Experimental Error In Spectrophotometry
Contents |
constants depend on the magnitude of systematic and random errors respectively. Good accuracy requires that systematic errors be reduced as far as possible. The use of analytical grade reagents will reduce errors due to sources of error in spectrophotometry purity of reagents such as acid or alkali and the salt used for
Errors In Spectrophotometry Experiment
ionic background. Errors in temperature control are systematic errors. Electrode calibration error is also a source of systematic error, of possible sources of error in a spectrophotometer experiment particular importance when comparing duplicate titration curves. Good precision requires that random errors be reduced as far as possible. All instrumental measurements are subject to random error. The magnitude of this error is instrument
Sources Of Error In Spectrophotometry Lab
specific and, in the case of spectrophotometric measurements is also dependent on the magnitude of the measured quantity. The objective of the stability constant refinement is to calculate values that correspond to experimental observations within experimental error. This means that estimates are needed of the random errors present in the experimental measurements. Potentiometry Two error estimates are required by Hyperquad for potentiometric titration data. Error in titre volume. sources of error in absorption spectroscopy The error in titre volume can be estimated by weighing. It is a good idea to check both the accuracy and precision of a burette. If the weight delivered at a given temperature is measures for a series of volumes the data can be fitted to a straight line; the required error value will then be given by the error on the slope. Error in electrode reading. The error in electrode reading is more difficult to estimate. It is common practice to assume a value based on personal observations of the volt meter or pH meter. In Hyperquad it is assumed that the electrode error is a constant, independent of the actual value. Spectrophotometry A potential source of systematic error is small differences of baseline between different spectra. In order to minimize baseline errors it is preferable that neither sample nor reference cell should be moved between measurements of spectra. In practice this means either using a flow-cell or a fibre-optic probe or building a titration cell for a particular spectrophotometer. If measurements are to be made in alkaline solutions then the necessity of excluding atmospheric CO2 indicates that a closed titration system must be used. Baseline error is also af
Overview Keeping a lab notebook Writing research papers Dimensions & units Using figures (graphs) Examples of graphs Experimental error Representing error Applying statistics Overview Principles of microscopy Solutions & dilutions Protein assays Spectrophotometry Fractionation & centrifugation Radioisotopes and detection Error
Random Error In Spectrophotometry
Analysis and Significant Figures Errors using inadequate data are much less than those using
Spectrophotometer Error Range
no data at all. C. Babbage] No measurement of a physical quantity can be entirely accurate. It is important spectrophotometer lab report to know, therefore, just how much the measured value is likely to deviate from the unknown, true, value of the quantity. The art of estimating these deviations should probably be called uncertainty analysis, http://www.hyperquad.co.uk/step_by_step/exp1.htm but for historical reasons is referred to as error analysis. This document contains brief discussions about how errors are reported, the kinds of errors that can occur, how to estimate random errors, and how to carry error estimates into calculated results. We are not, and will not be, concerned with the “percent error” exercises common in high school, where the student is content with calculating the deviation from http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/data_analysis/errors_sigfigs.html some allegedly authoritative number. You might also be interested in our tutorial on using figures (Graphs). Significant figures Whenever you make a measurement, the number of meaningful digits that you write down implies the error in the measurement. For example if you say that the length of an object is 0.428 m, you imply an uncertainty of about 0.001 m. To record this measurement as either 0.4 or 0.42819667 would imply that you only know it to 0.1 m in the first case or to 0.00000001 m in the second. You should only report as many significant figures as are consistent with the estimated error. The quantity 0.428 m is said to have three significant figures, that is, three digits that make sense in terms of the measurement. Notice that this has nothing to do with the "number of decimal places". The same measurement in centimeters would be 42.8 cm and still be a three significant figure number. The accepted convention is that only one uncertain digit is to be reported for a measurement. In the example if the estimated error is 0.02 m you would report a result of 0.43 ± 0.02 m, not 0.428 ± 0.02 m. Stude
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:31:03 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:31:02 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)