Minimize Human Error
Contents |
Mobile Technology?NEW! Data Center Facility Staff Salary Survey: 2015NEW! Data Center Facility Staff how to prevent human error in workplace Salary Survey 2015: More Than 10 MW Login /
How To Reduce Human Error In Experiments
Sign Up KEY FM POSTS FOR YOU NEW! Tablets Lag Behind Laptops for Maintenance how to reduce human error in manufacturing TechniciansNEW! Survey: Funding Ranks as Toughest Roadblock to Adopting Mobile TechnologyNEW! What Does Future Hold for Mobile Technology?NEW! Data Center Facility Staff Salary
Ways To Prevent Human Error
Survey: 2015NEW! Data Center Facility Staff Salary Survey 2015: More Than 10 MW Insights/Updates Topic Research Glossary Special Reports Facility Type Data Centers Education Health Care Government Commercial Office Topic Research Glossary Management Topics ADA Design & Construction Emergency Preparedness Energy Efficiency Facilities Management Green Grounds Management human error reduction tools IAQ Maintenance & Operations Material Handling Outsourcing Technology Topics Building Automation Ceilings, Furniture & Walls Doors & Hardware Elevators Equipment Rental & Tools Fire Safety Flooring HVAC Lighting Paints & Coatings Plumbing & Restrooms Power & Communication Roofing Security Software Windows & Exterior Walls Trending Trending: ADA Compliance When Doing Interior Retrofits, Complying With ADA Is Critical ADA Compliance: Avoiding Common Problems Common ADA Violations ADA Standards Differ From Building Codes Trending: Retrofits Healthcare Facilities Enjoy Bottom-Line Benefits K-12 Districts Tackle Funding Challenges Jobs/Salary BROWSE Job Listings & Salary Information Salary Search Post A Job Salary BenchmarksAdvanced Search Asset Manager Assistant Director, Physical Plant Assistant Property Manager Building or Facility Engineer Building or Facility Manager Building Owner Buildings & Grounds Superintendent Chief Engineer Construction Manager Director, Physical Plant Developer Energy Manager Environmental Services Manager Facilities Coordinator / Superviso
on Slideshare Security Intelligence Analysis and Insight for Information Security Professionals Toggle navigation Search for: Search Expand News Topics Industries X-Force Research Media Events &
Human Error Prevention Ppt
Webinars Home > Topics > CISO > How to Reduce Human
How To Eliminate Human Error
Error in Information Security Incidents How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents January 13, 2015 human error prevention in manufacturing | By Nicole van Deursen Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents http://www.facilitiesnet.com/datacenters/article/How-to-Minimize-Human-Error-Prevent-Data-Center-Downtime-Facilities-Management-Data-Centers-Feature--14223 on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Twitter Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on Facebook Share How to Reduce Human Error in Information Security Incidents on LinkedIn According to the 2014 IBM Chief https://securityintelligence.com/how-to-reduce-human-error-in-information-security-incidents/ Information Security Officer Assessment, 95 percent of information security incidents involve human error. Human error is not only the most important factor affecting security, but it is also a key factor in aviation accidents and in medical errors. Information security risk managers and chief information security officers can benefit from the insights of studies on the human factor within these industries to reduce human error related to security. What Is Human Error? Human errors are usually defined as circumstances in which planned actions, decisions or behaviors reduce — or have the potential to reduce — quality, safety and security. Examples of human error involved in information security include the following: System misconfiguration; Poor patch management; Use of default usernames and passwords or easy-to-guess passwords; Lost devices; Disclosure of information via an incorrect email address; Double-clicking on an unsafe URL or attachment; Sharing passwords with others; Leaving computers unattended when outside the workplace; Using personally owned mobile devices that connect to the organization's network. Human
super-human speed. You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser. A third-party browser plugin, such human error in as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article. After completing the CAPTCHA below, you will immediately regain access to http://www.biopharminternational.com. You reached this page when attempting to access http://www.biopharminternational.com/reducing-human-error from 91.108.176.65 on 2016-10-20 16:58:08 GMT.Trace: 6081AFC2-96E6-11E6-94CF-DE6098317D02 via 1783f4da-3067-4d41-b6db-ae677c3cfd82
ENVIS iDRM Home » Key Concepts » iDRM Training Modules » 7 - Human Factors vs Accident Causation » Strategies for reducing human error · Strategies for reducing human error Reducing human error involves far more than taking disciplinary action against an individual. There are a range of measures which are more effective controls including the design of the equipment, job, procedures and training. The design guidance developed consists of two forms: design principles and a three step process for systematically addressing human errors in design. The relationships between the guidance developed, human error occurrence and consequence in system operation, and conventional engineering design and design change processes are shown in Figure below. The three-step process helps in the following:- Make goals and system state visible, interfaces should make accessible, information in a form so that system state can be easily related to system operational goals. Provide a good conceptual model It is important that operators must be able to develop a good conceptual model of the plant systems from training, from the design of the interface between the operator and the plant, and from observations of system operation. The information from these three sources should be consistent and complementary to reduce the possibility of operating errors. Make the acceptable regions of operation visible directly indicating the acceptable, unacceptable, and desired regions of system operation in process and state displays can act as a visual aid. This reduces dependence on user memory recall and the need for dynamic context dependent determinations. The adequacy of plant process state can thus be judged more readily against performance targets. Make process and automation behaviour predictable. Errors have a better chance of being detected if the normal behavior of plant processes and automation is predictable. Employ affordances. Apply design features that visibly convey the possibilities for action. Make the options for functional control visible. Errors in planning and action execution can be minimized if controls are visible so that the possibilities and limits for action are known. Provide appropriate feedback. Always provide feedback for an operator's actions. Feedback can take many forms. As a minimum, feedback should convey the impa