Compact Forward Error Correction Fec Schemes
Contents |
Correction (FEC) Schemes Status of this Memo This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document introduces some Forward Error Correction (FEC) schemes that supplement the FEC schemes described in RFC
What Is Forward Error Correction
3452. The primary benefits of these additional FEC schemes are that they are designed for reliable bulk delivery of forward error correction tutorial large objects using a more compact FEC Payload ID, and they can be used to sequentially deliver blocks of an object of indeterminate length. Thus, they more flexibly support different
Forward Error Correction Ppt
delivery models with less packet header overhead. This document also describes the Fully-Specified FEC scheme corresponding to FEC Encoding ID 0. This Fully-Specified FEC scheme requires no FEC coding and is introduced primarily to allow simple interoperability testing between different implementations of protocol instantiations that use the FEC building google scholar block. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Packet Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. FEC Payload ID for FEC Encoding IDs 0 and 130. . . . . . 4 2.2. Compact No-Code FEC scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3. Compact FEC scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Compact No-Code FEC scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1. Source Block Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2. Sending and Receiving a Source Block . . . . . . . . . . 8 4. Usage Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1. Reliable Bulk Data Delivery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Luby & Vicisano Experimental [Page 1] RFC 3695 FEC Schemes February 2004 4.2. Block-Stream Delivery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6. IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8. Authors' Addresses .
Bibliometrics ·Downloads (6 Weeks): 0 ·Downloads (12 Months): 3 ·Downloads (cumulative): 32 ·Citation Count: 2 Tools and Resources Buy this RFC Recommend https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3695 the ACM DLto your organization Save to Binder Export Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACMRef Share: | Contact Us | Switch to single page view (no tabs) **Javascript is not enabled and is http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=RFC3695 required for the "tabbed view" or switch to the single page view** Powered by The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2016 ACM, Inc. Terms of Usage Privacy Policy Code of Ethics Contact Us Useful downloads: Adobe Reader QuickTime Windows Media Player Real Player Did you know the ACM DL App is now available? Did you know your Organization can subscribe to the ACM Digital Library? The ACM Guide to Computing Literature All Tags Export Formats Save to Binder
Request full-text Basic Forward Error Correction (FEC) SchemesArticle with 41 Reads1st M. WatsonAbstractThis document provides Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme specifications according to the Reliable Multicast Transport https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245581253_Basic_Forward_Error_Correction_FEC_Schemes (RMT) FEC building block for the Compact No-Code FEC Scheme, the Small Block, Large Block, and Expandable FEC Scheme, the Small Block Systematic FEC Scheme, and the Compact FEC Scheme. This document obsoletes RFC 3695 and assumes responsibility for the FEC Schemes defined in RFC 3452.Do you want to read the rest of this article?Request full-text CitationsCitations16ReferencesReferences6Lightweight collaborative key forward error establishment scheme for the Internet of Things"However, the proposed system will suffer from an additional latency. In order to reinforce the reliability of the proposed distributed scheme, a forward error correction scheme [31] will be applied by the source A to handle losses and missing secret parts from assisting nodes. The principle of forward error correction scheme is to forward error correction add redundant parity packets to the original message, divided into multiple packets, in order for it to be recovered by the receiver even if some packets were altered or lost during the process of transmission. "[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This work addresses new security issues in the Internet of Things (IoT). The heterogeneous nature of IoT communications and imbalance in resource capabilities between IoT entities make it challenging to provide the required end-to-end secured connections. Clarifying how existing security protocols can be adapted to fulfill these new challenges still has to be improved. A direct use of existing key exchange schemes between two IoT entities may be unfeasible unless both entities be able to run the resource consuming cryptographic primitives required to bootstrap them – thus leaving aside a whole class of resource-constrained devices. In this paper, we revisit existing end-to-end security standards and key establishment schemes and discuss their limitations considering the specific scenarios of the IoT. Later, we propose novel collaborative approaches for key establishment designed to reduce the requirements of these existi