Named Error No Valid Rrsig Resolving
Contents |
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies error (insecurity proof failed) resolving of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business
Got Insecure Response; Parent Indicates It Should Be Secure
Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question bind dnssec-validation _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a disable dnssec bind question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top BIND server has tons of “no valid RRSIG” errors up vote 1 down vote favorite I have a forward-only BIND9 server running on the LAN and it logs hundreds of errors per day like: Aug 29 18:38:29 nuc named[850]: error (no valid RRSIG) resolving 'ubuntu.com/DS/IN': 75.75.75.75#53 Aug 29
Error (broken Trust Chain) Resolving
18:38:31 nuc named[850]: validating @0x7fc6d826ed50: com SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure Aug 29 18:38:31 nuc named[850]: error (no valid RRSIG) resolving 'medium.com/DS/IN': 75.75.75.75#53 Aug 29 18:38:31 nuc named[850]: validating @0x7fc6d4014b80: com SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure It appears clients are still getting results, but these messages are filling up the logs. Relevant lines in named.conf: forwarders { # Comcast 2001:558:feed::1; 2001:558:feed::2; 75.75.75.75; 75.75.76.76; }; forward only; dnssec-enable yes; dnssec-validation auto; dnssec-lookaside auto; What do these errors really mean is happening? Is this a misconfiguration on my end or Comcast's? domain-name-system bind dnssec share|improve this question edited Aug 30 '15 at 5:32 chicks 2,16841328 asked Aug 30 '15 at 2:51 jmw 813 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted It looks like Comcast's servers are deliberately stripping out DNSSEC signatures from the responses they're giving you, so your server cannot validate com. (in this case) even though it knows that one should be signed. This is unlikely to cause any directly noticeable problems, it just leaves you and your users wi
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation named no valid signature found Social Media Facebook Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! dnssec-validation auto Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Specialised Support
Opendns Dnssec
Ubuntu Servers, Cloud and Juju Server Platforms [ubuntu] Bind no longer resolves internet DNS queries after upgrading to 12.04 Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? http://serverfault.com/questions/717775/bind-server-has-tons-of-no-valid-rrsig-errors < is the place to report it, thanks ! Results 1 to 4 of 4 Thread: Bind no longer resolves internet DNS queries after upgrading to 12.04 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode May 22nd, 2012 #1 DarwinLabs View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message First Cup of Ubuntu Join Date Jan 2009 Beans 11 Bind no longer resolves internet https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1984950 DNS queries after upgrading to 12.04 Hello, I am no longer able to query any external DNS names such as google.com or ubuntu.com after upgrading to 12.04 Server but I am still able to do internal ones. I noticed the following in the syslog: error (no valid RRSIG) resolving 'ubuntu.com/DS/IN': 192.48.79.30#53 validating @0x7f249c0975e0: com SOA: no valid signature found validating @0x7f249c0975e0: 88V0RT7EQ1MFFA632RRT4O1UDIU0GNQF.com How do I fix this issue, I didn't have this problem before upgrading to 12.04 and haven't touched any configs I also made sure it didn't replace any configurations during the upgrade. Thanks Adv Reply May 23rd, 2012 #2 hawkmage View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Dipped in Ubuntu Join Date Dec 2010 Beans 572 DistroUbuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin Re: Bind no longer resolves internet DNS queries after upgrading to 12.04 I have a feeling you are falling victim of the switch from the standard libc based name resolution to the dnsmask that is not a plugin to NetworkManager. To solve my issue with this I had to disable the dnsmask plugin in the NetworkManager config file and install the full dnsmask package and configure it. It seams that there is no way, at least none that I could find, to configure the options of the NetworkManager dnsmask plugin. There was a thread o
