Human Error Probability Table
Contents |
Wellness Worldwide Plant Wellness Way Explained Operational Excellence Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Business Process Improvement ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Manufacturing average human error rate Training See Online Training Courses Public and In-House Courses Best Enterprise
Human Error Rate In Data Entry
Asset Management Master Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning- Scheduling Improve Equipment Reliability Precision Maintenance Up-Skilling Introduce Lean Improvements
Human Error Rate Prediction
Workforce Engineering Training Free Articles Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maintenance Engineering Solutions Reliability Improvement Work Quality Assurance Precision Maintenance Lean Management Methods Team Building
How To Calculate Human Error Percent
Tutorials Plant and Equipment Wellness Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Reliability Engineering Business Process Improvement Maintenance Planning- Scheduling ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Management Methods Free PWW Tutorial Videos FAQs Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning- Scheduling Maintenance Engineering Solutions Reliability Improvement Work Quality Assurance Precision Maintenance Lean Management Methods Team Building Online Store Maint Planning Online acceptable error rate six sigma Training Maint Management Online Training Enterprise Asset Management PPT Maintenance Management PPT Reliability Engineering PPT Lean and Quality Management PPT Machinery Maintenance PPT Contact Us Lifetime-Reliability Solutions Navigation Home About Us LRS Mission and Values LRS Services and Consulting LRS Consultants Bios LRS Business JVs LRS Profit Share Jobs LRS Insight Newsletters LRS Conference PPTs Plant Wellness Videos Consulting LRS Services and Consulting Plant Wellness Worldwide Plant Wellness Way Explained Operational Excellence Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Business Process Improvement ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Manufacturing Training See Online Training Courses Public and In-House Courses Best Enterprise Asset Management Master Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning- Scheduling Improve Equipment Reliability Precision Maintenance Up-Skilling Introduce Lean Improvements Workforce Engineering Training Free Articles Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maintenance Engineering Solutions Reliability Improvement Work Quality Assurance Precision Maintenance Lean Management Methods Team Building Tutorials Plant and Equipment Wellness Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Reliability Engineering Business Process Improvement Maintenance Planning- Scheduling ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Management Methods Free PWW Tutori
across studies. However only fairly simple actions are used in the denominator. The Klemmer and Snyder study shows that much lower typical data entry error rates error rates are possible--in this case for people whose job consisted almost human error probability data entirely of data entry. The error rate for more complex logic errors is about 5%, based primarily on human error statistics in aviation data on other pages, especially the program development page. Study Detail Error Rate Baddeley & Longman [1973] Entering mail codes. Errors after correction. Per mail code. 0.5% Chedru http://www.lifetime-reliability.com/cms/tutorials/reliability-engineering/human_error_rate_table_insights/ & Geschwind [1972] Grammatical errors per word 1.1% Dhillon [1986] Reading a gauge incorrectly. Per read. 0.5% Dremen and Berry [1995] Percentage error in security analysts' earnings forecasts for reporting earnings. 1980 / 1985 / 1990. That is, size of error rather than frequency of error. 30% 52% 65% Edmondson [1996] Errors per medication in hospital, based on data presented in http://panko.shidler.hawaii.edu/HumanErr/Basic.htm the paper. Per dose. 1.6% Grudin [1983] Error rate per keystroke for six expert typists. Told not to correct errors, although some did. Per keystroke. 1% Hotopf [1980] S sample (speech errors). Per word 0.2% Hotopf [1980] W sample (written exam). Per word 0.9% Hotopf [1980] 10 undergraduates write for 30 minutes, grammatical and spelling errors per word 1.6% Klemmer [1962] Keypunch machine operators, errors per character 0.02% to 0.06% Klemmer [1962] Bank machine operators, errors per check 0.03% Kukich [1992] Nonword spelling errors in uses of telecommunication devices for the deaf. 40,000 words (strings). Per string. 6% Mathias, MacKenzie & Buxton [1996] 10 touch typists averaging 58 words per minute. No error correction. In last session. Per keystroke. 4% Mattson & Baars [1992] Typing study with secretaries and clerks. Nonsense words. Per nonsense word. 7.4% Melchers & Harrington [1982] Students performing calculator tasks and table lookup tasks. Per multipart calculation. Per table lookup. Etc. 1%-2% Mitton [1987] Study of 170,016 errors in high-school essays, spelling errors. Per word. 2.4% Potter [1995] Errors in making entries in an aircraft f
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:40:44 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:40:44 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)