Error C Function
Contents |
C - Basic Syntax C - Data Types C - Variables C - Constants C - Storage Classes C - Operators C - Decision Making C - Loops C - Functions C - Scope Rules C - Arrays C - Pointers C - inverse error function c Strings C - Structures C - Unions C - Bit Fields C - Typedef C error declaration of c function - Input & Output C - File I/O C - Preprocessors C - Header Files C - Type Casting C - Error Handling C
C Error Function Declared Implicitly
- Recursion C - Variable Arguments C - Memory Management C - Command Line Arguments C Programming Resources C - Questions & Answers C - Quick Guide C - Useful Resources C - Discussion Selected Reading Developer's Best Practices Questions
Gaussian Error Function Calculator
and Answers Effective Resume Writing HR Interview Questions Computer Glossary Who is Who C - Error Handling Advertisements Previous Page Next Page As such, C programming does not provide direct support for error handling but being a system programming language, it provides you access at lower level in the form of return values. Most of the C or even Unix function calls return -1 or NULL in case of any error and set an error code errno. It is print error c set as a global variable and indicates an error occurred during any function call. You can find various error codes defined in
C - Basic Syntax C - Data Types C - Variables C - Constants C - Storage Classes C - Operators C - Decision Making C - Loops C - Functions C - Scope Rules C -
C Error Handling Best Practices
Arrays C - Pointers C - Strings C - Structures C - Unions C - error.h c Bit Fields C - Typedef C - Input & Output C - File I/O C - Preprocessors C - Header Files C c error codes - Type Casting C - Error Handling C - Recursion C - Variable Arguments C - Memory Management C - Command Line Arguments C Programming Resources C - Questions & Answers C - Quick Guide C - https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cprogramming/c_error_handling.htm Useful Resources C - Discussion Selected Reading Developer's Best Practices Questions and Answers Effective Resume Writing HR Interview Questions Computer Glossary Who is Who C - Error Handling Advertisements Previous Page Next Page As such, C programming does not provide direct support for error handling but being a system programming language, it provides you access at lower level in the form of return values. Most of the C or even Unix function calls https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cprogramming/c_error_handling.htm return -1 or NULL in case of any error and set an error code errno. It is set as a global variable and indicates an error occurred during any function call. You can find various error codes defined in
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers http://stackoverflow.com/questions/385975/error-handling-in-c-code or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error handling in C code up vote 102 down vote favorite 59 What do you consider "best practice" when it comes to error handling errors in a consistent way in a C library. error c There are two ways I've been thinking of: Always return error code. A typical function would look like this: MYAPI_ERROR getObjectSize(MYAPIHandle h, int* returnedSize); The always provide an error pointer approach: int getObjectSize(MYAPIHandle h, MYAPI_ERROR* returnedError); When using the first approach it's possible to write code like this where the error handling check is directly placed on the function call: int size; if(getObjectSize(h, &size) != MYAPI_SUCCESS) { // Error handling } Which looks better than the error handling code here. error function c MYAPIError error; int size; size = getObjectSize(h, &error); if(error != MYAPI_SUCCESS) { // Error handling } However, I think using the return value for returning data makes the code more readable, It's obvious that something was written to the size variable in the second example. Do you have any ideas on why I should prefer any of those approaches or perhaps mix them or use something else? I'm not a fan of global error states since it tends to make multi threaded use of the library way more painful. EDIT: C++ specific ideas on this would also be interesting to hear about as long as they are not involving exceptions since it's not an option for me at the moment... c error-handling share|improve this question edited Nov 6 '13 at 19:09 ubershmekel 3,64013145 asked Dec 22 '08 at 10:46 Laserallan 6,71172956 add a comment| 17 Answers 17 active oldest votes up vote 50 down vote accepted I like the error as return-value way. If you're designing the api and you want to make use of your library as painless as possible think about these additions: store all possible error-states in one typedef'ed enum and use it in your lib. Don't just return ints or even worse, mix ints or different enumerations with return-codes. provide a function that converts errors into something human readable. Can be simple. Just error-enum in, const char* out. I know this idea makes mu