Ms Sql 2000 Ignore Error
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about sql server ignore_dup_key hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask
Sql Server Ignore Duplicate Key
Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. insert into ignore duplicates mysql Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How to Ignore “Duplicate Key” error in T-SQL (SQL Server) up vote 38 down vote favorite 9 I have a transaction that contains multiple SQL Statements (INSERT, UPDATE and/or DELETES).
Sql Server Primary Key Ignore Duplicates
When executing, I want to ignore Duplicate Error statements and continue onto the next statement. What's the best way of doing that? sql sql-server share|improve this question edited Sep 18 '12 at 14:44 GEOCHET 16.4k156085 asked Jul 16 '09 at 17:24 Kingamoon 6371928 add a comment| 12 Answers 12 active oldest votes up vote 12 down vote accepted Although my emphatic advice to you is to structure your sql so as to not attempt duplicate inserts (Philip Kelley's ignore duplicates sql snippet is probably what you need), I want to mention that an error on a statement doesn't necessarily cause a rollback. Unless XACT_ABORT is ON, a transaction will not automatically rollback if an error is encountered unless it's severe enough to kill the connection. XACT_ABORT defaults to OFF. For example, the following sql successfully inserts three values into the table: create table x ( y int not null primary key ) begin transaction insert into x(y) values(1) insert into x(y) values(2) insert into x(y) values(2) insert into x(y) values(3) commit Unless you're setting XACT_ABORT, an error is being raised on the client and causing the rollback. If for some horrible reason you can't avoid inserting duplicates, you ought to be able to trap the error on the client and ignore it. share|improve this answer answered Jul 16 '09 at 18:08 zinglon 1,6501113 add a comment| up vote 49 down vote I think you are looking for the IGNORE_DUP_KEY option on your index. Have a look at IGNORE_DUP_KEY ON option documented at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186869.aspx which causes duplicate insertion attempts to produce a warning instead of an error. share|improve this answer edited Sep 18 '14 at 0:55 answered Jul 16 '09 at 17:41 Canoehead 1,96741838 3 Bad idea - you do not want duplicate data in a unique index. –Jonathan Leffler Jul 16 '09 at 17:45 25 @Jonathan Leffler: IGNORE_DUP_KEY won't cause duplicate data
(Русский)ישראל (עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeLibraryLearnDownloadsTroubleshootingCommunityForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: Clear/Ignore @@error in script file? SQL Server > Transact-SQL Question 0 Sign in to vote
Duplicate Key Was Ignored Sql Server
Is there a way to clear or ignore errors so that a script file
Sql Ignore Error And Continue
will continue to run in 2000 T-SQL?I.E. something like this but compatible with 2000:BEGIN TRYALTER TABLE dbo.SomeTable DROP CONSTRAINT FK_SomeTable_IDEND sql server on duplicate key update TRYBEGIN CATCH--ignore, do nothingEND CATCH--continue doing other things Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:46 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Probably you might need to set XACT_ABORT to OFF as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1139050/how-to-ignore-duplicate-key-error-in-t-sql-sql-server mentioned here:http://doc.ddart.net/mssql/sql70/set-set_40.htmHere is an additional reference: http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-II.html Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:04 AM Reply | Quote Moderator All replies 0 Sign in to vote @@ERROR is the primary way to detect errors in 2000 Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:52 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote SQL-PRO wrote: @@ERROR is the primary way to detect errors in 2000Thanks for the reply, but I didn't https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/d7a26d1d-360d-4423-9382-6cde410ab2ed/clearignore-error-in-script-file?forum=transactsql ask about detecting errors... I already know that I can do "If @@error <> 0"I want to ignore the error and allow the script to continue to run. Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:44 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Probably you might need to set XACT_ABORT to OFF as mentioned here:http://doc.ddart.net/mssql/sql70/set-set_40.htmHere is an additional reference: http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-II.html Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:04 AM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote Thanks Jacob. That XACT_ABORT page is the kind of thing I was looking for. Hopefully it will work out for me. I had actually skimmed over that other article searching around and that didn't jump out at me. Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:53 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote It depends on the error. Some errors will never be caught by TRY/CATCH or @@ERROR and simply cause the "batch" to terminate. You have no control over it and can do NOTHING about it.As I have said many, many, many times, this is a HUGE failing of SQL server and needs to be fixed. Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:52 PM Reply | Quote Moderator Microsoft is conducting an online survey to u
