Error Propagation Slope
Contents |
uncertainty of an answer obtained from a calculation. Every time data are measured, there is an uncertainty associated with that measurement. (Refer to guide to Measurement and Uncertainty.) If these measurements used how to calculate error in slope in your calculation have some uncertainty associated with them, then the final answer error in slope excel will, of course, have some level of uncertainty. For instance, in lab you might measure an object's position at different error in slope of linear fit times in order to find the object's average velocity. Since both distance and time measurements have uncertainties associated with them, those uncertainties follow the numbers throughout the calculations and eventually affect your final uncertainty of slope linear regression answer for the velocity of that object. How would you determine the uncertainty in your calculated values? In lab, graphs are often used where LoggerPro software calculates uncertainties in slope and intercept values for you. In other classes, like chemistry, there are particular ways to calculate uncertainties. In fact, since uncertainty calculations are based on statistics, there are as many different ways to determine uncertainties as
Standard Deviation Of Slope Excel
there are statistical methods. The error propagation methods presented in this guide are a set of general rules that will be consistently used for all levels of physics classes in this department. In the following examples: q is the result of a mathematical operation δ is the uncertainty associated with a measurement. For example, if you have a measurement that looks like this: m = 20.4 kg ±0.2 kg Thenq = 20.4 kg and δm = 0.2 kg First Step: Make sure that your units are consistent Make sure that you are using SI units and that they are consistent. If you are converting between unit systems, then you are probably multiplying your value by a constant. Please see the following rule on how to use constants. Logger Pro If you are using a curve fit generated by Logger Pro, please use the uncertainty associated with the parameters that Logger Pro give you. In the above linear fit, m = 0.9000 andδm = 0.05774. The uncertainty should be rounded to 0.06, which means that the slope must be rounded to the hundredths place as well: m = 0.90± 0.06 If the above values have units, don
uncertainty of an answer obtained from a calculation. Every time data are measured, there is an uncertainty associated with that measurement. (Refer to guide to Measurement and Uncertainty.) If these measurements used
Slope Uncertainty Calculator
in your calculation have some uncertainty associated with them, then the final answer formula for calculating error in slope will, of course, have some level of uncertainty. For instance, in lab you might measure an object's position at different how to calculate uncertainty from a graph times in order to find the object's average velocity. Since both distance and time measurements have uncertainties associated with them, those uncertainties follow the numbers throughout the calculations and eventually affect your http://physics.appstate.edu/undergraduate-programs/laboratory/resources/error-propagation final answer for the velocity of that object. How would you determine the uncertainty in your calculated values? In lab, graphs are often used where LoggerPro software calculates uncertainties in slope and intercept values for you. In other classes, like chemistry, there are particular ways to calculate uncertainties. In fact, since uncertainty calculations are based on statistics, there are as many different ways to determine uncertainties http://physics.appstate.edu/undergraduate-programs/laboratory/resources/error-propagation as there are statistical methods. The error propagation methods presented in this guide are a set of general rules that will be consistently used for all levels of physics classes in this department. In the following examples: q is the result of a mathematical operation δ is the uncertainty associated with a measurement. For example, if you have a measurement that looks like this: m = 20.4 kg ±0.2 kg Thenq = 20.4 kg and δm = 0.2 kg First Step: Make sure that your units are consistent Make sure that you are using SI units and that they are consistent. If you are converting between unit systems, then you are probably multiplying your value by a constant. Please see the following rule on how to use constants. Logger Pro If you are using a curve fit generated by Logger Pro, please use the uncertainty associated with the parameters that Logger Pro give you. In the above linear fit, m = 0.9000 andδm = 0.05774. The uncertainty should be rounded to 0.06, which means that the slope must be rounded to the hundredths place as well: m = 0.90± 0.06 If the above values have
