Asa Error No Valid Adjacency
Contents |
Us Twitter Google + LinkedIn Newsletter Instagram YouTube Facebook DirectoryNetwork InfrastructureWAN, Routing and Switching LAN, Switching drop-reason (no-adjacency) no valid adjacency and Routing Network Management Remote Access Optical Networking routing failed to locate next hop Getting Started with LANs IPv6 Integration and Transition EEM Scripting Other Subjects SecurityVPN
What Is My Ip
Security Management Firewalling Intrusion Prevention Systems/IDS AAA, Identity and NAC Physical Security MARS Email Security Web Security Other Subjects Service ProvidersMetro MPLS Voice Over IP XR OS and Platforms Video Other Subjects Collaboration, Voice and VideoIP Telephony Video Over IP Jabber Clients Unified Communications Applications TelePresence Digital Media System Contact Center Conferencing UC Migrations Other Subjects Wireless - MobilitySecurity and Network Management Wireless IP Voice and Video Getting Started with Wireless WLCCA Other Subjects ServicesCisco ServiceGrid Connected Analytics Smart Call Home Smart Net Total Care Operations Exchange Mobile ApplicationsCisco Proximity Cisco Technical Support Online Tools and ResourcesCisco Bug Discussions Technical Documentation Ideas Cisco CLI Analyzer Support Community Help Data CenterApplication Centric Infrastructure Application Networking Intelligent Automation Server Networking Storage Networking Unified Computing Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Other Subjects Small BusinessNetwork Storage Routers Security Surveillance Switches Voice and Conferencing Wireless Solutions and ArchitecturesBorderless Networks Collaboration Cisco User GroupsSeattle Cisco User Group (SEACUG) Silicon Valley Cisco User Group (SVCUG) Southern California Cisco User Group (SCCUG) Cisco Certifications Cisco.com Idea Center Cisco Cafe Expert CornerTop Contributors Leaderboards Cisco Live! Events Events Community CornerAwards & Recognit
redundancy. The following command lines are required to forward SMTP traffic through the ISP2: route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.254 1 route out-backup 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.0.254 2 nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global (outside) 1 interface global (out-backup) 1 interface static (out-backup,inside) tcp 0.0.0.0 smtp 0.0.0.0 smtp netmask 0.0.0.0 The static statement is a destination NAT (outside NAT) and forces any SMTP traffic to be forwarded through the secondary ISP, even with the default route pointing to the ISP1 gateway. The default route with a higher administrative distance is necessary to route the outboundtraffic andfor https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11967411/access-issues-no-valid-adjacency the reverse trafficto beaccepted via out-backup. If this route is not implemented, the following error happens: Result: input-interface: inside input-status: up input-line-status: up output-interface: out-backup output-status: up output-line-status: up Action: drop Drop-reason: (no-adjacency) No valid adjacency I have ran two traffic simulations to demonstrate how the firewall would handle HTTP and SMTP traffic for the same source and destination. HTTP traffic simulation: asa# packet-tracer input http://packetsneverlie.blogspot.com/2010/10/forwarding-services-through-secondary.html inside tcp 192.168.100.25 80 172.31.0.100 80 Phase: 1 Type: FLOW-LOOKUP Subtype: Result: ALLOW Config: Additional Information: Found no matching flow, creating a new flow Phase: 2 Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP Subtype: input Result: ALLOW Config: Additional Information: in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside Phase: 3 Type: ACCESS-LIST Subtype: log Result: ALLOW Config: access-group inside_access_in in interface inside access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any Additional Information: Phase: 4 Type: IP-OPTIONS Subtype: Result: ALLOW Config: Additional Information: Phase: 5 Type: NAT Subtype: Result: ALLOW Config: nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 match ip inside any outside any dynamic translation to pool 1 (192.168.0.1 [Interface PAT]) translate_hits = 8, untranslate_hits = 0 Additional Information: Dynamic translate 192.168.100.25/80 to 192.168.0.1/405 using netmask 255.255.255.255 Phase: 6 Type: NAT Subtype: host-limits Result: ALLOW Config: nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 match ip inside any outside any dynamic translation to pool 1 (192.168.0.1 [Interface PAT]) translate_hits = 8, untranslate_hits = 0 Additional Information: Phase: 7 Type: IP-OPTIONS Subtype: Result: ALLOW Config: Additional Information: Phase: 8 Type: FLOW-CREATION Subtype: Result: ALLOW Config: Additional Information: New flow created with id 23, packet dispatched to next module Result: input-interface: inside input-status: up input-line-status: up output-interface: outside output-status: up output-line-status: up Action: a
