Error Trigger Sql Server
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this sql server trigger error handling site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more
Triggers In Sql Server 2012
about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss triggers sql server 2005 Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Raising errors in triggers sql server management studio After Triggers Sql Server 2005 up vote 0 down vote favorite If I raise an error in an AFTER UPDATE trigger in Sql Server 2005, will that cause the update which caused the trigger to be fired to roll back, even if the statement was not executed within a transaction? Thanks. sql sql-server-2005 share|improve this question asked Nov 6 '09 at 16:50 Jordan 6491529
Ddl Triggers In Sql Server 2008
add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted No, you have to rollback transaction by calling ROLLBACK TRAN: CREATE TRIGGER trg_au_table ON dbo.table AFTER UPDATE AS BEGIN ROLLBACK TRAN END GO This example will prevent from updating any record. This: CREATE TRIGGER trg_au_table ON dbo.table AFTER UPDATE AS BEGIN RAISERROR('This is a test', 16, 1) END GO will only raise the error but the change will be made in the table. share|improve this answer answered Nov 6 '09 at 17:04 Lukasz Lysik 7,15813661 So, is there an implicit transaction? If I have not begun a transaction explicitly, will ROLLBACK TRAN cause any issues? Thanks! –Jordan Nov 6 '09 at 18:50 Yes, there is an implicit transaction. Update and trigger are closed in one transaction. Trigger is always in one transaction with DML or DDL statement. If you perform an UPDATE you have to wait until the statements in the trigger are finished. RAISERROR does not rollback transaction. –Lukasz Lysik Nov 6 '09 at 19:23 Noting that any rollback statement (without listing a savepoint) will rollback all existing open transa
up Recent PostsRecent Posts Popular TopicsPopular Topics Home Search Members Calendar Who's On Home » SQL Server 2012 » SQL Server 2012 - T-SQL » Trigger with RAISERROR types of triggers in sql server Trigger with RAISERROR Rate Topic Display Mode Topic Options Author Message PiManéPiMané Posted Monday, September update triggers in sql server 2008 examples 30, 2013 5:37 AM Mr or Mrs. 500 Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:45 AM Points: 576,
Triggers In Sql Server 2008 W3schools
Visits: 1,296 Hi,Why doesn't a RAISERROR inside an AFTER trigger "break" the transaction? Is there any flag or SET option to do it?I created a table with a trigger that just has RAISERROR and the UPDATE is http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1688866/raising-errors-in-after-triggers-sql-server-2005 executed any way...CREATE TABLE test (ID INT NOT NULL, Val INT);GOINSERT INTO test VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,3);GOCREATE TRIGGER trg_test_upd ON test AFTER UPDATEAS RAISERROR('Error', 16, 1)GOIf I execute:SELECT * FROM testBEGIN TRANUPDATE test SET val = 3 WHERE id = 1COMMIT TRANSELECT * FROM testThe update is committed even with the error raised from the trigger.The only way it isn't committed is if I have error handling:SELECT * FROM testBEGIN TRANBEGIN TRY UPDATE test http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1499938-3077-1.aspx SET val = 3 WHERE id = 1 COMMIT TRANEND TRYBEGIN CATCH ROLLBACK TRANEND CATCHSELECT * FROM test If you need to work better, try working less... Post #1499938 Sean PearceSean Pearce Posted Monday, September 30, 2013 6:35 AM Ten Centuries Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Monday, October 3, 2016 5:19 AM Points: 1,144, Visits: 3,432 You need to use ROLLBACK inside the trigger.CREATE TRIGGER trg_test_upd ON test AFTER UPDATEAS RAISERROR('Error', 16, 1); ROLLBACK;GO The SQL Guy @ blogspot@SeanPearceSQLAbout Me Post #1499961 Sean PearceSean Pearce Posted Monday, September 30, 2013 6:37 AM Ten Centuries Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Monday, October 3, 2016 5:19 AM Points: 1,144, Visits: 3,432 The behavior is the same with a stored procCREATE TABLE test (ID INT NOT NULL, Val INT);GOINSERT INTO test VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,3);GOCREATE PROCEDURE trg_test_updAS UPDATE test SET val = 3 WHERE id = 1 RAISERROR('Error', 16, 1);GOSELECT * FROM testBEGIN TRANEXEC trg_test_updCOMMIT TRANSELECT * FROM test The SQL Guy @ blogspot@SeanPearceSQLAbout Me Post #1499962 PiManéPiMané Posted Monday, September 30, 2013 7:39 AM Mr or Mrs. 500 Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:45 AM Points: 576, Visits: 1,296 Thanks,Thought that the XACT_ABORT should solve it but it doesn't. If you need to work better, try working less... Post #1500007 lshanahanlshanahan Posted Wednesday, October
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/8693/why-try-catch-does-not-suppress-exception-in-trigger and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/137305/can-we-commit-the-transaction-when-the-sql-server-trigger-fails the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Database Administrators Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Database Administrators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for database professionals who wish to improve their database skills and learn from others in sql server the community. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Why TRY CATCH does not suppress exception in trigger up vote 3 down vote favorite I have a trigger on a table (source) that data should be triggers in sql copied to the other one (target) in other database. I am trying to implement custom synchronization process for data: I want that target database (table) will be up to date to source database (table). I have 3 hundred tables to synchronize. Some of then have different physical data structure. I cannot use standard approaches of Sql Server (replication, DTS...) because of different data schema and other restrictions (time to implement, environment issues...). My goal is: this trigger should NOT impact on INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE of records in a source table. I tried so solution: CREATE TRIGGER dbo.MyTrigger ... AFTER INSERT .... BEGIN TRY --RAISERROR('Test error', 16, 2) END TRY BEGIN CATCH -- nothing END CATCH I have inserted RAISEERROR to simulate error. I hoped, try/catch suppressed that error and record was been inserted (deleted, or updated) successfully. Don't. It does not work. I got error: An error was raised during trigger execution. The batch has been aborted and the user transaction, if any, has been rolled back. Is it possible to realize my solution in this way. How can I c
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Database Administrators Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Database Administrators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for database professionals who wish to improve their database skills and learn from others in the community. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Can we commit the transaction when the sql server trigger fails? up vote 3 down vote favorite I am trying to avoid data loss when the insert trigger on a table fails. I am trying this with the following scenario and my code is failing. When an insert happens on the Customers table, I want to insert the same data into the Archive table. When the trigger fails, I don't want to roll back the entire transaction, which would lead to data loss on the Customers table. Even if the trigger fails, I want the data to be inserted in the Customers table, and the stored procedure should return the Customer_ID as usual. ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[Customer_Insert_Trigger_Test] ON [dbo].[Customers] AFTER INSERT AS BEGIN BEGIN TRY begin transaction; set nocount on; SAVE TRANSACTION InsertSaveHere; --Simulating error situation RAISERROR (N'This is message %s %d.', -- Message text. 11, -- Severity, 1, -- State, N'number', -- First argument. 5); -- Second argument. Insert into Archive select * from Inserted; commit transaction; END TRY BEGIN CATCH ROLLBACK TRANSACTION InsertSaveHere; END CATCH END My question is mostly around how to avoid the actual insert on customers table to roll back if the trigger fai