Human Error Psychology
Contents |
& Bioassays Resources...DNA & RNABLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)E-UtilitiesGenBankGenBank: BankItGenBank: human error slips lapses mistakes SequinGenBank: tbl2asnGenome WorkbenchInfluenza VirusNucleotide DatabasePopSetPrimer-BLASTProSplignReference Sequence (RefSeq)RefSeqGeneSequence
Knowledge Based Errors
Read Archive (SRA)SplignTrace ArchiveUniGeneAll DNA & RNA Resources...Data & SoftwareBLAST (Basic knowledge based medical errors Local Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)Cn3DConserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)E-UtilitiesGenBank: BankItGenBank: SequinGenBank: tbl2asnGenome ProtMapGenome WorkbenchPrimer-BLASTProSplignPubChem Structure SearchSNP Submission mode error ToolSplignVector Alignment Search Tool (VAST)All Data & Software Resources...Domains & StructuresBioSystemsCn3DConserved Domain Database (CDD)Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)Structure (Molecular Modeling Database)Vector Alignment Search Tool (VAST)All Domains & Structures Resources...Genes & ExpressionBioSystemsDatabase of Genotypes and Phenotypes
Ihi Global Trigger Tool Definition Of Harm
(dbGaP)E-UtilitiesGeneGene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Database Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) DatasetsGene Expression Omnibus (GEO) ProfilesGenome WorkbenchHomoloGeneMap ViewerOnline Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)RefSeqGeneUniGeneAll Genes & Expression Resources...Genetics & MedicineBookshelfDatabase of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP)Genetic Testing RegistryInfluenza VirusMap ViewerOnline Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)PubMedPubMed Central (PMC)PubMed Clinical QueriesRefSeqGeneAll Genetics & Medicine Resources...Genomes & MapsDatabase of Genomic Structural Variation (dbVar)GenBank: tbl2asnGenomeGenome ProjectGenome ProtMapGenome WorkbenchInfluenza VirusMap ViewerNucleotide DatabasePopSetProSplignSequence Read Archive (SRA)SplignTrace ArchiveAll Genomes & Maps Resources...HomologyBLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)BLAST (Stand-alone)BLAST Link (BLink)Conserved Domain Database (CDD)Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search)Genome ProtMapHomoloGeneProtein ClustersAll Homology Resources...LiteratureBookshelfE-UtilitiesJournals in NCBI DatabasesMeSH DatabaseNCBI HandbookNCBI Help ManualNCBI NewsPubMedPubMed Central (PMC)PubMed Clinical QueriesPubMed HealthAll Literature Resources...ProteinsBioSystemsBLAST
removed. (February 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) A latent human error is a human rule based errors in medicine error which is likely to be made due to systems or four types of human error routines that are formed in such a way that humans are disposed to making these errors. Latent
Difference Between Slip And Mistake
human error is a term used in safety work and accident prevention, especially in aviation. By gathering data about errors made, then collating, grouping and analyzing them, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10225162 it can be determined whether a disproportionate amount of similar errors are being made. If this is the case, a contributing factor may be disharmony between the respective systems/routines and human nature or propensities. The routines or systems can then be analyzed, potential problems identified, and amendments made if necessary, in order to prevent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_human_error future errors, incidents or accidents. See also[edit] Air safety Error Further reading[edit] James Reason: Human Error, Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (October 26, 1990) ISBN 978-0-521-31419-0 External links[edit] Erik Hollnagel, "The Elusiveness of "Human Error"", 2005 Human error: models and management – James Reason British Medical Journal 2000;320:768–70 (Internet Archive) Human factors view of accident causation This psychology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latent_human_error&oldid=738684495" Categories: EngineeringErrorAccidentsBehavioral and social facets of systemic riskPsychology stubsHidden categories: Articles lacking sources from February 2008All articles lacking sourcesAll stub articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages العربية Edit links This page was last modified on 10
fix them. The talk was delivered at Bristol University but is remarkably direct and he pulls no punches in pointing out psychology's scientific flaws. Interestingly, Yong makes the point https://mindhacks.com/2012/10/13/human-error-in-psychology-research-a-rough-guide/ that this is not a problem of psychology specifically, because many of the problems - like publication bias and selective reporting - appear across the scientific board, but that psychology is a hot topic because the field is trying to do something about it. Yong has been doing some fantastic work not only highlighting these difficulties but getting a public debate going about solutions to these problems human error of research culture. His talk is an excellent round-up of his own work and the state of play in the fight to change science culture. Link to post with audio of Ed Yong's talk. Share this:RedditTwitter Related Author vaughanbellPosted on October 13, 2012Categories News, Theory 2 thoughts on “Human error in psychology research: a roughguide” OREALLYNOW says: October 13, 2012 at 2:48 pm Of course, the real human error psychology issue here is that Psychology is not actually a "science" at all. At best it is a sort of primitive form of Philosophy (or perhaps theology); at worse it is a sort of politicized, quasi-religious myth-making masquerading as actual, empirical Science- a conflation which has been the root of much woe in the modern world. In either case, it is a glaring example of both Scientism and pseudo-science. It is absurd to imagine that the sort of things issues it deals with can be handled by science at all. To imagine otherwise is to not understand what actual science is about. The fundamental human aspects and values it wishes to describe and "measure" ere not physical at all-they are fundamentally mental, moral and spiritual. They are best approached though philosophy (ethics and metaphysics), religion and, grasped tangentially and obscurely, the arts. It is one thing to accurately predict the boiling point of water; it is quite another thing to put form certain beliefs, actions or world views as nominative absolutes. Science is valuable precisely because it limits its metaphysical aims. It does not attmpt to describe the meaning of water boiling in the human realm. Psychologists are not possessed o