On Error Sql
Contents |
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference Dev centers sql server error_message Samples Retired content We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll
Sql Server Stored Procedure Error Handling Best Practices
be auto redirected in 1 second. Microsoft SQL Server Language Reference Transact-SQL Reference (Database Engine) Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL) Control-of-Flow
Error Handling In Sql Server 2012
Language (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) BEGIN...END (Transact-SQL) BREAK (Transact-SQL) CONTINUE (Transact-SQL) ELSE (IF...ELSE) (Transact-SQL) END (BEGIN...END) (Transact-SQL) GOTO (Transact-SQL) IF...ELSE (Transact-SQL) RETURN (Transact-SQL) THROW (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) WAITFOR (Transact-SQL)
Sql Server Try Catch Transaction
WHILE (Transact-SQL) TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) Other Versions SQL Server 2012 THIS TOPIC APPLIES TO: SQL Server (starting with 2008)Azure SQL DatabaseAzure SQL Data Warehouse Parallel Data Warehouse Implements error handling for Transact-SQL that is similar to the try catch in sql server stored procedure exception handling in the Microsoft Visual C# and Microsoft Visual C++ languages. A group of Transact-SQL statements can be enclosed in a TRY block. If an error occurs in the TRY block, control is passed to another group of statements that is enclosed in a CATCH block. Transact-SQL Syntax ConventionsSyntax Copy -- Syntax for SQL Server, Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, Parallel Data Warehouse BEGIN TRY { sql_statement | statement_block } END TRY BEGIN CATCH [ { sql_statement | statement_block } ] END CATCH [ ; ] Argumentssql_statement Is any Transact-SQL statement.statement_block Any group of Transact-SQL statements in a batch or enclosed in a BEGIN…END block.RemarksA TRY…CATCH construct catches all execution errors that have a severity higher than 10 that do not close the database connection.A TRY block must be immediately followed by an associated CATCH block. Including any other statements between the END TRY and BEGIN CATCH statements generates a syntax error.A TRY…CATCH construct cannot span multiple batches. A TRY…CATCH construct cannot span multiple blocks of Transact-SQL statements. For example, a TRY…CATCH construct cannot span two BEGIN…END blocks of Transact-SQL statements and cannot span an IF…ELSE construct.If there
Microsoft Tech Companion App Microsoft Technical Communities Microsoft Virtual Academy Script Center Server and Tools Blogs TechNet Blogs TechNet Flash Newsletter TechNet Gallery TechNet Library TechNet Magazine TechNet Subscriptions TechNet Video TechNet Wiki Windows Sysinternals Virtual Labs sql try catch throw Solutions Networking Cloud and Datacenter Security Virtualization Downloads Updates Service Packs Security Bulletins Windows sql throw error Update Trials Windows Server 2016 System Center 2016 Windows 10 Enterprise SQL Server 2016 See all trials » Related Sites Microsoft sql @@trancount Download Center TechNet Evaluation Center Drivers Windows Sysinternals TechNet Gallery Training Training Expert-led, virtual classes Training Catalog Class Locator Microsoft Virtual Academy Free Windows Server 2012 courses Free Windows 8 courses SQL Server training Microsoft https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175976.aspx Official Courses On-Demand Certifications Certification overview MCSA: Windows 10 Windows Server Certification (MCSE) Private Cloud Certification (MCSE) SQL Server Certification (MCSE) Other resources TechNet Events Second shot for certification Born To Learn blog Find technical communities in your area Support Support options For business For developers For IT professionals For technical support Support offerings More support Microsoft Premier Online TechNet Forums MSDN Forums Security Bulletins & Advisories Not an IT pro? https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa175920(v=sql.80).aspx Microsoft Customer Support Microsoft Community Forums United States (English) Sign in Home Library Wiki Learn Gallery Downloads Support Forums Blogs We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Periodicals Microsoft SQL Server Professional June 2000 June 2000 Error Handling in T-SQL: From Casual to Religious Error Handling in T-SQL: From Casual to Religious Error Handling in T-SQL: From Casual to Religious Error Handling in T-SQL: From Casual to Religious TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This article may contain URLs that were valid when originally published, but now link to sites or pages that no longer exist. To maintain the flow of the article, we've left these URLs in the text, but disabled the links. SQL Server 2000 Error Handling in T-SQL: From Casual to Religious Dejan Sunderic Most of us would agree that experienced programmers tend to be more adept at (and perhaps even more "religious" about) error handling than rookies. VB and C/C++ programmers are so spoiled by the error-handling tools in their IDEs that they sometimes forget good old-fashioned "roll your own" error handling. I