clients that connect correctly and can acces the internal network. However for the profiles I have setup to connect via VPN to the DMZ network fails with the following messages. ASA-6-110003: http://networking.bigresource.com/Cisco-VPN-ASA-6-110003-Routing-failed-to-locate-next-hop-OZh73cra1.html Routing failed to locate next hop & ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection......No valid adjacency https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/519424-cisco-asa-new-ip-range I have connections to the DMZ which aren't VPN but are via the outside and internal interfaces with no problem. The route table has a route to that network, and I have a nat in place View 12 Replies Similar Messages: Cisco Firewall :: Routing Failed To Locate Next Hop For UDP 500 Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 no valid Routing Failed To Locate Next Hop Cisco VPN :: 5505 - Routing Failed To Locate Next Hop For TCP From Internet Cisco :: Direct Attached ASA5505 Failed To Locate Next HOP Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Failed To Locate Egress Interface? Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Failed To Locate Egress Interface Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 / Failed To Locate Egress Interface For TCP From DMZ Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3845 - License no valid adjacency Installation Failed With Error / XML Parsing Failed Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Secondary SUP Has Failed Cisco Switching/Routing :: POE Failed On NME-16ES-1G-P / Need To Configure Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - LCP Failed To Go Online? Cisco Switching/Routing :: Replace A Failed SUP On 6500 Sup32 Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Fan Failed But Switch Is Still Running? Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5020 - Fan Chassis Failed Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750X Upgrade Failed? Cisco Switching/Routing :: Failed Supervisor On 6509 Chassis? Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1811/k9 DDR Memory Test Failed? Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Switch IOS Upgrade Failed Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Failed To Read Transceiver Serial Cisco Switching/Routing :: GLC-T Error SFP Validation Failed On Nexus 5548 Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / Replacing Failed Member In Stackwise? Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2821 - HTTPS Logging / SSL Get Context Failed Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2950 Failed Password Reset? Cannot Locate Own Security Key Locate The Security Key? Locate My Encryption Key? Cisco Switching/Routing :: Core 4506 HA (redundancy) Up-link Interface Failed? Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3745 Router Failed To Exchange The Reference Signal Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat 3750E Failed To Send HRPC Non Blocking Message ADVERTISEMENT Cisco Firewall :: Routing Failed To Locate Next Hop For UDP 500 Jun 13, 2013 we have a asa that block some ip dresse wi
minutes. Join Now Hello, before I was hired to my current position, a new IP phone system was installed on the network. The phones were given a new IP range/ For example: Data traffic - 10.0.0.0/16 Phones 10.1.0.0/16 I am forced to use the "computer" port on some of the phones due building constraints. The phones can access internal network resources just fine, but when they go out to the internet through the ASA I get the following message: Teardown TCP connection 55072458 for outside:74.125.196.84/443 to inside:10.1.0.24/52914 duration 0:00:00 bytes 0 No valid adjacency I didn't setup the firewall either- and i'm assuming it is an issue with the NAT, but I really don't know where to start the troubleshooting. Tags: CiscoReview it: (104) Reply Subscribe View Best Answer RELATED TOPICS: Cisco ASA - Top 10 Destinations - 108.171.130.176 Can a Cisco ASA do this? Cisco ASA   18 Replies Ghost Chili OP Doughnut Destroyer Jun 17, 2014 at 2:32 UTC Is there any documentation left over from the people who set this up? That will be your best bet if there is. If not then you may want to consider setting this up on your own terms. I wouldn't foresee it taking to long and this way you have peace of mind for the future. 0 Mace OP NetworkNerd Jun 17, 2014 at 2:35 UTC Are you familiar with how to login to ASDM and look at NAT rules? 1 Sonora OP Todd9945 Jun 17, 2014 at 4:08 UTC Yes, I can log into the ASDM and look at the NAT rules, but not quite sure what i'm looking for 0 Thai Pepper OP Dave Rossi Jun 17, 2014 at 4:13 UTC What is the IP and subnet of the internal interface of the ASA? 0 Sonora OP Todd9945 Jun 17, 2014 at 4:30 UTC inside IP 10.255.255.254 255.255.255.248 subnet 0 Sonora OP Todd9945 Jun 17, 2014 at 4:38 UTC 10.0.0.0/13 (data networks)- appears to have NAT working properly. I can add/remove access rules and it blocks/allows internet traffic 10.10.0./24 (phones)- internet traffic isn't working in this range (will work through a proxy, but not directly, even when I add an access rule for specific ip's or a range of ips. 0 Thai Pepper OP Dave Rossi Jun 17, 2014 at 4:40 UTC WOW.....Is there another piece of hardware involved?Seems like nothing would route properly through that.If your inside network is 10.0.0.0\16 and 10.1.0.0\16 the inside interface should be a 255.255.0.0 subnet, HUGE network. 0 Thai Pepper OP Dave Rossi Jun 17, 2014 at 4:41 UTC Are there some Typo's in your posts,