Human Error In Measurement
Contents |
have some error associated with them. Anytime data is presented in class, not only in an instrumentation course, it is important they understand the errors associated with that data. Many times these errors are a result of measurement errors. Even numerical values obtained from models sources of error in chemistry lab experiment have errors that are, in part, associated with measurement errors, since observation data is used
Possible Sources Of Error In Measurement
to initialize the model. Measurement errors generally fall into two categories: random or systematic errors. However even if we know about the
Types Of Errors In Measuring Instruments
types of error we still need to know why those errors exist. We can break these into two basic categories: Instrument errors and Operator errors. Random Errors Random errors are ones that are easier to deal with
Thermometer Error In Measurement
because they cause the measurements to fluctuate around the true value. If we are trying to measure some parameter X, greater random errors cause a greater dispersion of values, but the mean of X still represents the true value for that instrument. Systematic Errors A systematic error can be more tricky to track down and is often unknown. This error is often called a bias in the measurement. In chemistry a teacher tells the student instrumental error definition to read the volume of liquid in a graduated cylinder by looking at the meniscus. A student may make an error by reading the volume by looking at the liquid level near the edge of the glass. Thus this student will always be off by a certain amount for every reading he makes. This is a systematic error. Instruments often have both systematic and random errors. What Causes Measurement Errors? Now that we know the types of measurement errors that can occur, what factors lead to errors when we take measurements? We can separate this category into 2 basic categories: instrument and operator errors. Human errors are not always blunders however since some mistakes are a result of inexperience in trying to make a particular measurement or trying to investigate a particular problem. Instrument Errors When you purchase an instrument (if it is of any real value) it comes with a long list of specs that gives a user an idea of the possible errors associated with that instrument. In labs as a faculty you may be using equipment that is not new, so you should help students be aware of the errors associated with the instrument. If the company that made the instrument still exists you can contact them to find out this information as well. Looking at these carefully can he
Engineering Medicine Agriculture Photosciences Humanities Periodic Table of the Elements Reference Tables Physical Constants Units and Conversions Organic Chemistry Glossary Search instrumental error examples site Search Search Go back to previous article Username Password Sign examples of experimental errors in Sign in Sign in Registration Forgot password Expand/collapse global hierarchy Home Core Analytical Chemistry Quantifying Nature suggest ways and means to eliminate errors in measurement Expand/collapse global location Uncertainties in Measurements Last updated 11:37, 3 Sep 2015 Save as PDF Share Share Share Tweet Share IntroductionSystematic vs. Random ErrorA Graphical RepresentationPrecision vs. AccuracyCalculating http://serc.carleton.edu/quantskills/teaching_methods/und_uncertainty/measure_error.html ErrorMethods of Reducing ErrorReferencesProblemsSolutions All measurements have a degree of uncertainty regardless of precision and accuracy. This is caused by two factors, the limitation of the measuring instrument (systematic error) and the skill of the experimenter making the measurements (random error). Introduction The graduated buret in Figure 1 contains a certain amount of water (with yellow dye) http://chem.libretexts.org/Core/Analytical_Chemistry/Quantifying_Nature/Significant_Digits/Uncertainties_in_Measurements to be measured. The amount of water is somewhere between 19 ml and 20 ml according to the marked lines. By checking to see where the bottom of the meniscus lies, referencing the ten smaller lines, the amount of water lies between 19.8 ml and 20 ml. The next step is to estimate the uncertainty between 19.8 ml and 20 ml. Making an approximate guess, the level is less than 20 ml, but greater than 19.8 ml. We then report that the measured amount is approximately 19.9 ml. The graduated cylinder itself may be distorted such that the graduation marks contain inaccuracies providing readings slightly different from the actual volume of liquid present. Figure 1: A meniscus as seen in a burette of colored water. '20.00 mL' is the correct depth measurement. Click here for a more complete description on buret use, including proper reading. Figure used with permission from Wikipedia. Systematic vs. Random Error The diagram below illustrates the distinction between systematic and random erro
laboratory equipment reduces risk of error. Related Articles Types of Observation in the Scientific Method How to http://classroom.synonym.com/kind-human-errors-can-occur-during-experiments-13768.html Collect Data From a Science Project How Important Is Scientific Evidence? http://www.physics.umd.edu/courses/Phys276/Hill/Information/Notes/ErrorAnalysis.html What Is a Positive Control in Microbiology? Human errors can be described as bumbling mistakes made during an experiment that can invalidate your data and conclusions. Scientists recognize that experimental findings may be imprecise due to variables difficult to control, such as changes error in in room temperature, slight miscalibrations in lab instruments, or a flawed research design. However, scientists and college professors have little tolerance for human errors occurring due to carelessness or sloppy technique. If you know you really messed up, redo the experiment. Failure to Follow Directions Before leaping into a laboratory activity, carefully read the error in measurement instructions in the lab manual thinking about the purpose of the experiment and possible results. If you don’t understand a step, consult with your lab partner or instructor before proceeding. Perform each step of the experiment in the correct order to the best of your ability. Don’t attempt shortcuts in the procedure to save time. Conducting an experiment is similar to following a recipe in the kitchen but far more exacting. Even slight deviations can change your results in dramatic ways. Mishaps in Measuring Spilling chemicals when measuring, using the wrong amount of solution, or forgetting to add a chemical compound are mistakes commonly made by students in introductory science labs. Measurement errors can result in flawed data, faulty conclusions and a low grade on your lab report. Worse still, you may cause a dangerous chemical reaction. Ask your lab instructor for guidance if you know your measurements are way off from the instructions; sometimes the experiment or your
of causes of random errors are: electronic noise in the circuit of an electrical instrument, irregular changes in the heat loss rate from a solar collector due to changes in the wind. Random errors often have a Gaussian normal distribution (see Fig. 2). In such cases statistical methods may be used to analyze the data. The mean m of a number of measurements of the same quantity is the best estimate of that quantity, and the standard deviation s of the measurements shows the accuracy of the estimate. The standard error of the estimate m is s/sqrt(n), where n is the number of measurements. Fig. 2. The Gaussian normal distribution. m = mean of measurements. s = standard deviation of measurements. 68% of the measurements lie in the interval m - s < x < m + s; 95% lie within m - 2s < x < m + 2s; and 99.7% lie within m - 3s < x < m + 3s. The precision of a measurement is how close a number of measurements of the same quantity agree with each other. The precision is limited by the random errors. It may usually be determined by repeating the measurements. Systematic Errors Systematic errors in experimental observations usually come from the measuring instruments. They may occur because: there is something wrong with the instrument or its data handling system, or because the instrument is wrongly used by the experimenter. Two types of systematic error can occur with instruments having a linear response: Offset or zero setting error in which the instrument does not read zero when the quantity to be measured is zero. Multiplier or scale factor error in which the instrument consistently reads changes in the quantity to be measured greater or less than the actual changes. These errors are shown in Fig. 1. Systematic errors also occur with non-linear instruments when the calibration of the instrument is not known correctly. Fig. 1. Systematic errors in a linear instrument (full line). Broken line shows response of an ideal instrument without error. Examples of systematic errors caused by the wrong use of instruments are: errors in measurements of temperature due to poor thermal contact between the thermometer and the substance whose temperature is to be found, errors in measurements of solar radiation because trees or buildings s