Ms Sql Server Error 258
Contents |
(Русский)ישראל (עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeLibraryLearnDownloadsTroubleshootingCommunityForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: [SQL Native Client]TCP Provider: Timeout error sql server 2014 error 258 [258] SQL Server > SQL Server Data Access Question 0 Sign [298] sqlserver error: 258, tcp provider: timeout error [258]. [sqlstate 08001] in to vote Hi Users complain that when their jobs connect to SQL Server, they get below microsoft sql server 2012 error 258 error message. They connect using SSMS or client applications. If they continuously try connecting, it connects without errors.[SQL Native Client]TCP Provider: Timeout error [258].[SQL Native Client]Login timeout expired[SQL Native
Sql Server, Error: 258 Tcp Provider
Client]Unable to complete login process due to delay in loginresponse When I checked error log, I found below messages. 2010-02-24 21:32:00.670 Logon Login failed for user ''. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection. [CLIENT: 111.111.111.10]2010-02-24 21:32:00.820 Logon Error: 17806, Severity: 20, State: 2.2010-02-24 21:32:00.820 Logon SSPI handshake failed with error code 0x80090311 tcp provider timeout error 258 sql server 2008 while establishing a connection with integrated security; the connection has been closed. [CLIENT: 111.111.111.10] Could some one look into this issue and help/suggest?Thanks In AdvanceVickyThanks Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:00 AM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Dan Thanks for your reply. The above mentioned resolution was work around and now its been permanently fixed by Modifying hosts file for the problem server to have static entry to their domain controllers. I am not sure on what was the actual issue.ThanksThanks Marked as answer by Vicky Winner Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:54 AM Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:53 AM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote That error code, 0x80090311, is SEC_E_NO_AUTHENTICATING_AUTHORITY, from a Windows component called SSPI. Per their documentation here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa374705(VS.85).aspx), it means: "The function failed. No authority could be contacted for authentication. This could be due to the following conditions: The domain name of the authenticating party is incorrect. The domain is unavailable. The trust relationship has failed." If I'm
process due to delay in prelogin response/ Pre-Login HandshakeFailed September 1, 2015 by Sameer Possible Root Cause: Unstable Network connectivity to database unable to complete login process due to delay in prelogin response login timeout expired server or problems with a server in the route Steps
[382] Logon To Server '(local)' Failed (connupdatestartexecutiondate)
Taken To Confirm Root Cause: Setup traceroute at regular intervals using the batch file below @ECHO OFF
Unable To Complete Login Process Due To Delay In Prelogin Response 2008
set SERVER=DBServerName.domainname.com set INTERVAL=60 :TRACEINTERVAL tracert %SERVER% >> C:\DBServerNametracert.txt timeout %INTERVAL% GOTO TRACEINTERVAL In my case, no issues were found, was able to connect to DBServerName continously. https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/00b93d44-b497-4367-a3cf-99dfd42f0f66/sql-native-clienttcp-provider-timeout-error-258?forum=sqldataaccess This would indicate there are no network connectivity issues. Possible Root Cause: Issues connecting to Active Directory Server Steps Taken To Confirm Root Cause: Tried connecting via a SQL id using SSMS & SQLCMD encountered the same issue. Possible Root Cause: DNS Problems Steps Taken To Confirm Root Cause: Tried connecting via IP, still encountered the same issue Possible https://samzsimplesql.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/troubleshooting-connectivity-issues-timeout-error-258-unable-to-complete-login-process-due-to-delay-in-prelogin-response-pre-login-handshake-failed-2/ Root Cause: Issues connectiving via IPv4 or IPv6 address Steps Taken To Confirm Root Cause: Checked TCP/IP properties in configuration manager on database server; server was listening to all IP's. Tried connecting manually using the IPv4 addresses as well as IPv6 addresses; Encountered the same error in both, so issue was not related to this cause. C:\Users\sameer\Desktop>sqlcmd -S DBServerName.domainname.com -E Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : TCP Provider: Timeout error [258]. Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : Login timeout expired. Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : Unable to complete login process due to delay in prelogin response. C:\Users\sameer\Desktop>sqlcmd -S fe40::d0f8:6600:8b2:625b%14 -E Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : Named Pipes Provider: Could not open a connection to SQL Server [53]. . Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : Login timeout expired. Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0 : A network-related or instance-specific error has occurred while establishing
