Kernel Flags Error 5
Contents |
[x] Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Last Comment First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your xfs xfs_log_force error 5 returned last search results. Bug1211084 - [XFS] kernel: XFS (dm-0): xfs_log_force: error -5
Linux Xfs_log_force Error 5 Returned
returned [NEEDINFO] Summary: [XFS] kernel: XFS (dm-0): xfs_log_force: error -5 returned Status: CLOSED EOL Aliases: None Product: Fedora
Xfs Error 5
Classification: Fedora Component: kernel (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Version: 20 Hardware: x86_64 Linux Priority unspecified Severity high TargetMilestone: --- TargetRelease: --- Assigned To: fs-maint QA Contact: Fedora Extras
Ubuntu Xfs_log_force Error 5 Returned
Quality Assurance Docs Contact: URL: Whiteboard: Keywords: Depends On: Blocks: Show dependency tree /graph Reported: 2015-04-12 17:23 EDT by Cristian Ciupitu Modified: 2015-06-29 20:20 EDT (History) CC List: 9 users (show) cristian.ciupitu esandeen fedora-kernel-xfs gansalmon itamar jonathan kernel-maint madhu.chinakonda mchehab See Also: Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix Doc Text: Story Points: --- Clone Of: Environment: Last Closed: xfs_log_force error 5 returned redhat 2015-06-29 20:20:30 EDT Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- CRM: Verified Versions: Category: --- oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: Cloudforms Team: --- Flags: kernel-team: needinfo? Attachments (Terms of Use) Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) Groups: None (edit) Description Cristian Ciupitu 2015-04-12 17:23:45 EDT Description of problem: I encountered an error on an XFS partition while the partition was mounted. I umounted it and run `xfs_repair -n` on it. If it matters, the partition has very little free space on it (a couple of MBs) and I've had to remove or hardlink a couple of files during the last week because it kept filling up with new files. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-3.19.3-100.fc20.x86_64 How reproducible: Only once. Steps to Reproduce: I have no idea. Actual results: kernel: XFS (dm-0): xfs_log_force: error -5 returned Also: # xfs_repair -n /dev/mapper/oldHermesVG-homeVol Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... Phase 2 - using internal log - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... sb_ifree 185804, counted 185877 sb_fdblocks 8399, counted 24 - found ro
X, Video Our friend StingRay has been hard at work illustrating the basics of Hackintoshing through a series of helpful learning videos. These next two focus on troubleshooting your system. The xfs_log_force error 5 returned openstack first explains some of the causes and solutions to certain system crashes, or xfs: internal error xfs_want_corrupted_goto kernel panics. The other is an introduction to the uses of bootloader flags. Produced and narrated by StingRay. Related xfs_log_force error 5 returned iscsi Posts: All tonymacx86 Video Hackintosh Under the Hood: Post-Installation System Overview UniBeast: Install Mac OS X Lion Using an All-In-One Bootable USB Drive Building a Sandy Bridge CustoMac: Buyer's Guide For discussions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211084 on this and other topics, register today at tonymacx86.com! Newer Post Older Post Home Click here to buy us a cup of coffee... THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT!It helps us continue to do what we do. UniBeast Mountain Lion Guide UniBeast Lion Guide iBoot + MultiBeast Snow Leopard Guide ► 2013 (1) ► February (1) ▼ 2012 (45) ► August (1) ► July (5) ► http://tonymacx86.blogspot.com/2012/01/hackintosh-basics-kernel-panics-boot.html June (7) ► May (11) ► April (3) ► March (6) ► February (7) ▼ January (5) Hackintosh Basics: Kernel Panics & Boot Flags Hackintosh Under the Hood: Post-Installation Syste... tonymacx86 Public Service Announcement: Dual Booti... New Optimized Audio Drivers for Onboard Realtek AL... DSDT Database Update - Gigabyte Sandy Bridge Socke... ► 2011 (76) ► December (6) ► November (3) ► October (8) ► September (9) ► August (6) ► July (5) ► June (5) ► May (8) ► April (7) ► March (8) ► February (3) ► January (8) ► 2010 (50) ► December (4) ► November (7) ► October (3) ► September (4) ► August (4) ► July (5) ► June (5) ► May (2) ► April (2) ► March (4) ► February (4) ► January (6) ► 2009 (24) ► December (10) ► November (14) iBoot + MultiBeast: Install Mac OS X on any Intel-based PC Any OSx86 installation guide can seem daunting at first glance, especially when trying to remember cryptic terminal commands and sorting ... UniBeast: Install Mac OS X Lion Using an All-In-One Bootable USB Drive Introducing UniBeast- our new tool to create a bootable U
