Internal Compiler Error In Redirect_jump
been fixed in the current or upcoming version of this product. A more detailed explanation for the resolution of this particular item may have compilation error in c been provided in the comments section. 10 0 Sign into vote ID 2869042 compilation error java Comments 12 Status Closed Workarounds 0 Type Bug Repros 3 Opened 6/28/2016 6:48:25 AM Access Restriction Public Description When
Compilation Error C++
compiling code that previously compiled without error in VS2015 Update 2 with Update 3 the following error arises (using debug settings):
1>SLBitmap.cpp(7447): fatal error C1001: An internal error has occurred in the compiler.
1> (compiler
Compiler Error Example
file 'msc1.cpp', line 1468)
1> To work around this problem, try simplifying or changing the program near the locations listed above.
1> Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
1> Help menu, or open the Technical Support help file for more information
1> INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR in 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64\CL.exe'
1> Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
1> Help menu, or compile time error in c programming open the Technical Support help file for more information
1>cl : Command line error D8040: error creating or communicating with child process
The code at line 7447 is:
pArrBytes = new MappingAlloc[nLocator];
where:
typedef cdl::MemMapObjectAllocator MappingAlloc;
The issue appears to be this constructor signature:
MemMapObjectAllocator(UINT_PTR nSize = 0);
as if I break this in to two the error goes away:
MemMapObjectAllocator();
MemMapObjectAllocator(UINT_PTR nSize);
DETAILS ATTACH A FILE EDIT THIS ITEM Assign To Item can only be reassigned when it is active. Comments (12) | Workarounds (0) | Attachments (0) Sign in to post a comment. Please enter a comment. Submit Posted by altendky on 7/31/2016 at 8:26 AM Is there somewhere that I can get an old version of the 'Visual C++ Build Tools 2015' until they are updated? I looked around but did not find any links to archived installers. Thanks for any help you can offer.Cheers,-kyle Posted by Microsoft on 7/22/2016 at 12:29 PM Apologies for the delay, but I can now confirm that this fix will be released in the next upcoming patch to Visual Studio 2015, currently scheduled for 2 August.Jonathan EmmettDeveloper - Visual C++joemmett@microsoft.com Posted by Andrey-T on 6/30/2016 at 4:18 PM I'm getting exactly the same e
Re: [Patch, cfg] Improve jump to return optimization for complex return From: Jiong Wang To: Segher Boessenkool Compilation Error In C Language
kernel dot crashing dot org> Cc: "gcc-patches\ at gcc dot gnu types of errors in compiler design dot org" , Christophe Lyon Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:01:04 +0100 Subject: Re: [Patch, cfg] Improve jump to return optimization for complex return Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none References: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/2869042/new-internal-compiler-error-only-in-vs2015-update-3 dot git dot segher at kernel dot crashing dot org> <01b8913890f998c3c3c46d770fc90fb8c1236099 dot 1462256245 dot git dot segher at kernel dot crashing dot org> <20160509150821 dot GE31139 at gate dot crashing dot org> <57331D04 dot 50808 at foss dot arm dot com> <9f11a28d-a43b-4fa6-a77e-f8f6d8ba2bba at foss dot arm dot com> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01170.html <20160614203000 dot GA13674 at gate dot crashing dot org> Segher Boessenkool writes: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:53:59PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: >> "bl to pop" into "pop" which is "jump to return" into "return", so a better >> place to fix this issue is at try_optimize_cfg where we are doing these >> jump/return optimization already: >> >> /* Try to change a branch to a return to just that return. */ >> rtx_insn *ret, *use; >> ... >> >> Currently we are using ANY_RETURN_P to check whether an rtx is return >> while ANY_RETURN_P only covered RETURN, SIMPLE_RETURN without side-effect: >> >> #define ANY_RETURN_P(X) \ >> (GET_CODE (X) == RETURN || GET_CODE (X) == SIMPLE_RETURN) > > On PowerPC we have a similar problem for jumps to trivial epilogues, > which are a parallel of a return with a (use reg:LR_REGNO). But that > one shows up for conditional jumps. On ARM, from my micro gcc bootstrap benchmark by
ID 20141204083806.GA19955@f1.c.bardezibar.internal State New Headers show Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 error in (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239BF1400DD for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:38:27 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date error in c :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Sjq8gH02aU/x2wrw3 tNnZS9or7XEFt1yQGq4o8BRLMg2J8s3oyezgp5rofG+g79K9aoAczqx7TqQxEFHB 87We3SpwTisumTWH1rUDmI9h3RSfi+DAsfdMSWkdSkNagY2PcXNd+lnI/0GkJXGe 8Ia9ka/neIs8nU2yHo9R89KX3A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=WK7bBP1c52oZhYVq1upJ6vQ dQF0=; b=uCp6py+hsaC7BIFJMsxKf79o96yCpcwKk1GP2qBa8yyVN3pxZePw4LN nMAqpNdh6ZvRxEMZRKfSNiIRH8TsViEu1nnuN0Tn4fN3RAQV0QqFqtLaXt/PFaTT /r55Yeg6dWLNEZVhqzzZqKVyyK8MX/XOd2veQfGVvfsHGgaDo1XQ= Received: (qmail 25126 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2014 08:38:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25108 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2014 08:38:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, R