Error In Re-setting Breakpoint Not Defined
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Codeblocks “Error resetting breakpoint…” can't debug up vote 1 down vote favorite This is my first post, so feel free to direct me elsewhere if this is in the wrong place. I'm totally new to code::blocks, and I followed the directions (twice) from here to set it up with minGW. Other than some expected warnings, it builds just fine. However, when I go to debug it, I get the following messages: Setting breakpoints Debugger name and version: GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4 Child process PID: 3928 [Inferior 1 (process 3928) exited with code [037777777777] Debugger finished with status 0 When I set a breakpoint, I get the following: Setting breakpoints Debugger name and version: GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4 Child process PID: 3092 Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "C:/Users/Me/Documents/My Code/MyProgram/MyProgram/main.cpp:5" not defined. [Inferior 1 (process 3092) exited with code 037777777777] Debugger finished with status 0 I have searched and searched, but I haven't found anything. The only relevant posts on this site, CodeBlocks Breakpoints Ignoring Scope codeblocks debugging How to debug in Codeblocks?, have not helped me at all. I've reinstalled everything twice and I have no idea what else to do to get this debugger working. Any help at all would be appreciated. EDIT: I made "Hello World!" and it ran, but still could not be debugged. No idea what the problem is, especially since it detects gdb. debugging codeblocks share|improve this question edited May 26 '13 at 5:29 asked May 26 '13 at 4:45 user2421597 64 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote This error occurs if there is a space in your build path (in your case "My Code"). Just rename that directory or move the project to a place where there are no spaces in your path. Reason: Ref this link: http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Debugging_with_Code::Blocks#Path_with_spaces You may have to clean and build your project again share|improve this answer edited Jul 30 '13 at 9:15 answer
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation Social Media Facebook Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Specialised Support Development & Programming Programming Talk [SOLVED] GDB breakpoint problem Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16756301/codeblocks-error-resetting-breakpoint-cant-debug us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Results 1 to 5 of 5 Thread: GDB breakpoint problem Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode February 17th, 2010 #1 EricDallal View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message A Carafe of Ubuntu Join Date Dec 2006 https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1408929 Beans 106 GDB breakpoint problem I am trying to set breakpoints for a C++ program that I compiled with the -g flag. I can set breakpoints by calling break
| Forgot Password Login: [x] Bug9224 - gdb 6.4 prints errors when restarting program with pending breakpoints Summary: gdb 6.4 prints errors when restarting program with pending breakpoints Status: RESOLVED FIXED Alias: None Product: gdb https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Classification: Unclassified Component: breakpoints (show other bugs) Version: 6.4 Importance: P3 normal Target Milestone: --- Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone URL: Keywords: Depends on: Blocks: Reported: 2006-04-22 16:38 UTC by gnu Modified: 2011-08-17 15:27 UTC http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/8724/set-a-breakpoint-on-gdb-entry-point-for-stripped-pie-binaries-without-disabling (History) CC List: 3 users (show) gdb-prs glaw tromey See Also: Host: Target: Build: Last reconfirmed: Attachments Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make error in changes to this bug. Description gnu 2006-04-22 16:38:01 UTC [Converted from Gnats 2119] When restarting a program that has breakpoints pending on library loads that have been resolved, I get error messages telling me that the breakpoint can't be found: Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" error in re-setting not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Function "foo" not defined. I've had a quick look at the source, and the message seems to be coming from decode_variable() The comment for this function says: /* Decode a linespec that's a variable. If FILE_SYMTAB is non-NULL, look in that symtab's static variables first. If NOT_FOUND_PTR is not NULL and the function cannot be found, store boolean true in the location pointed to and do not issue an error message. */ but at the bottom of the function it says: if (not_found_ptr) *not_found_ptr = 1; throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy); I've had a look on 6.3, and it seems here the function code agrees with the comment: if (not_found_ptr) { *not_found_ptr = 1; /* The caller has indicated that it wishes quiet notification of any error where the function or file is not found. A call to error_silent causes an error to occur, but it does not issue the supplied message. The message can be manually output by the caller, if desired. This is used, for example, when attempting to set breakpoints for functions in shared libraries that have not yet been loaded. */ error_silent ("Function \"%s\" not defined.", copy); } Rele
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Reverse Engineering beta Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for researchers and developers who explore the principles of a system through analysis of its structure, function, and operation. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Set a breakpoint on GDB entry point for stripped PIE binaries without disabling ASLR up vote 8 down vote favorite 3 Given a position-independent, statically-linked, stripped binary, there does not appear to be a way in GDB to set a breakpoint at the entry point without disabling ASLR. break start and similar functions do not work, because there is no symbolic information set stop-on-solib-events 1 does not work as the binary is not dynamically linked break *0xdeadbeef for the entry point does not work, as the entry point is unresolved until the binary starts catch load does not work, as it does not load any libraries start does not work, as main is not defined and no libraries are loaded Without patching the binary, what mechanism can I use to break at the first instruction executed? Possible? Since a now-deleted response to the question said that a PIE statically-linked binary is impossible, a trivial example is the linker itself. It is statically linked. $ ldd /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so statically linked It is executable. $ strace /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so execve("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so", ["/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so"], [/* 96 vars */]) = 0 brk(0) = 0x7ff787b3d000 writev(2, [{"Usage: ld.so [OPTION]... EXECUTA"..., 1373}], 1Usage: ld.so [OPTION]... EXECUTABLE-FILE [ARGS-FOR-PROGRAM...] It is position-independent. $ readelf -h /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so | grep DYN Type: DYN (Shared object file) Solutions It looks like this can be done with Python by utilizing some of the events made