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25533827/registry-key-for-global-flags-gflags site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x http://vulnfactory.org/blog/2013/02/06/a-linux-memory-trick/ Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Registry key error 5 for Global Flags (gflags) up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm currently having an error while trying to remove the flag "Enable heap tagging by DLL" with the debug tool GFlags for so-called "image": the application I was debugging. I get an "Unable to save the registry error 5". However there are no problem for other "Enable heap..." flags, they can be toggled on xfs_log_force error 5 and off. I tried to launch the utility as Administrator but that doesn't change anything. So I am trying to figure out what registry settings should I manually change to put things back to normal, however I do not seem to find the correct registry key about Windows Global Flags. Or I could simply remove any global flag related to my application. Any idea ? I tried to find FLG_HEAP_PAGE_ALLOCS in the registry, which is the symbolic name of the more general flag "Enable page heap" as said here in MSDN. But without success. registry sysinternals gflags share|improve this question edited Aug 27 '14 at 18:04 asked Aug 27 '14 at 17:46 Stephane Rolland 14.3k2175119 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted Delete the keys : [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\RADAR\HeapLeakDetection\DiagnosedApplications\MyApplication.exe] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\MyApplication.exe] Beware that it will also remove debugging configurations made with/for Application Verifier. Secondly, maybe it's related, but on MSDN regarding gflags: "Note: Incorrect use of this tool can degrade system performance or prevent Windows from starting, requiring you to reinstall Windows. Important: Pool tagging is permanently enabled on Windows Serv
to determine from an unprivileged process whether an address residing within the kernel address space is mapped or unmapped. The top-level page fault handler on x86 is do_page_fault(), found in arch/x86/mm/fault.c. When the CPU fires a page fault exception, it pushes an error code onto the stack, which is accessible as an argument to the page fault handler. When a userland process attempts to access unmapped memory or memory whose page permissions do not allow the desired type of access, the following code path is invoked:
do_page_fault()
__do_page_fault()
bad_area_nosemaphore()
__bad_area_nosemaphore()
show_signal_msg()
This last function prints a message to the kernel syslog with information about the uncaught SIGSEGV that is thrown as a result of the invalid memory access: static inline void show_signal_msg(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk) { if (!unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV)) return; if (!printk_ratelimit()) return; printk("%s%s[%d]: segfault at %lx ip %p sp %p error %lx", task_pid_nr(tsk) > 1 ? KERN_INFO : KERN_EMERG, tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), address, (void *)regs->ip, (void *)regs->sp, error_code); print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip); printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); } Note that the error_code printed to the syslog has been passed down all the way from the top-level page fault handler. It's worth taking a look at what the bits of this error code correspond to. Most importantly, bit 0 is the Present flag, indicating whether or not the page the process was trying to access is present at all. Bit 1 is the Read/Write flag, indicating whether this was a read or write fault, and bit 2 is the User/Supervisor flag, which is 0 when the fault was caused by a supervisory process, and 1 if the fault was caused by a user process. In other words, regardless of whether the attempted access resides in user or kernel space, the error code logged to the syslog indicates whether the address corresponds to a present o