Community Forums > Physics > General Physics > Dismiss Notice Join Physics Forums Today! The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/uncertainty-propagation-for-the-slope-of-a-line-of-best-fit.595833/ here! Uncertainty Propagation for the Slope of a Line of Best Fit Apr https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_calculate_error_propagation 12, 2012 #1 Kyle91 Hi guys, So I'm writing up a physics lab and I have a bunch of data points. All of these data points have both x and y error bars. The relationship between x and y is linear and so I've made a line of best fit using Python error in passing through the data. Now the slope of that line of best fit has physical significance and I need to know its value. Of course I know the gradient of this line but what I don't have is the uncertainty in this gradient - which I need. How can I go about calculating it? Thanks! Kyle91, Apr 12, 2012 Phys.org - latest science and technology error in slope news stories on Phys.org •Quantum physicist Carl M. Bender wins 2017 Dannie Heineman Prize for Mathematical Physics •A first glimpse into disc shedding in the human eye •X-rays uncover surprising techniques in the creation of art on ancient Greek pottery Apr 12, 2012 #2 mikeph This section should help if you can follow it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_analysis#Linear_regression At the bottom it gives you a pair of formulas for the standard error of the parameter estimates: This works if the errors in the data are uniform. For your work it might be more complicated than that. mikeph, Apr 12, 2012 Apr 12, 2012 #3 Kyle91 Hey thanks for the link! I had a read through but I'm still not fully understanding it. Could you please run me through an example? Lets say I've three data points - (0 +-0.1, 8 +-0.5), (1 +-0.2, 10 +-0.4), (2+-0.3, 12+-0.6) With my line of best fit being y = 2x + 8. Edit: Oh so I only need the second equation you've listed because I only care about the gradient right? Even so I'm still not 100% on how to use it. Kyle91, Apr 12, 2012 Apr 12, 2012
have the formula Y = (A-B)/m where A and B are averages from samples with sizes nA and nB, and m is a "slope" determined from a linear regression from q points. There are standard errors given for A, B and m (sA,sB,sm). I can calculate the standard error of Y by error-propagation as sY = 1/m * sqrt( (sm)²*(A-B)/m² + (sA)² + (sB)² ) Now I want to get a confidence interval for Y, so I need the degrees of freedom for the t-quantile. A rough guess would be nA+nB+q-3. However, somehow I doubt this, because if m would be known theoretically, sY would be simply sqrt ( (sA)²+(sB)² ) with nA+nB-2 d.f. - But when m would be known because q -> Infinity, then sm->0 and sY -> sqrt( (sA)² + (sB)² ) but, following the guess above, with infinitely many d.f. (df = nA + nB + Infinity - 3). Both cannot be correct at the same time. So what is the correct way to get the d.f. and, hence, the confidence interval for Y? (please assume that the errors of A, B and m are all normally distributed; please do not discuss alternatives to or applicabilities and problems of confidence intervals. You may well assume that this is a stupid question, because I may have overlooked some simple fact or made a wrong derivation... this can easily be the case, and I still would be thankful for any help) Thanks! Topics Statistical Inference × 78 Questions 297 Followers Follow Estimation × 409 Questions 232 Followers Follow Confidence Intervals × 178 Questions 59 Followers Follow Error propagation × Topic pending review Follow Statistics × 2,258 Questions 90,555 Followers Follow Apr 1, 2014 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ 1 / 0 All Answers (11) Fabrice Clerot · Orange Labs . if A, B and m can be assumed normal, the distribution of Y is known (and known to be ugly ! see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_distribution ) which leads to a straigtforward numerical computation of the CI but this does not help with these degrees of freedom ! . Apr 1, 2014 Jochen Wilhelm · Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen I can also formulate this question simpler: How do I get the CI of Y? Would it be possible to used the individual CIs in the error propagation directly instead of the standard errors? Apr 2, 2014 Jochen Wilhelm · Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen I did a simulation and found that the usual error propagation for the confidence intervals seems to work (the coverage rate of the propagated 95%CIs is around 0.03-0.06). Is someone of the opinion that this was just a conincidence? Or can someone provide a proof or at least a chain of logical arg