Error Information Manufacturing Proofing Technique
Contents |
globally competitive Most individuals would probably be satisfied if processes were followed to the letter 99 percent of error proofing examples in manufacturing the time, but let’s put that into context. If
Error Proofing Methods
things are done correctly 99 percent of the time, that equates to two unsafe landings mistake proofing examples at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport each day; 16,000 pieces of lost mail each hour; 20,000 incorrect drug prescriptions each year; or 500 incorrect surgical procedures mistake proofing definition completed each week. In manufacturing, the slightest of errors, for example one-tenth of a percent, can have a significant impact on a company’s financial performance and profitability. Manufacturing errors are typically a result of missed process steps, mis-set work pieces, faulty machine operation, adjustment errors, setup errors, or bad tool
Error Proofing Lean
or fixture preparation. Eliminating product defects through error-proofing will yield better quality, lower costs, better predictability, less rework and redundant inspections, improved scrap rates, and reduced variability, because the part will be manufactured right the first time. How Error-Proofing Relates to Lean Manufacturing Because it aims to reduce defects, error-proofing is a key component of lean manufacturing. Error-proofing impacts every area of lean manufacturing, including inventory, processing, correction, overproduction, motion, material movement and waiting. In short, error-proofing and lean manufacturing both aim to eliminate any activity outside the normal value stream. For example, the results of error-proofing can easily be seen in the area of overproduction. Manufacturers may make the decision to overproduce a part because a certain scrap rate is expected. In this case, manufacturers have introduced more waste into the process. Effective error-proofing can eliminate the need for overproduction by producing the parts correctly
Lee Mr Gobalan Santhivallu Engr. Murelitharan a/l Muniandy Ms Joysca Ng Encik Mohd Zahari Bin Ismail Mr Ravichandran Mr Amos Andrew Encik Hanifah Syukri mistake proofing examples ppt Bin Abd Aziz Training Programs PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH WORK / TIME error proofing vs mistake proofing / MOTION STUDY TRIZ -The Inventive Problem Solving Method Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) SINGLE-MINUTE EXCHANGE OF
Mistake Proofing Six Sigma
DIE (SMED) LEAN MANUFACTURING BREAKTHROUGH TECHNIQUES ERROR-PROOF MANUFACTURING BY POKA-YOKE TECHNIQUES Training Programs / Customized Programs SMED Performance Major Performance Consultancy ERROR-PROOF MANUFACTURING BY POKA-YOKE TECHNIQUES https://www.competitiveproduction.com/articles/error-proofing-the-machining-process/ INTRODUCTION Poka-Yoke is Japanese for mistake-proofing developed by a Japanese Industrial Engineer, Shigeo Shingo. The Practice of Poka-Yoke then arose in the Japanese manufacturing community to enhance the quality of products by preventing mistakes in the production line for achieving Zero Defects. The concept is simple. If mistakes are not permitted to enter http://www.mymconsultancy.com/index.php/training-programs/error-proof-manufacturing-by-poka-yoke-techniques the production line, then quality will be high and rework low. The result increases customer satisfaction and lower cost at the same time. The end result is high customer value and better profit margin. Therefore, this course will equip the participants with powerful Attitude, Skills and Knowledge to make their workplace more productive and satisfying. BENEFITS Improve Human and Machine performance. Leads to Zero defects. Eliminate wastes related to Quality problems. Increased productivity. Increased customer satisfaction. TARGET AUDIENCE Process / Industrial/ Design Engineers Manufacturing and Quality Executives / Supervisors / Technicians Facilities and Maintenance Engineers / Supervisors / Technicians DURATION & FEES 2 days in-house - 9.00am to 5.00pm Training Fee – SBL Claimable (inclusive of training fees, materials and certificate of attendance). METHODOLOGY Seminars Group presentations / Discussions Pre & Post test Practical on Production Floor / Gemba COURSE CONTENTS DAY ONE Introduction to Error-Proofing Learning Objectives Why Mistake Proofing Elements of Production Operator Materials Method Machin
Management Companies & Executives Corporate Culture Corporate Responsibility Growth Strategies Strategic Planning http://www.industryweek.com/webinar/bmgi-simple-mistake-proofing & Execution Global EconomyCompetitiveness Demographics Emerging Markets Environment Legislation Public Policy Regulations Trade OperationsEnergy Management Lean / Six Sigma Maintenance Quality Safety FinanceBudgeting & Reporting Corporate Finance & Tax Cost Management & BPM Governance, Risk & Compliance Software & Systems Treasury & Cash Management WorkforceCompensation Strategies Education mistake proofing / Training Engagement Labor / Employment Policy Recruiting / Retention Teamwork InnovationIntellectual Property Process Improvement Product Development Research & Development Supply ChainCustomer Relationships Inventory Management Logistics Planning & Forecasting Procurement Supplier Relationships Transportation Warehousing and Distribution TechnologyAutomation Digital Tools Emerging Technologies Energy Information Technology Machine Tools Robotics mistake proofing examples Systems Integration Expansion ManagementIndustry Clusters Strategic Siting ResourcesIW 1000 IW US 500 IW 50 Best US Manufacturers IW Manufacturing Hall of Fame IW Salary Survey IW Best Plants IW Manufacturing & Technology Show IW Best Practices Reports IW Industry Reports Benchmarking Associations Glossary Advertisement Home > Human Error & Mistake Proofing: Simple Changes for Everyday Mistakes Course details Overview To err is human. Because most processes involve people, and all people make mistakes, even the best laid process improvements can go awry. The trainingbegins with an introduction of a behaviorist model providing a framework to think about and understand specific behaviors that result in human errors. According to one prominent theory, human errors occur in primarily three modes: skill-based, rule-based and knowledge-based situations. The model provides a useful context for how to recognize the three situations when humans o