Error 601 Sql Server
Contents |
Read Comments (4) | Related Tips: More > Database Consistency Checks DBCCs Problem When we are querying SQL Server tables with/without the NOLOCK hint we may get a page corruption error like this: "Could not sql server 2008 error 601 continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement". Today we will learn how to deal sql server error 229 with this issue. Solution In my particular case the error was raised in the Distribution database and was during the execution of sql server error log a SELECT operation with a NOLOCK hint and then I verified the same error without NOLOCK as well, this error is because one or more data pages are missing at the current position of the scanning sql server error 233 with/without NOLOCK locking hint so we can say we have corruption issue in the database. The root cause of this error is because pages were deleted or moved by page splits caused by DML statements so that SQL Server is not able to continue scan operation. In order to verify that it is a page corruption issue you can run the DBCC CHECKDB command with PHYSICAL_ONLY option. DBCC CHECKDB(MY_DATABASE) WITH PHYSICAL_ONLY As a result,
Sql Server Error 53
you may see many errors: Msg 8909, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 0, index ID -1, partition ID 0, alloc unit ID 0 (type Unknown), page ID (1:219356) contains an incorrect page ID in its page header. The PageId in the page header = (0:0). Msg 8909, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 0, index ID -1, partition ID 0, alloc unit ID 144115188075921408 (type Unknown), page ID (1:219368) contains an incorrect page ID in its page header. The PageId in the page header = (5385:-1048674823). Msg 8939, Level 16, State 98, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 0, index ID -1, partition ID 0, alloc unit ID 6989691077213028352 (type Unknown), page (29184:1694528512). Test (IS_OFF (BUF_IOERR, pBUF->bstat)) failed. Values are 133129 and -14. Msg 8909, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 From the output above we can validate for example that the allocation unit 144115188075921408 does not exist so this is the reason why “data pages are missing” and “(type Unknown)” appear in each message. Well, at this point we know it is a critical issue and now I will show more messages returned by the DBCC command: Msg 8928, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Object ID 501576825, index ID 1, partition ID 72057594040549376, alloc unit ID 7205759
(РуÑÑкий)ישר×ל (עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)ëŒ€í•œë¯¼êµ (í•œêµì–´)ä¸åŽäººæ°‘共和国 (ä¸æ–‡)å°ç£ (ä¸æ–‡)日本 (日本語)  HomeLibraryLearnDownloadsTroubleshootingCommunityForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: Msg 601: Could not continue scan with
Sql Server Error 2
NOLOCK due to data movement. SQL Server > SQL Server Database Engine sql server error 4064 Question 0 Sign in to vote Hi everybody, I have a stored procedure that dynamically builds and sql server error codes executes a CREATE VIEW or ALTER VIEW statement. It builds a very long statement (declare @sql varchar(max)), and then runs it via this command: execute(@sql) After 3-10 minutes, https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3289/error-601-could-not-continue-scan-with-nolock-due-to-sql-server-data-movement/ I get back the following error: Msg 601, Level 12, State 3, Procedure spr_SysSubVwrAutogen, Line 117 Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement. But when I output a print @sql, then cut/paste the @sql value into a new query window, it executes just fine--within 1-2 seconds. Why am I getting this nolock issue? It https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/f890d114-e4c4-4c38-811f-987a5efe26ac/msg-601-could-not-continue-scan-with-nolock-due-to-data-movement?forum=sqldatabaseengine never occurred until I performed a restore of the database, a week ago. Thank you for any help, Jason Monday, November 14, 2011 3:38 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Sorry, found the problem and had another problem to move on to! In case anybody else runs into this error message again, here is what was happening and how I resolved the situation: One of the queries involved selected from a view, call it vwTable, which was something like, 'SELECT * FROM tblTable with (nolock) WHERE trashflag!=1'. This became a problem once tblTable grew beyond 3 billion rows. I got rid of the nolock hint and also the WHERE clause, problem solved. Other queries significantly sped up as well. Hope this helps somebody. Jason Marked as answer by jasonwisdom Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:30 PM Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:56 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Hi, Could you run a DBCC CHECKDB? Thanks, Andrew Bainbridge SQL Server DBA Please click "Propose As Answer"