how you should implement error handling when you write stored procedures, including when you call them from ADO. The other article, Error Handling in SQL Server - a Background, gives a deeper description of the idiosyncrasies with http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-II.html error handling in SQL Server and ADO. That article is in some sense part one http://stackoverflow.com/questions/725891/what-is-the-best-practice-use-of-sql-server-t-sql-error-handling in the series. However, you can read this article without reading the background article first, and if you are not a very experienced user of SQL Server, I recommend you to start here. In places there are links to the background article, if you want more information about a certain issue. Note: this article is aimed at SQL2000 and sql server earlier versions of SQL Server. SQL2005 offers significantly improved methods for error handling with TRY-CATCH. This article is not apt if you are using SQL 2005 or later. I don't have a complete article on error handling for SQL 2005, but I have an unfinished article with a section Jumpstart Error Handling that still can be useful. Table of Contents: Introduction The Presumptions A General Example Checking Calls to Stored Procedures The Philosophy of Error sql server stored Handling General Requirements Why Do We Check for Errors? When Should You Check @@error? ROLLBACK or not to ROLLBACK - That's the Question SET XACT_ABORT ON revisited Error Handling with Cursors Error Handling with Triggers Error Handling with User-Defined Functions Error Handling with Dynamic SQL Error Handling in Client Code What to Do in Case of an Error? Command Timeouts Why is My Error Not Raised? Getting the Return Value from a Stored Procedure Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction Error handling in stored procedures is a very tedious task, because T-SQL offers no exception mechanism, or any On Error Goto. All you have is the global variable @@error which you need to check after each statement for a non-zero value to be perfectly safe. If you call a stored procedure, you also need to check the return value from the procedure. In fact, this is so extremely tedious, so you will find that you will have to make compromises and in some situations assume that nothing can go wrong. Still, you cannot just ignore checking for errors, because ignoring an error could cause your updates to be incomplete, and compromise the integrity of your data. Or it can cause a transaction to run for much longer time than intended, leading to blocking and risk that the user loses all his upd
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up What is the best practice use of SQL Server T-SQL error handling? up vote 20 down vote favorite 12 We have a large application mainly written in SQL Server 7.0, where all database calls are to stored procedures. We are now running SQL Server 2005, which offers more T-SQL features. After just about every SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE, the @@ROWCOUNT and @@ERROR get captured into local variables and evaluated for problems. If there is a problem the following is done: error message output parameter is set rollback (if necessary) is done info is written (INSERT) to log table return with a error number, unique to this procedure (positive if fatal, negative is warning) They all don't check the rows (only when it is known) and some differ with more or less log/debug info. Also, the rows logic is somethimes split from the error logic (on updates where a concurrency field is checked in the WHERE clause, rows=0 means someone else has updated the data). However, here is a fairly generic example: SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE SELECT @Error=@@ERROR, @Rows=@@ROWCOUNT IF @Rows!=1 OR @Error!=0 BEGIN SET @ErrorMsg='ERROR 20, ' + ISNULL(OBJECT_NAME(@@PROCID), 'unknown') + ' - unable to ???????? the ????.' IF @@TRANCOUNT >0 BEGIN ROLLBACK END SET @LogInfo=ISNULL(@LogInfo,'')+'; '+ISNULL(@ErrorMsg,'')+ + ' @YYYYY=' +dbo.FormatString(@YYYYY) +', @XXXXX=' +