Difference Between Error Proofing And Mistake Proofing
Contents |
The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Error-Proofing vs. Mistake-Proofing - Differences Forum User Name mistake proofing examples Keep Me Logged In Password Register Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts
Error Proofing Examples
Search Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s) Some people have been having Password Reset issues (especially "Hotmail" accounts). If you mistake proofing poka yoke have a problem, contact the Peachfarm Internet Properties IT techs directly at peachfarmllc {at} neomailbox.ch (Switzerland) and we will resolve your problem(s) within 12 hours. Hello, Unregistered! You are currently browsing which one of the following is the best example of error-proofing the "Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations" forum. Unlike threads in the other forums, Discussion Threads in this forum are listed Alphabetically, rather than by 'Latest Post'. You can step through the pages to find the Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and/or Interpretations you are looking for, or you can Search this forum with the Search This Forum search link. You can also Sort the
How To Error Proof A Process
listing in a number of ways by clicking on the Column Headers. Please Contact the Administrator if you have any questions. Community Links Social Groups Pictures & Albums Registered Visitors Search the Cove Forum Discussion Threads Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Forum Search Search Elsmar Unanswered Threads Find All Thanked Posts Search Blogs Tag Search Advanced Forum Search Go to Page... Error-Proofing vs. Mistake-Proofing - Differences Elsmar XML RSS Feed Monitor the Elsmar Forum Monitor New Forum Posts Sponsor Links Courtesy Quick Links Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge: International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies ASQ - American Society for Quality International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information Howard'sInternational Quality Services Marcelo Antunes'SQR Consulting, andMedical Devices Expert Forum Bob DoeringBob Doering's Blogs and,Correct SPC - Precision Machining Ajit BasrurClaritas Consulting, LLC NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers Quality Digest IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes Post Num
occur or makes the error immediately obvious once it has occurred. When to Use Mistake Proofing When a process step has been identified where human error error proofing vs mistake proofing can cause mistakes or defects to occur, especially in processes that mistake proofing ppt rely on the worker’s attention, skill or experience. In a service process, where the customer can make an
Mistake Proofing Levels
error which affects the output. At a hand-off step in a process, when output or (for service processes) the customer is transferred to another worker. When a minor error http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=16343 early in the process causes major problems later in the process. When the consequences of an error are expensive or dangerous. Mistake–Proofing Procedure Obtain or create a flowchart of the process. Review each step, thinking about where and when human errors are likely to occur. For each potential error, work back through the process to find its source. For http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/process-analysis-tools/overview/mistake-proofing.html each error, think of potential ways to make it impossible for the error to occur. Consider: Elimination—eliminating the step that causes the error. Replacement—replacing the step with an error-proof one. Facilitation—making the correct action far easier than the error. If you cannot make it impossible for the error to occur, think of ways to detect the error and minimize its effects. Consider inspection method, setting function and regulatory function. Choose the best mistake-proofing method or device for each error. Test it, then implement it. Three kinds of inspection methods provide rapid feedback: Successive inspection is done at the next step of the process by the next worker. Self-inspection means workers check their own work immediately after doing it. Source inspection checks, before the process step takes place, that conditions are correct. Often it’s automatic and keeps the process from proceeding until conditions are right. Setting functions are the methods by which a process parameter or product attribute is inspected for errors: The contact or physical method checks a physical characteristic such as diameter or tempera
The concept was first put to widespread use by Shigeo Shingo within the Toyota Production System (TPS).Objective:PREVENT a defect from occurring and when this is not http://www.six-sigma-material.com/Mistake-Proofing.html possible, DETECT the defect every time one occurs. There are various levels, effort, and costs of error proofing. The team needs to identify the optimal states and examine feasibility https://www.moresteam.com/toolbox/error-proofing.cfm of implementation in the new product or process KPIV's. He recognized three types of poka-yokes: Contact method - identifies defects by testing product characteristics.Fixed-value - a specific number of mistake proofing movements every time.Sequence method - determines if procedure were followed. Defects found in later operations or steps of a process have more costs associated with them. There are more materials, labor, overhead, previously reworked product that are at risk. Ultimately if the product gets to the customer as a defect, the intangibles, such as reputation, can exceed the tangible cost.For difference between error example, a carbon monoxide detector will not be as effective if the inputs of dangerous and tolerable PPM levels are not known, or if the proper location for installation is not clear.GOOD: Detect defect before proceeding to next step.BETTER: Detects defects while in process at an operation.BEST: Prevent defects from occurring at all.Each process should have error-proofing to ensure defects are not passed on to the next step and that each operation has mistake proofing in place to ensure only defect free parts are accepted in. Connection to the FMEA The FMEA has three categories of:1) Severity2) Detection3) OccurrenceMistake Proofing is applied to reduce the scores in Detection and Occurrence.Once a mistake proofing device or method is proven it is important that the GB/BB follow up with the Quality Department to update the company FMEA if applicable. Risk reduction is another soft savings benefit from a Six Sigma team (reducing the RPN number of a failure mode).The Six Sigma team also updates their own project FMEA and this becomes the Revised FMEA in the CON
Team Partners Careers Contact Us E-LEARNING & CERTIFICATION e-Learning Home Course Catalog New to e-Learning? Training for Deployments Training for Individuals Blended Black Belt Black Belt Green Belt Transactional Green Belt Yellow Belt Master Black Belt Compare Belt Courses Lean Methods Kaizen Leader Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Short Courses Language Options Certification Home Black Belt Certification Green Belt Certification Master Black Belt Certification SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY Software Web-based Data Analysis- EngineRoom Desktop Data Analysis- EngineRoom for Excel Simulation- Process Playground Training Simulations New to Simulations? SigmaBrew DMAIC SigmaBrew InBox Learning Lab - St. Sigma Sherlock Holmes Zombie Hunter Enterprise Technology Project Tracking - TRACtion Online Testing - Crucible Admin Tools - Wave Machine BLENDED LEARNING Blended Learning Home Blended Learning Basics The Playbook Research Examples KNOWLEDGE CENTER All Free Resources New to Lean Six Sigma? Webcasts Toolbox (Tutorials) Papers & Articles The Playbook SigmaPedia Metrics Lean Resource Center Blog Newsletter MORESTEAM UNIVERSITY Student Login Support Center Alumni Network SUPPORT > Knowledge Center > Toolbox > Error-Proofing Error-Proofing Definition: Error-proofing refers to the implementation of fail-safe mechanisms to prevent a process from producing defects. This activity is also know by the Japanese term poka-yoke, from poka (inadvertent errors) and yokeru (to avoid) - pronounced POH-kuh YOH-kay. Although this common-sense concept has been around for a long time, it was more fully developed and popularized by Shigeo Shingo in Japan. The philosophy behind error proofing is that it is not acceptable to make even a very small number of defects, and the only way to achieve this goal is to prevent them from happening in th