Server Error 601: Could not Continue Scan with NOLOCK due to Data Movement SQL Server Error 601: Could not Continue Scan with NOLOCK due to Data Movement Posted by Jan Dvořák on 21 April 2016, 9:49 pm We have noticed the following error message periodically during mass data update http://sqldot.com/sql-server-error-601-could-not-continue-scan-with-nolock-due-to-data-movement-2/ on one of our productions servers: ‘Error 601: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1420561-265-1.aspx due to data movement’. This server is hosting instance of SQL Server 2008R2 SP1 Standard edition. After some research we have found a detailed description of this issue in this KB article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960770/en-us. In our case the error was generated from a code similar to this pattern: DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (...) INSERT INTO @TempTable SELECT * FROM .... sql server INSERT INTO @TempTable select * from ( select distinct * from @TempTable ) tt cross join dbo.TableA a where a.Col1 >= 1 1234567891011 DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (...)INSERT INTO @TempTableSELECT * FROM ....INSERT INTO @TempTableselect *from ( select distinct * from @TempTable ) ttcross join dbo.TableA awhere a.Col1 >=1 The issue is that data are inserted into @TempTable at the same time when they are retrieved. Writing into this table is causing the sql server error reallocation of data pages which should first be read and at the time of reading they aren't located at the expected place. A simple and intuitive solution is code refactoring: Data are inserted into #Distinct temporary table first and after that used to prepare the final data to be inserted into @TempTable. This way we can prevent error to be fired. DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (...) INSERT INTO @TempTable SELECT * FROM .... SELECT DISTINCT * INTO #Distinct FROM @TempTable INSERT INTO @TempTable SELECT * FROM #Distinct tt cross join dbo.TableA a WHERE a.Col1 >= 1 GO 12345678910111213141516 DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (...)INSERT INTO @TempTableSELECT * FROM ....SELECT DISTINCT * INTO #DistinctFROM @TempTableINSERT INTO @TempTableSELECT *FROM #Distinct ttcross join dbo.TableA aWHERE a.Col1 >=1GO Related PostsFailed to initialize sqlcmd library with error number -2147024809SequencesIDENTITY column with negative incrementTransactional Replication Error: The row was not found at the Subscriber when applying the replicated command.How to override Table Value Constructor limit of maximum 1000 rows in direct INSERT statement Filed underBugs + KB | Comment | 132 views | Permalink | (No Ratings Yet) Loading... Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website CAPTCHA Code* Post navigation « Enable Remote Errors in Reporting Serv
Recent PostsRecent Posts Popular TopicsPopular Topics Home Search Members Calendar Who's On Home » SQL Server 7,2000 » Data Corruption » 601: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due... 601: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to Data movement Rate Topic Display Mode Topic Options Author Message christy.umorenchristy.umoren Posted Friday, February 15, 2013 7:58 AM SSC Rookie Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 8:52 AM Points: 25, Visits: 115 SCENARIO 1 Hi, i'm getting the error msg 601: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to Data movement‎ - from a job scheduled to run. This is how the error comes about;I have two sql servers, (both 2000) lets say A and B. server A is my production server while server B is my standby server. I scheduled a database and log backup on server A in which the destination for the backup files are on server B where its to be recovery (sort of like the log shipping we have in sql 2008).Now I have two jobs( say job1 and job2) scheduled on server A. Job1 is a procedure which is to perform a full backup and then a log backups to server B. Job2 is a procedure that is to recovery(restore) the backups from server B onto the standby server B in the order they were backed up.Pls note that job2 will also fail if job1 fail because there are no backup files for job2 to recovery.One day i noticed job1 had been failing causing job2 to also fail. On checking the job history and log files i saw that full backup will complete but log backup will fail with the above error causing the the job to fail...I have no NOLOCK statement in my procedureI have upgraded my service pack to SP4 because i was told its a service pack issue but still nothingI have ran DBCCC CHECKDB and no error was displayedSCENARIO 2 This scenario is exactly like Scenario 1, the only difference is that i get the above error when recovery of the 'log files' is being performed on server B (that means full database recovery is successful but log recovery fails) . So in the case, job1 is fine but job2 is failing.Pls can anyone help??! Post #1420561 David Webb-CDSDavid Webb-CDS Posted Friday, February 15, 2013 9:11 AM SSC Eights! Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Sunday, September 18, 2016 9:41 AM Points: 894, Visits: 8,574 The first que