We have a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure that raises errors when run. Because of what it is http://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/ignore-sql-server-2000-store-proc-errors-and-still-get-results.2088778/ doing, this is expected. However, we have result sets that are also http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-I.html being returned from the stored procedure. Using either DataAdapter or SqlDataReader, we'd like to be able to execute the stored proc and still get the result sets back. However, exceptions are thrown whenever the stored proc raises an error. Is there any way to ignore or suppress these sql server errors and still get the result sets? Thanks, Mike Mike Jansen, Aug 10, 2005 #1 Advertisements Mike Jansen Guest Looks like I can only do this with ODBC and at that it looks shakey. Any feedback? http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-I.html#ADO.Net Mike Jansen, Aug 10, 2005 #2 Advertisements Mary Chipman [MSFT] Guest Do you have control over the stored procedures? The optimal sql server ignore way to handle server-side errors in this situation would be to NOT use raiserror and instead return the expected @@error values in output parameters instead. That way you can decide in your client-side code whether or not to ignore the output parameter values without triggering an exception. Raising errors and handling exceptions is expensive in both server and client code. --Mary On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:39:30 -0400, "Mike Jansen" <> wrote: >We have a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure that raises errors when run. >Because of what it is doing, this is expected. However, we have result sets >that are also being returned from the stored procedure. > >Using either DataAdapter or SqlDataReader, we'd like to be able to execute >the stored proc and still get the result sets back. However, exceptions are >thrown whenever the stored proc raises an error. Is there any way to ignore >or suppress these errors and still get the result sets? > >Thanks, >Mike > Mary Chipman [MSFT], Aug 10, 2005 #3 Mike Jansen Guest I'm not calling RAISERROR. Errors
some extent ADO - behave when an error occurs. The other article, Implementing Error Handling with Stored Procedures, gives advice for how you should check for errors when you write stored procedures. Logically, this article is part one, and Implementing... is part two. However, you can read the articles in any order, and if you are relatively new to SQL Server, I recommend that you start with Implementing.... The article here gives a deeper background and may answer more advanced users' questions about error handling in SQL Server. Note: this article was written for SQL2000 and earlier versions. All I have for SQL 2005 is unfinished article with a section Jumpstart Error Handling. The content in this article is to some extent applicable to SQL 2005 as well, but you will have to use your imagination to map what I say to SQL 2005. The article includes a short section on TRY-CATCH. I hope to produce a complete article for error handling in SQL 2005 later on. Table of Contents: Introduction The Basics The Anatomy of an Error Message How to Detect an Error in T-SQL - @@error Return Values from Stored Procedures @@rowcount @@trancount More on Severity Levels What Happens when an Error Occurs? The Possible Actions When Does SQL Server Take which Action? Connection-termination Scope-abortion Statement-termination and Batch-abortion Trigger Context Errors in User-Defined Functions Control Over Error Handling SET XACT_ABORT ARITHABORT, ARITHIGNORE and ANSI_WARNINGS RAISERROR WITH NOWAIT Duplicates Using Linked Servers Retrieving the Text of an Error Message TRY-CATCH in SQL2005 Client-side Error Handling DB-Library ODBC ADO ADO .Net Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction In many aspects SQL Server is a very good DBMS that permits you implement powerful solutions with good performance. However, when it comes to error handling... To be blunt: error handling in SQL Server is poor. It is a patchwork of not-always-so-consistent behaviour. It's also weak in that you have fairly little control over error handling, and for advanced error handling like suppressing errors or logging errors, you must take help from the client-side