Causes Error In Measurement
Contents |
assumes that any observation is composed of the true value plus some random error value. But is that reasonable? What if all error is not random? Isn't it possible that some errors are systematic, that they hold across most or all of the members of
Causes Of Measurement Error In Education
a group? One way to deal with this notion is to revise the simple true score factors contributing to measurement error model by dividing the error component into two subcomponents, random error and systematic error. here, we'll look at the differences between these two types
Types Of Measurement Error
of errors and try to diagnose their effects on our research. What is Random Error? Random error is caused by any factors that randomly affect measurement of the variable across the sample. For instance, each person's mood can inflate possible sources of error in measurement or deflate their performance on any occasion. In a particular testing, some children may be feeling in a good mood and others may be depressed. If mood affects their performance on the measure, it may artificially inflate the observed scores for some children and artificially deflate them for others. The important thing about random error is that it does not have any consistent effects across the entire sample. Instead, it pushes observed scores up or down randomly. This means that sources of error in measurement in research if we could see all of the random errors in a distribution they would have to sum to 0 -- there would be as many negative errors as positive ones. The important property of random error is that it adds variability to the data but does not affect average performance for the group. Because of this, random error is sometimes considered noise. What is Systematic Error? Systematic error is caused by any factors that systematically affect measurement of the variable across the sample. For instance, if there is loud traffic going by just outside of a classroom where students are taking a test, this noise is liable to affect all of the children's scores -- in this case, systematically lowering them. Unlike random error, systematic errors tend to be consistently either positive or negative -- because of this, systematic error is sometimes considered to be bias in measurement. Reducing Measurement Error So, how can we reduce measurement errors, random or systematic? One thing you can do is to pilot test your instruments, getting feedback from your respondents regarding how easy or hard the measure was and information about how the testing environment affected their performance. Second, if you are gathering measures using people to collect the data (as interviewers or observers) you should make sure you train them thoroughly so that they aren't inadvertently introducing error. Third, when you collect the data for your study you should dou
have some error associated with them. Anytime data is presented in class, not only in an instrumentation course, it is important they understand the errors associated
Explain The Sources Of Error In Measurement
with that data. Many times these errors are a result of sources of error in measurement lab measurement errors. Even numerical values obtained from models have errors that are, in part, associated with
Different Sources Of Error In Measurement
measurement errors, since observation data is used to initialize the model. Measurement errors generally fall into two categories: random or systematic errors. However even if we know about http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/measerr.php the types of error we still need to know why those errors exist. We can break these into two basic categories: Instrument errors and Operator errors. Random Errors Random errors are ones that are easier to deal with because they cause the measurements to fluctuate around the true value. If we are trying to measure some http://serc.carleton.edu/quantskills/teaching_methods/und_uncertainty/measure_error.html parameter X, greater random errors cause a greater dispersion of values, but the mean of X still represents the true value for that instrument. Systematic Errors A systematic error can be more tricky to track down and is often unknown. This error is often called a bias in the measurement. In chemistry a teacher tells the student to read the volume of liquid in a graduated cylinder by looking at the meniscus. A student may make an error by reading the volume by looking at the liquid level near the edge of the glass. Thus this student will always be off by a certain amount for every reading he makes. This is a systematic error. Instruments often have both systematic and random errors. What Causes Measurement Errors? Now that we know the types of measurement errors that can occur, what factors lead to errors when we take measurements? We can separate this category into 2 basic categories: instrument and operator errors. Human errors are no
The difference between two measurements is called a variation in the measurements. Another word for this variation - or uncertainty in measurement - is "error." This "error" is not the same as a "mistake." It does not mean that http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/algebra/am3/LError.htm you got the wrong answer. The error in measurement is a mathematical way to show the uncertainty in the measurement. It is the difference between the result of the measurement and the true value of what you were measuring. The precision of a measuring instrument is determined by the smallest unit to which it can measure. The precision is said to be the same as the smallest fractional or decimal division on the scale of the measuring instrument. error in Ways of Expressing Error in Measurement: 1. Greatest Possible Error: Because no measurement is exact, measurements are always made to the "nearest something", whether it is stated or not. The greatest possible error when measuring is considered to be one half of that measuring unit. For example, you measure a length to be 3.4 cm. Since the measurement was made to the nearest tenth, the greatest possible error will be half of one tenth, or 0.05. 2. error in measurement Tolerance intervals: Error in measurement may be represented by a tolerance interval (margin of error). Machines used in manufacturing often set tolerance intervals, or ranges in which product measurements will be tolerated or accepted before they are considered flawed. To determine the tolerance interval in a measurement, add and subtract one-half of the precision of the measuring instrument to the measurement. For example, if a measurement made with a metric ruler is 5.6 cm and the ruler has a precision of 0.1 cm, then the tolerance interval in this measurement is 5.6 0.05 cm, or from 5.55 cm to 5.65 cm. Any measurements within this range are "tolerated" or perceived as correct. Accuracy is a measure of how close the result of the measurement comes to the "true", "actual", or "accepted" value. (How close is your answer to the accepted value?) Tolerance is the greatest range of variation that can be allowed. (How much error in the answer is occurring or is acceptable?) 3. Absolute Error and Relative Error: Error in measurement may be represented by the actual amount of error, or by a ratio comparing the error to the size of the measurement. The absolute error of the measurement shows how large the error actually is, while the relative error of the measurement shows how large the error is in relation to the correct value. Absolute errors do not a