Amazon Amazon Web Services ( AWS ) Relational Data Services ( RDS ) Hadoop Informatica Java Linux Microsoft .Net Internet Information Server (IIS) MS SQL Server Reporting Services Transact SQL MS Windows PowerShell https://danieladeniji.wordpress.com/tag/tcp-provider-timeout-error-258/ Win OS MySQL NetApp Quest HomePosts tagged 'TCP Provider: Timeout error [258]' http://serverfault.com/questions/173909/sql-2008-not-accepting-connections TCP Provider: Timeout error [258] SQL Server - Concurrent DML (Insert/Update) - UPSERT vs MergeStatement June 14, 2014October 31, 2015 Daniel Adeniji Merge, Microsoft, MS SQL Server, Statements, Technical, Transact SQL, UPSERT Login timeout expired, Login/Query timeout: 15/0 seconds, TCP Provider: Timeout error [258] Background I found myself reading Jamie Thomson's ( http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson sql server ) blog postings. And, from there somehow ended up reading Dan Guzman's blog posting - Conditional INSERT/UPDATE Race Condition ( http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/dang/archive/2007/10/28.aspx ). Introduction Dan Guzman suggested the use of UPDLOCK and HOLDLOCK when implementing UPSERT statements. The basic premise is that when checking whether the record exists or not, one should use the UPDLOCK and HOLDLOCK table hints. The use of these locks ensures "Serializable" reads. unable to complete Please read more here - Isolation Levels in the Database Engine - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189122(v=sql.105).aspx Here is how Microsoft defines these locks: Table Hints (Transact-SQL) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187373.aspx HOLDLOCK Is equivalent to SERIALIZABLE. For more information, see SERIALIZABLE later in this topic. HOLDLOCK applies only to the table or view for which it is specified and only for the duration of the transaction defined by the statement that it is used in. SERIALIZABLE Is equivalent to HOLDLOCK. Makes shared locks more restrictive by holding them until a transaction is completed, instead of releasing the shared lock as soon as the required table or data page is no longer needed, whether the transaction has been completed or not. The scan is performed with the same semantics as a transaction running at the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. UPDLOCK Specifies that update locks are to be taken and held until the transaction completes. UPDLOCK takes update locks for read operations only at the row-level or page-level. Refresher As a refresher, one needs to be quite thoughtful when deciding which Isolation level one wants to choose in your Application Development strategy. As always, Wikipedia has through definitions: Isolation (database systems) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolation_(database
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top SQL 2008 not accepting connections up vote 2 down vote favorite 1 Setup: SQL 2008 Standard SP1 64Bit on Windows 2008 - one CPU, 8GB of memory The server is dedicated to SQL Server. The server memory settings were as default (min 0 max 2000GB) Connections from 8 websites and services - the services frequently checking for new tasks 8 databases approx 1GB to 5GB each Recently upgraded from SQL 2000 on Windows 2003 Issue: Recently got all the databases transferred over, and at times of heavy load overnight - especially when running CHECKDB - the server will stop allowing new connections with error messages detailed below. SQL Backups continued to work during this time. Rebooting the server gets us back up again. I can work on moving jobs around and performance tuning to try and avoid overload/usage peaks, but the server will only get busier over time. The services are using resource/connection pooling, and the load overnight is mostly index rebuilds, archiving & checkdb Question: So, is there a way to handle the 'overload/wont accept new connections' gracefully or prevent it from happening? Does anyone have a handle on what might be happening here? If the server gets overloaded and wont accept new connections, is the only solution to reboot? Error Messages: on the Website: Unspecified erro