lundi 2 décembre 2013 Publié dans Administration . DNS . Réseau Ecrire Dec 2 11:21:22 vmb-ld7-proxydns named[3951]: error https://blog.hbis.fr/2013/12/02/bind-no_valid_rrsig/ (no valid RRSIG) resolving 'google.fr/DS/IN': 192.168.0.153#53 root@proxydns:~# nano /etc/bind/named.conf.options options { forward only; forwarders { 192.168.0.153; 192.168.0.154; }; //dnssec-validation auto; dnssec-enable no; dnssec-validation no; }; https://linuxformat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14505 Remarque : la désactivation de DNSSEC ne devrait être faite que dans le cas d’un serveur de cache interne, limité à un groupe de travail. no valid Articles associés : Bind : serveur DNS en forward uniquement (cache DNS) Bind : configuration split DNS Bind : sécuriser les communications serveurs Stockage de données en cache RAM Bind: cache forward & error (no valid RRSIG) resolving Commentaires (0) Trackbacks are closed. Ecrire Pas encore de commentaires. Cliquez ici named error no pour annuler la réponse. Nom(requis) Email(requis) - ne sera pas publié - URL Debian : forcer la métrique d’une interface réseau Debian : coloration du prompt Haut de page Commentaires récents nelcron dans Mac OS X : masquer un utilisateur de la login boxkenmoe joby dans Debian 6 : configuration dual-stack IPv4 / IPv6omra 2016 dans Java : log syslog avec log4jtab dans Zabbix : monitoring de Dovecottab dans Zabbix : monitoring de Dovecot Articles récents Linux : fixer la keymap d’un clavier mac alu FR 29 septembre 2016 Docker : collection d’images Alpine Linux pour intégration avec Consul 22 mai 2016 Docker : erreur au build «Failed to create thread: Resource temporarily unavailable (11)» 25 mars 2016 Maven : vérifier les mises à jour disponibles 6 mars 2016 NetworkManager : désactiver la gestion d’une interface réseau 6 mars 2016 Firefox : supprimer la configuration HSTS d’un site
Login Internal/External Network configuration The place to post if you need help or advice Moderators: ChriThor, LXF moderators Post a reply 21 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 Internal/External Network configuration by dizwell » Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:57 pm ServerA (192.168.0.1) has a wireless connection to the Internet. A home-brew DNS ServerB (192.168.0.2) runs Bind for internal host names resolution, with its default gateway set to .1 My DesktopA (192.168.0.50) has 192.168.0.2 set as its name server in /etc/resolve.conf. It also knows that ServerA is the default gateway, and has that IP address (.1) configured accordingly. A DesktopB (192.168.0.51) also exists and is similarly configured From my desktop, I can do 'ping DesktopB' and it resolves that to the .51 address and gets a return happily. Same thing in reverse (i.e., DesktopB can ping DesktopA by name, without issue). If either desktop says "ping www.google.com", however, we get nothing. Internal names are resolved, in other words, but nothing which points outside the building. I am unclear how to configure the DNS server to say, "I cannot resolve this, so let me pass it on to the external (ISP) nameservers", especially when to do so would require the DNS server to know to route the request via ServerA and its wireless connection. (Which it's supposed to, because it's been told that ServerA is the default gateway and it knows from the forwarders section of named.conf what the ISP's nameservers' IP addresses are). All machines are running Centos 6.2, 64-bit. All have .1 configured as the default gateway. The ServerB has itself configured as its DNS1 server in /netword-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, but does have "forward first;" and "forwarders { 61.9.211.1; 61.9.195.193; };" set in its named.conf (those are the IP addresses of my ISP's dns servers). Any guidance, please, would be appreciated. dizwell Posts: 61Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:05 pm Top by wyliecoyoteuk » Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:14 pm It is basically how you set authoritative servers. if you set a server as authoritative for your domain, it should function for your internal domain and pass everything else outside The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it! *************** ************ wyliecoyoteuk LXF regular Posts: 3521Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 10:41 pmLocation: Birmingham, UK Top by dizwell » Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:28 pm Yup. That