Intervention Strategies For The Management Of Human Error
Contents |
ENVIS iDRM Home » Key Concepts » iDRM Training Modules » 7 - Human Factors vs Accident Causation » Strategies for reducing
A Technical Examination Which Eliminates Possible Human Errors
human error · Strategies for reducing human error Reducing human error how to reduce human error in the workplace involves far more than taking disciplinary action against an individual. There are a range of measures
A Technical Examination Which Eliminates Human Errors Hcl
which are more effective controls including the design of the equipment, job, procedures and training. The design guidance developed consists of two forms: design principles and a three how to reduce human error in manufacturing step process for systematically addressing human errors in design. The relationships between the guidance developed, human error occurrence and consequence in system operation, and conventional engineering design and design change processes are shown in Figure below. The three-step process helps in the following:- Make goals and system state visible, interfaces should make accessible, information in a ways to prevent human error form so that system state can be easily related to system operational goals. Provide a good conceptual model It is important that operators must be able to develop a good conceptual model of the plant systems from training, from the design of the interface between the operator and the plant, and from observations of system operation. The information from these three sources should be consistent and complementary to reduce the possibility of operating errors. Make the acceptable regions of operation visible directly indicating the acceptable, unacceptable, and desired regions of system operation in process and state displays can act as a visual aid. This reduces dependence on user memory recall and the need for dynamic context dependent determinations. The adequacy of plant process state can thus be judged more readily against performance targets. Make process and automation behaviour predictable. Errors have a better chance of being detected if the normal behavior of plant processes and automation is predictable. Employ affordances. Apply design features that vis
ChapterEngineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Volume 9174 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp 428-435 Date: 21 July 2015The Analysis of Human Error Prevention
Doer Checker Process
Strategies in Military AviationShu-Chiang LinAffiliated withDepartment of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science how to reduce human error in experiments and Technology Email author , Jeng-Chung ChenAffiliated withDepartment of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Wen-Chin LiAffiliated withDepartment of Air
Human Error Reduction Tools
Transport, Cranfield University Buy this eBook * Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT. Get Access Abstract The study applied Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX) framework and Analytic Hierarchy Process http://www.hrdp-idrm.in/e5783/e17327/e28013/e28930/ (AHP) to analyze human errors intervention strategy. Our questionnaire, designed based on 15 significant accidents of Republic of China Air Force (ROCAF), was distributed to ROCAF related personnel and was completed by eight commanders of flight unit and 14 subordinators consisted of ten pilots and four maintenance staffs. Questionnaire results specified that each approach in HFIX framework possesses its unique characteristics. This study has demonstrated http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-20373-7_41 that the HFIX framework can serve as a tool to develop human errors intervention strategies in military aviation, and AHP can be applied to assist decision makers to evaluate these diversified strategies. The study suggests that each flight unit of air force selects appropriate intervention strategies in accordance with its own demands and resource limitations. Keywords Accident prevention Human errors Human factors intervention matrix Military aviation Page %P Close Plain text Look Inside Chapter Metrics Provided by Bookmetrix Reference tools Export citation EndNote (.ENW) JabRef (.BIB) Mendeley (.BIB) Papers (.RIS) Zotero (.RIS) BibTeX (.BIB) Add to Papers Other actions About this Book Reprints and Permissions Share Share this content on Facebook Share this content on Twitter Share this content on LinkedIn Supplementary Material (0) References (14) References1.Flouris, T., Yilmaz, A.K.: Change management as a road map for safety management system implementation in aviation operations: focusing on risk management and operational effectiveness. Int J Civ Aviat. 1, 1–19 (2009)2.Panagopoulos, I., Bond, S.J.: Improving flight safety in combat training: a step forward. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Quality and Reliability, pp. 6-10, IEEE press (2011)3.Federal aviation administration: Aviation Maintenance Handbook-General-addendum/ Human Factor. Washington, D.
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 03:34:56 GMT by s_wx1206 (squid/3.5.20)