Error Processing Quick-mode Payloads
Contents |
Visited Search Results View More Blog Recent Blog Posts View More Photos Recent Photos My Favorites View failed to get responder proposal fortigate More Photo Galleries PMs Unread PMs Inbox Send New PM View
No Matching Phase 2 Found Fortigate
More Page Extras Menu Forum Themes Elegant Mobile Member ListOnline User ListUser Groups Videos, Cookbook, KBVideo
Peer Has Not Completed Xauth Exchange
LibraryKnowledge BaseFortinet Cookbook Home » All Forums » [Other FortiGate and FortiOS Topics] » VPN » IPSec: Why does " phase 2" fail? Mark Thread UnreadFlat Reading
No Pending Quick-mode Negotiations
Mode❐ IPSec: Why does " phase 2" fail? Author Post Essentials Only Full Version snobs Bronze Member Total Posts : 43 Scores: 0 Reward points: 0 Joined: 2011/02/19 22:41:39 Status: offline 2013/11/14 03:13:36 (permalink) 0 IPSec: Why does " phase 2" fail? Hello, my goal is to setup an IPSec IPv6 only tunnel for notify msg received: r-u-there-ack roadwarriors / clients show vpn ipsec phase1-interface edit " IKE61" set type dynamic set interface " VLAN964" set ip-version 6 set xauthtype auto set mode aggressive set proposal 3des-sha1 aes128-sha1 aes256-sha512 set authusrgrp " RemoteAccessUsers" set psksecret ENC fgkjhdfgkjdfhgkjhgkjhdfgjghdfjkghdkjfghgdkdjgdfjkhgkdghj next show vpn ipsec phase2-interface edit " IKE62" set dst-addr-type subnet6 set keepalive enable set phase1name " IKE61" set proposal aes256-sha512 set src-addr-type subnet6 set dhcp-ipsec enable set dst-subnet6 2001::/16 set src-subnet6 2001::/16 next edit " VLAN964" set vdom " root" config ipv6 set ip6-address 2001:f587:7ab1:f64::f1/64 set ip6-allowaccess ping fgfm end set interface " port6" set vlanid 964 next edit " IKE61" set vdom " root" set type tunnel set interface " VLAN964" next config firewall policy6 edit 1 set srcintf " VLAN964" set dstintf " VLAN9640" set srcaddr " all" set dstaddr " IPSec-IPv6-Pool" set action accept set schedule " always" set service " ALL" set logtraffic all next edit 2 set srcintf " VLAN9640" set dstintf " VLAN964" set srca
› Topics › Management › Management Articles › IPSec VPN Error: IKE Phase-2 Negotiation is Failed... Management Articles no sa proposal chosen fortigate CommunityCategoryKnowledge BaseUsers turn on suggestions Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. Showing results for Search instead for Do you mean IPSec VPN Error: IKE Phase-2 Negotiation is Failed as Initiator, Quick Mode by vvasilasco on 02-08-2013 12:15 PM - edited on 09-08-2016 08:18 AM by https://forum.fortinet.com/tm.aspx?m=103613 jdelio (38,908 Views) Labels: Management , Network , VPN Issue A site-to-site IPSec VPN between a Palo Alto Networks firewall and a firewall from a different vendor is configured. Phase 1 succeeds, but Phase 2 negotiation fails. A look at the ikemgr.log with the CLI command: > tail follow yes mp-log ikemgr.log shows the https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/IPSec-VPN-Error-IKE-Phase-2-Negotiation-is-Failed-as-Initiator/ta-p/60725 following errors: ( description contains 'IKE protocol notification message received: INVALID-ID-INFORMATION (18).' ) and IKE phase-2 negotiation is failed as initiator, quick mode. Failed SA: 216.204.241.93[500]-216.203.80.108[500] message id:0x43D098BB. Due to negotiation timeout Cause The most common phase-2 failure is due to Proxy ID mismatch. Resolution To resolve Proxy ID mismatch, please try the following: Check the Proxy ID settings on the Palo Alto Networks firewall and the firewall on the other side.Note: Proxy ID for other firewall vendors may be referred to as the Access List or Access Control List (ACL). Also, check the IPSec crypto to ensure that the proposals match on both sides. See Also For more info on IPSec, please see the: IPSec and tunneling - resource list owner: vvasilasco Everyone's Tags: doc-4637ikeipsecipsec-tunnelmanagement View All (8) 2 Likes 6 of 6 people found this article helpful. Did you find this article helpful? Yes No Article Options Article History Subscribe to RSS Feed Mark as New Mark as Read Bookmark Subscribe
