘fits/doesn’t fit’ in the matching of the error situation how to calculate human error percent in context with related error identification and quantification and second generation techniques are more theory based in their assessment and quantification of errors. ‘HRA techniques have been utilised in a range of industries including healthcare, engineering, nuclear, transportation and business sector; each technique has varying uses within different disciplines. THERP models human error probabilities (HEPs) using a fault-tree approach, in a similar way to an engineering risk assessment, but also accounts for
Error Tolerant Systems
performance shaping factors (PSFs) that may influence these probabilities. The probabilities for the human reliability analysis event tree (HRAET), which is the primary tool for assessment, are nominally calculated from the database developed by the authors Swain and Guttman; local data e.g. from simulators or accident reports may however be used instead. The resultant tree portrays a step by step account of the stages involved in a task, in a logical order. The technique is known as a total methodology [1] as it simultaneously manages a number of different activities including task analysis, error identification, representation in form of HRAET and HEP quantification. Contents 1 Background 2 THERP methodology 3 Worked example 3.1 Context 3.2 Assumptions 3.3 Method 3.4 Results 4 Advantages of THERP 5 Disadvantages of THERP 6 References Background[edit] The technique for human error rate prediction (THERP) is a first generation methodology, which means that its procedures follow the way conventional reliability analysis models a machine. [7] The technique was developed in the Sandia Laboratories for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission [2]. Its primary author is Swain, who developed the THERP methodology gradually over a lengthy period of time. [1]. THERP relies on a large human reliability database that contains HEPs, and is based upon both plant data and expert judgments. The technique wa
Industry human error probability calculation Education Engineering & Technology Environment & Agriculture Environment and human error calculation Sustainability Food Science & Technology Geography Health and Social Care Humanities Information Science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technique_for_human_error-rate_prediction Language & Literature Law Mathematics & Statistics Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health Museum and Heritage Studies Physical Sciences Politics & International Relations Social Sciences Sports and http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09617353.1993.11690625 Leisure Tourism, Hospitality and Events Urban Studies Information for Authors Editors Librarians Societies Open access Overview Open journals Open Select Cogent OA Help and info Help FAQs Press releases Contact us Commercial services Connect with Taylor & Francis © Informa Group plc Privacy policy & cookies Terms & conditions Accessibility Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG Accept This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:54:09 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:54:09 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)