Ms Sql Transaction Error
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or sql server error_message posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss sql server error handling Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only sql server stored procedure error handling best practices takes a minute: Sign up SQL Server - transactions roll back on error? up vote 103 down vote favorite 31 We have client app that is running some SQL on a SQL Server 2005 such as the following: BEGIN TRAN; error handling in sql server 2012 INSERT INTO myTable (myColumns ...) VALUES (myValues ...); INSERT INTO myTable (myColumns ...) VALUES (myValues ...); INSERT INTO myTable (myColumns ...) VALUES (myValues ...); COMMIT TRAN; It is sent by one long string command. If one of the inserts fail, or any part of the command fails, does SQL Server roll back the transaction? If it does not rollback, do I have to send a second command to roll it back? I can give specifics about the api and language I'm
Sql Server Try Catch Transaction
using, but I would think SQL Server should respond the same for any language. sql sql-server sql-server-2005 transactions share|improve this question edited Nov 17 '09 at 16:10 marc_s 454k938701033 asked Nov 17 '09 at 15:38 jonathanpeppers 14.9k1473157 stackoverflow.com/questions/1150032/… –zloctb Jul 7 '15 at 16:55 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 119 down vote accepted You can put set xact_abort on before your transaction to make sure sql rolls back automatically in case of error. share|improve this answer edited Mar 28 '12 at 21:37 Greg B 8,4341356106 answered Nov 17 '09 at 15:47 DyingCactus 23.8k24138 1 Will this work on MS SQL 2K and higher? This seems the most simple solution. –jonathanpeppers Nov 17 '09 at 15:49 1 It appears in the docs for 2000, 2005, and 2008 so I assume yes. We are using it in 2008. –DyingCactus Nov 17 '09 at 15:54 5 Do I need to turn it off or is it per session? –Marc Sep 3 '12 at 15:52 1 For this particular case it works, but XACT_ABORT is not a cure for all disease. The following will fail SET XACT_ABORT ON EXEC sp_executesql N'some eroneus statement' SELECT 'Shouldn''t see this' –jaraics Oct 5 '12 at 7:44 11 in some cases "set xact_abort on" doesn't rollback whole transaction, you need to use TRY to CATCH and ROLLBACK for those cases. For example inserting into two
Microsoft Tech Companion App Microsoft Technical Communities Microsoft Virtual Academy Script Center Server
Set Xact_abort
and Tools Blogs TechNet Blogs TechNet Flash Newsletter try catch in sql server stored procedure TechNet Gallery TechNet Library TechNet Magazine TechNet Subscriptions TechNet Video TechNet Wiki Windows Sysinternals sql try catch throw Virtual Labs Solutions Networking Cloud and Datacenter Security Virtualization Downloads Updates Service Packs Security Bulletins Windows Update Trials Windows Server 2016 System http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1749719/sql-server-transactions-roll-back-on-error Center 2016 Windows 10 Enterprise SQL Server 2016 See all trials » Related Sites Microsoft Download Center TechNet Evaluation Center Drivers Windows Sysinternals TechNet Gallery Training Training Expert-led, virtual classes Training Catalog Class Locator Microsoft Virtual Academy Free Windows Server 2012 courses Free Windows 8 courses https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179296(v=sql.105).aspx SQL Server training Microsoft Official Courses On-Demand Certifications Certification overview MCSA: Windows 10 Windows Server Certification (MCSE) Private Cloud Certification (MCSE) SQL Server Certification (MCSE) Other resources TechNet Events Second shot for certification Born To Learn blog Find technical communities in your area Support Support options For business For developers For IT professionals For technical support Support offerings More support Microsoft Premier Online TechNet Forums MSDN Forums Security Bulletins & Advisories Not an IT pro? Microsoft Customer Support Microsoft Community Forums United States (English) Sign in Home Library Wiki Learn Gallery Downloads Support Forums Blogs We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Accessing and Changing Database Data Procedural Transact-SQL Handling Database Engine Errors Handling Database Engine Errors Using TRY...CATCH in Transact-SQL Using TRY...CATCH in Transact-SQL Usi
Errors in SQL Server 2012 03 January 2013Handling Errors in SQL Server 2012The error handling of SQL Server has always been somewhat mysterious. Now at last, the THROW statement has been included in SQL Server https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/handling-errors-in-sql-server-2012/ 2012 that, combined with the TRY ... CATCH block, makes error handling far easier. Robert Sheldon explains all. 195 14 Robert Sheldon Since the release of SQL Server 2005, you've been able to handle errors in your T-SQL code by including a TRY…CATCH block that controls the flow of your script should an error occur, similar to how procedural languages have traditionally handled errors. The TRY…CATCH block makes it easy to return or audit error-related sql server data, as well as take other actions. And within the block-specifically, the CATCH portion-you've been able to include a RAISERROR statement in order to re-throw error-related data to the calling application. However, with the release of SQL Server 2012, you now have a replacement for RAISERROR, the THROW statement, which makes it easier than ever to capture the error-related data. In this article, we'll look at the TRY…CATCH block used with both the RAISERROR and THROW sql server error statements. The examples are based on a table I created in the AdventureWorks2012 sample database, on a local instance of SQL Server 2012. Listing 1 shows the T-SQL script I used to create the LastYearSales table. 123456789101112131415161718 USE AdventureWorks2012;GOIF OBJECT_ID('LastYearSales', 'U') IS NOT NULLDROP TABLE LastYearSales;GOSELECTBusinessEntityID AS SalesPersonID,FirstName + ' ' + LastName AS FullName,SalesLastYearINTOLastYearSalesFROMSales.vSalesPersonWHERESalesLastYear > 0;GO Listing 1: Creating the LastYearSales table The script should be fairly straightforward. I use a SELECT…INTO statement to retrieve data from the Sales.vSalesPerson view and insert it into the newly created table. However, to demonstrate how to handle errors, we need to add one more element to our table: a check constraint that ensures the SalesLastYear value is never less than zero. Listing 2 shows the ALTERTABLE statement I used to add the constraint. 123 ALTER TABLE LastYearSalesADD CONSTRAINT ckSalesTotal CHECK (SalesLastYear >= 0);GO Listing 2: Adding a check constraint to the LastYearSales table The constraint makes it easy to generate an error when updating the table. All I have to do is try to add a negative amount to the SalesLastYear column, an amount large enough to cause SQL Server to throw an error. Once we've created our table and added the check constraint, we have the environment we need for the examples in this article. You can just as easily come up with your own table a