E/error Proofing-direct-4.txt 4
Contents |
username or password?Sign in via your institutionOpenAthens loginOther institution loginHelpJournalsBooksRegisterJournalsBooksRegisterSign inHelpcloseSign in using your ScienceDirect credentialsUsernamePasswordRemember meForgotten username or password?Sign in via your institutionOpenAthens loginOther institution login
Error Proofing Methods
Advanced search Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Supports Open mistake proofing examples Access About this Journal Sample Issue Online Submit your Article Get new article feed Get new Open Access article mistake proofing six sigma feed Your selection(s) could not be saved due to an internal error. Please try again. Added to Favorites [remove] Add to Favorites Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved JavaScript is
Mistake Proofing Examples Ppt
disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process IndustriesArticles in Press - Note to users < Previous vol/iss No next vol/iss Articles in Press Open Access articlesOpenVolumes 41 - 44 (2016)OpenVolumes 31 - 40 (2014 - 2016)OpenVolumes 21 - 30 (2008 - 2014)OpenVolumes 11 - 20 (1998 - 2007)OpenVolumes
Mistake Proofing Lean
1 - 10 (1988 - 1997) Download and Export 0 checked results Export citations HelpDirect export Export fileRIS (for EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite)BibTeXTextRefWorks Direct ExportContentCitations OnlyCitations and Abstracts All access types All access types Open Access articlesOpen Archive articles Articles in Press are accepted, peer reviewed articles that are not yet assigned to volumes/issues, but are citable using DOI - find out more.A flammability (risk) index for use in transportation of flammable liquidsOriginal Research ArticleIn Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 5 October 2016Phani K. RajAbstractClose research highlightsPurchase PDF - $35.95 Highlights•A new way of looking at (flammability) hazards arising from flammable liquid transportation is discussed.•Vapor pressure, traditionally used as a surrogate to classify flammable liquids into different transportation packaging is shown as only one of three other parameters that determine the flammability hazards of liquids.•A new flammability index, based on considerations of true vapor pressure, range of flammability concentrations of vapor in air and the minimum ignition energy, is defined.•The application of this flammability index indicates that ethanol is much more flammable than crude oil.Not entitled to full textOverpressure calculation for unvented partial volume deflagrationsOriginal Research
and Guidance Office of Data Management Announcements Initiatives & Events International Protection Employee Locator Contact Patents TRADEMARKS Trademark Search Trademarks Process News & Notices Manuals, Guides, Official Gazette Laws & Regulations Online Filing Contact Trademarks error proofing vs mistake proofing IP LAW & POLICY Rulemaking IP Policy and Enforcement Protecting IP Overseas Training
Mistake Proofing Examples In Manufacturing
and Education Training Programs & Conferences Office of Governmental Affairs Office of Chief Economist Boards and Counsel PRODUCTS & SERVICES Electronic mistake proofing levels Data Products XML Resources XML Resources - Retrospective USPTO Contact Center Order Form Services Locate Libraries Training/Events Online Services Hub INVENTORS Patents for Inventors Trademarks for Inventors Inventors Assistance Education and Information Scam http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/aip/09504230 Prevention Pro Se and Pro Bono Current Events State Resources InventorsEye Newsletter NEWS & NOTICES Subscription Center Press Releases Testimony and Speeches Director's Forum Systems Status Emergency Notices USPTO Videos Official Gazette Federal Register Notices Event Calendar FAQs Patents FAQs Trademarks FAQs Assignments Security Musicians and Artists Browser Plugins Other Web Resources ABOUT US USPTO Leadership USPTO Organization USPTO Offices Careers Budget, Performance, and Planning Statistics Vendor http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s608.html Information Public Advisory Committees National Medal of Technology and Innovation IP in Motion Contact Us Home Page Patents Patent Laws, Regulations, Policies & Procedures Manual of Patent Examining Procedure Chapter 0600 Section 608 608 Disclosure [R-11.2013] To obtain a valid patent, a patent application as filed must contain a full and clear disclosure of the invention in the manner prescribed by 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The requirement for an adequate disclosure ensures that the public receives something in return for the exclusionary rights that are granted to the inventor by a patent. All amendments and claims must find descriptive basis in the original disclosure. No new matter may be introduced into an application after its filing date. Applicant may rely for disclosure upon the specification with original claims and drawings, as filed. See also 37 CFR 1.121(f) and MPEP §608.04. If during the course of examination of a patent application, an examiner notes the use of language that could be deemed offensive to any race, religion, sex, ethnic group, or nationality, he or she should object to the use of the language as failing to comply with 37CFR 1.3 which proscribes the presentation of papers which are lacking in decor
a computer's TCP/IP configuration to point at a rogue DNS server under the control of an attacker, or through modifying the behaviour of a trusted DNS server so that it does https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking not comply with internet standards. These modifications may be made for malicious purposes such as phishing, or for self-serving purposes by Internet service providers (ISPs) and public/router-based online DNS server providers to direct users' web traffic to the ISP's own web servers where advertisements can be served, statistics collected, or other purposes of the ISP; and by DNS service providers to block access to selected domains mistake proofing as a form of censorship. Contents 1 Technical background 1.1 Rogue DNS server 1.2 Manipulation by ISPs 1.3 Manipulation by registrars 2 Response 3 Remedy 4 See also 5 References Technical background[edit] One of the functions of a DNS server is to translate a domain name into an IP address that applications need to connect to an Internet resource such as a website. This functionality is defined mistake proofing examples in various formal internet standards that define the protocol in considerable detail. DNS servers are implicitly trusted by internet-facing computers and users to correctly resolve names to the actual addresses that are registered by the owners of an internet domain. Rogue DNS server[edit] A rogue DNS server translates domain names of desirable websites (search engines, banks, brokers, etc.) into IP addresses of sites with unintended content, even malicious websites. Most users depend on DNS servers automatically assigned by their ISPs. Zombie computers use DNS-changing trojans to invisibly switch the automatic DNS server assignment by the ISP to manual DNS server assignment from rogue DNS servers.[citation needed] A router's assigned DNS servers can also be altered through the remote exploitation of a vulnerability within the router's firmware.[1] When users try to visit websites, they are instead sent to a bogus website. This attack is termed pharming. If the site they are redirected to is a malicious website, masquerading as a legitimate website, in order to fraudulently obtain sensitive information, it is termed phishing.[2] Manipulation by ISPs[edit] A number of consumer ISPs such as Cablevision's Optimum Online,[3] Comcast,[4] Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN,[5] Rogers,[6] Charter Communications, Plusnet,[7] Verizon,[8] Sprint,[9] T-