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta http://serverfault.com/questions/84119/ipsec-tunnel-between-cisco-and-xp-quick-mode-fails-when-initiated-by-router Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault http://forums.isaserver.org/B2B_IPSEC_VPN_Quick_Mode_negotiation_failed/m_2002105534/tm.htm Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign error processing up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top IPsec Tunnel Between Cisco and XP, Quick Mode fails When Initiated By Router up vote 1 down vote favorite I have been trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between a router and my error processing quick-mode Windows XP box. The router is 192.168.254.30, and the XP machine is 192.168.254.128. However, I can't seem to get the tunnel working. I have set the tunnel to apply it ICMP, and pings are not working from either side. On the Windows side, I can see it is being applied because I get "Negotiating IP Security." The IOS Configuration: ! version 12.3 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname VPN_TEST ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! logging buffered 4096 debugging no logging console enable secret 5 $1$3p0B$h21M/3z9dR0n3gnJPWjBm/ enable password test1 ! aaa new-model ! ! aaa authentication ppp default group radius local aaa authorization network default group radius aaa session-id common ip subnet-zero ! ! ip cef ! ip audit po max-events 100 vpdn enable ! vpdn-group 1 ! Default L2TP VPDN group accept-dialin protocol l2tp virtual-template 1 l2tp security crypto-profile l2tpprof no l2tp tunnel authentication ! async-bootp dns-server 192.168.254.253 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! username atestuser password 0 atestuser !
| Address Book | Member List | Search | FAQ | Ticket List | Log Out B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed Users viewing this topic: none Logged in as: Guest Tree Style Printable Version All Forums >> [Threat Management Gateway (TMG) 2010] >> General >> B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed Page: [1] Login Message << Older Topic Newer Topic >> B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed - 21.Dec.2010 5:43:54 PM richard.emerge Posts: 10 Joined: 7.Sep.2009 Status: offline I have got a NLB pair of TMG2010 Servers. We have setup 2 other IPSEC B2B links setup to other business partners that have been working fine. We have just added another IPSEC B2B with another partner and are having issues. I can see the tunnel come up and connect, they can ping/connect to the system at our end. When I try to connect back the other way I see errors in Windows security log. Event 4654: An IPsec Quick Mode negotiation failed. Local Endpoint: Network Address: Network Address mask: Port: 0 Tunnel Endpoint: Remote Endpoint: Network Address: Address Mask: Port: 0 Tunnel Endpoint: Private Address: Additional Information: Protocol: 0 Keying Module Name: IKE Mode: Tunnel Role: Initiator Quick Mode Filter ID: 142864 Main Mode SA ID: 26 Failure Information: State: Sent first (SA) payload Message ID: 2147483648 Failure Point: Local computer Failure Reason: Error processing Notify payload Any thoughts? Im not sure even where to being or which end is causing the problem. Post #: 1 Featured Links* RE: B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed - 22.Dec.2010 8:06:11 AM tshinder Posts: 50013 Joined: 10.Jan.2001 From: Texas Status: offline You'll need to confirm that both sides have the exact same main mode and quick mode settings. HTH, Tom _____________________________Thomas W Shinder, M.D. (in reply to richard.emerge) Post #: 2 RE: B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed - 9.Jan.2011 3:16:20 PM richard.emerge Posts: 10 Joined: 7.Sep.2009 Status: offline Unfortunately the remote end is done by another party, but they say they have the same settings as what we have used. Surely if the settings were not the same on both ends then traffic from their end would also fail, but they can successfully ping/telnet. Its only traffic going from our end to them that gives the Quick Mode errors. Is there any known issues with CISCO 2800 series gateways/routers and TMG? (in reply to tshinder) Post #: 3 RE: B2B IPSEC VPN Quick Mode negotiation failed - 10.Jan.2011 3:18:28 PM paulo.oliveira Posts: 3472 Joined: 3.Jan.2008 From: Amazon, Brazil Status